World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5665 5262 12 12 240 9969

Attila Szabo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Attila Szabo between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Attila Szabo published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2025. 69 of the 369 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2025. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 37 publications
1988 2025

369 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Attila Szabo: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 4
1993 3
1994 2
1995 1
1996 3
1997 1
1998 5
1999 1
2000 3
2001 4
2002 2
2003 9
2004 6
2005 5
2006 2
2007 7
2008 7
2009 5
2010 4
2011 3
2012 7
2013 11
2014 9
2015 10
2016 13
2017 21
2018 18
2019 22
2020 29
2021 29
2022 36
2023 16
2024 32
2025 37
Total 369
Download as CSV

Attila Szabo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Attila Szabo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 240 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 240
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Attila Szabo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Attila Szabo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Attila Szabo is affiliated with Eötvös Loránd University in Hungary and has contributed extensively to research in the field of psychology. Their work spans various subfields including clinical psychology, social psychology, applied psychology, sociology and political science, and physiology.

The scientist has a significant publication record with a focus on topics related to eating disorders and behaviors, behavioral health and interventions, motivation and self-concept in sports, impact of technology on adolescents, physical activity and health, COVID-19 and mental health, and pain management and placebo effect.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Could attitudes toward COVID-19 in Spain render men more vulnerable than women? (2020), published in Global Public Health
  • Hedonic use, stress, and life satisfaction as predictors of smartphone addiction (2022), published in Addictive Behaviors Reports
  • Exercise addiction: A narrative overview of research issues (2023), published in Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
  • Attitudes toward COVID-19 and stress levels in Hungary: Effects of age, perceived health status, and gender (2020), published in Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • 100 Cases of Exercise Addiction: More Evidence for a Widely Researched but Rarely Identified Dysfunction (2020), published in International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

Szabo frequently publishes in several academic venues, with a notable presence in the International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences, Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, PsycTESTS Dataset, and Addictive Behaviors Reports.

Collaborations have involved multiple coauthors, highlighting partnerships with Ferenc Ihász, Krisztina Ábel, Aleksandar Vujić, Roberto Ruiz Barquín, and Ferenc Köteles. These partnerships indicate a broad network of research within related psychological and behavioral health areas.

Their research reflects a broad engagement with psychological aspects of health, addiction, and behavioral responses, particularly in contexts influenced by social and technological factors. Studies dealing with COVID-19 impacts, smartphone addiction, and exercise addiction demonstrate the scientist's involvement with current, relevant topics within clinical and social psychology.

Best Publications

  • THE EXERCISE ADDICTION INVENTORY: A NEW BRIEF SCREENING TOOL

    Annabel Terry;Attila Szabo;Mark Griffiths

  • Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint

    Attila Szabo;Nigel Hastings

  • Exercise Addiction: Symptoms, Diagnosis, Epidemiology, and Etiology

    Krisztina Berczik;Attila Szabó;Mark D Griffiths;Tamás Kurimay

  • Academic Offences and E-Learning: Individual Propensities in Cheating.

    Jean Underwood;Attila Szabo

  • Temporal patterning of competitive emotions: a critical review.

    Ester Cerin;Attila Szabo;Nigel Hunt;Clive Williams

  • The exercise addiction inventory: a quick and easy screening tool for health practitioners

    M D Griffiths;A Szabo;A Terry

  • The Acute Effects of Humor and Exercise on Mood and Anxiety

    Attila Szabo

  • Cybercheats: Is Information and Communication Technology Fuelling Academic Dishonesty?.

    Attila Szabo;Jean Underwood

  • Psychometric properties and concurrent validity of two exercise addiction measures: A population wide study

    Kata Mónok;Krisztina Berczik;Róbert Urbán;Attila Szabo

  • The effects of slow- and fast-rhythm classical music on progressive cycling to voluntary physical exhaustion.

    Attila Szabo;Adam Small;Martin Leigh

  • The impact of Internet-based specific activities on the perceptions of Internet addiction, quality of life, and excessive usage: A cross-sectional study.

    Halley M. Pontes;Attila Szabo;Mark D. Griffiths

  • The Psychometric Properties of the Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS).

    Sándor Csibi;Mark D. Griffiths;Brian Cook;Zsolt Demetrovics

  • The exercise paradox: An interactional model for a clearer conceptualization of exercise addiction.

    Alexei Y. Egorov;Attila Szabo

  • Is excessive online usage a function of medium or activity? An empirical pilot study.

    Mark D. Griffiths;Attila Szabo

  • Methodological and Conceptual Limitations in Exercise Addiction Research.

    Attila Szabo;Mark D. Griffiths;Ricardo de La Vega Marcos;Barbara Mervó

  • Analysis of Problematic Smartphone Use Across Different Age Groups within the ‘Components Model of Addiction’

    Sándor Csibi;Mark D. Griffiths;Zsolt Demetrovics;Attila Szabo

  • Exercise Addiction in British Sport Science Students

    Attila Szabo;Mark D. Griffiths

  • The impact of exercise deprivation on well-being of habitual exercises.

    Szabo A

  • Exercise addiction in Spanish athletes: Investigation of the roles of gender, social context and level of involvement.

    Attila Szabo;Ricardo De La Vega;Roberto Ruiz-BarquÍn;Oswaldo Rivera

  • Guidelines for Internet Research

    Erin E. Michalak;Attila Szabo

  • The Placebo and Nocebo effect on sports performance: A systematic review

    Phillip Hurst;Lieke Schipof-Godart;Attila Szabo;John Raglin

Frequent Co-Authors

Zsolt Demetrovics
Zsolt Demetrovics Flinders University
Mark D. Griffiths
Mark D. Griffiths Nottingham Trent University
Lise Gauvin
Lise Gauvin University of Montreal
Róbert Urbán
Róbert Urbán Eötvös Loránd University
John S. Raglin
John S. Raglin Indiana University
Andrew M. Lane
Andrew M. Lane University of Wolverhampton
Giovanni Martinotti
Giovanni Martinotti University of Chieti-Pescara
John J. Furedy
John J. Furedy University of Toronto
Gyöngyi Kökönyei
Gyöngyi Kökönyei Eötvös Loránd University
Halley M. Pontes
Halley M. Pontes Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to various rewarding online degree and career paths. Many students opt for counseling, a closely related field with increasing opportunities, especially as demand for mental health professionals rises nationwide.

Online degree programs in counseling are popular for their flexibility and career-focused curriculum. When selecting a program, it’s important to research regional options and accreditation to ensure a reputable qualification that supports professional licensure. For instance, the best college counseling programs in South offer comprehensive online and hybrid pathways, catering to diverse student needs.

Location-specific research can lead you to well-ranked programs in your area, such as Stockton counseling degree programs, known for their flexible online offerings, or the best college counseling programs in Tucson if you’re seeking strong local support and job placement rates. Texas students may consider the best counseling degree programs in Texas, featuring well-established online tracks and diverse specialization options.

Whether your goal is clinical counseling, school counseling, or mental health advocacy, these online degrees provide a direct pathway to meaningful and in-demand careers.

Best Scientists Citing Attila Szabo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles