World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gyöngyi Kökönyei

Gyöngyi Kökönyei

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10530 9853 23 23 139 4774

Gyöngyi Kökönyei publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gyöngyi Kökönyei between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gyöngyi Kökönyei published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2020. 23 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2020. 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 18 publications
2006 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gyöngyi Kökönyei: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 3
2007 1
2008 3
2009 5
2010 0
2011 5
2012 6
2013 15
2014 13
2015 7
2016 8
2017 9
2018 5
2019 16
2020 19
2021 17
2022 16
2023 10
2024 5
2025 18
Total 181
Download as CSV

Gyöngyi Kökönyei publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gyöngyi Kökönyei sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 139
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gyöngyi Kökönyei D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gyöngyi Kökönyei sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gyöngyi Kökönyei is affiliated with Eötvös Loránd University in Hungary. Their research spans across psychology and medicine, with a particular focus on clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's work addresses diverse topics within mental health and behavioral studies. Key areas of investigation include anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes; migraine and headache studies; psychosomatic disorders and their treatments; child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development; suicide and self-harm studies; eating disorders and behaviors; and broader mental health research topics.

Kökönyei has contributed to numerous publications, including:

  • Co-occurrences of substance use and other potentially addictive behaviors: Epidemiological results from the Psychological and Genetic Factors of the Addictive Behaviors (PGA) Study, 2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • Rumination in major depressive and bipolar disorder - a meta-analysis, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Well-being profiles in adolescence: psychometric properties and latent profile analysis of the mental health continuum model - a methodological study, 2020, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • The 21-item Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Revised (BIS-R-21): An alternative three-factor model, 2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • Maladaptive Rumination Mediates the Relationship between Self-Esteem, Perfectionism, and Work Addiction: A Largescale Survey Study, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

The scientist often collaborates with other researchers. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Natália Kocsel
  • Zsolt Demetrovics
  • Melinda Reinhardt
  • Kinga Gecse
  • Dániel Baksa

Gyöngyi Kökönyei's work is regularly published in journals such as Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, European Neuropsychopharmacology, Journal of Behavioral Addictions, PLoS ONE, and BMC Psychology.

Best Publications

  • Problematic Internet Use and Problematic Online Gaming Are Not the Same: Findings from a Large Nationally Representative Adolescent Sample

    Orsolya Király;Mark D. Griffiths;Róbert Urbán;Judit Farkas

  • The Development of the Problematic Online Gaming Questionnaire (POGQ)

    Zsolt Demetrovics;Róbert Urbán;Katalin Nagygyörgy;Judit Farkas

  • The Mediating Effect of Gaming Motivation Between Psychiatric Symptoms and Problematic Online Gaming: An Online Survey

    Orsolya Király;Róbert Urbán;Mark D Griffiths;Csilla Ágoston

  • Psychometric properties and concurrent validity of two exercise addiction measures: A population wide study

    Kata Mónok;Krisztina Berczik;Róbert Urbán;Attila Szabo

  • Bifactor structural model of symptom checklists: SCL-90-R and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) in a non-clinical community sample

    Róbert Urbán;Bernadette Kun;Judit Farkas;Borbála Paksi

  • Confirmation of the three-factor model of problematic internet use on off-line adolescent and adult samples.

    Beatrix Koronczai;Róbert Urbán;Gyöngyi Kökönyei;Borbála Paksi

  • Psychometric properties of the problematic online gaming questionnaire short-form and prevalence of problematic online gaming in a national sample of adolescents

    Orsolya Pápay;Róbert Urbán;Mark D. Griffiths;Katalin Nagygyörgy

  • Socio-economic inequality in multiple health complaints among adolescents: international comparative study in 37 countries.

    Bjørn E. Holstein;Candace Currie;Will Boyce;Mogens T. Damsgaard

  • Alcohol outcome expectancies and drinking motives mediate the association between sensation seeking and alcohol use among adolescents.

    Róbert Urbán;Gyöngyi Kökönyei;Zsolt Demetrovics

  • Psychometric properties of the Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire Short-Form (PIUQ-SF-6) in a nationally representative sample of adolescents.

    Zsolt Demetrovics;Orsolya Király;Beatrix Koronczai;Mark D. Griffiths

  • Typology and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Massively Multiplayer Online Game Players

    Katalin Nagygyörgy;Róbert Urbán;Judit Farkas;Mark D. Griffiths

  • Measuring compulsive buying behaviour: Psychometric validity of three different scales and prevalence in the general population and in shopping centres

    Aniko Maraz;Andrea Eisinger;Borbála Hende;Róbert Urbán

  • The difficulties in emotion regulation scale: factor structure in chronic pain patients.

    Gyöngyi Kökönyei;Róbert Urbán;Melinda Reinhardt;Melinda Reinhardt;Anna Józan

  • The mediating effect of self-esteem, depression and anxiety between satisfaction with body appearance and problematic Internet use

    Beatrix Koronczai;Gyöngyi Kökönyei;Róbert Urbán;Bernadette Kun

  • Health-related quality of life changes of children and adolescents with chronic disease after participation in therapeutic recreation camping program

    Andrea Békési;Szabolcs Török;Gyöngyi Kökönyei;Ildikó Bokrétás

  • Global self-esteem and method effects: competing factor structures, longitudinal invariance, and response styles in adolescents.

    Róbert Urbán;Réka Szigeti;Gyöngyi Kökönyei;Zsolt Demetrovics

  • Co-occurrences of substance use and other potentially addictive behaviors: Epidemiological results from the Psychological and Genetic Factors of the Addictive Behaviors (PGA) Study.

    Eszter Kotyuk;Anna Magi;Andrea Eisinger;Orsolya Király

  • The genetics of problem and pathological gambling: a systematic review

    Agoston Gyollai;Mark D. Griffiths;Csaba Barta;Andrea Vereczkei

  • Outcome effectiveness of therapeutic recreation camping program for adolescents living with cancer and diabetes.

    Szabolcs Török;Gyöngyi Kökönyei;Lilla Károlyi;András Ittzés

  • The Role of Individual- and Macro-Level Social Determinants on Young Adolescents’ Psychosomatic Complaints

    Veronika Ottova;Michael Erhart;Wilma Vollebergh;Gyöngyi Kökönyei

  • Rumination in major depressive and bipolar disorder - a meta-analysis.

    Lilla Nóra Kovács;Zsofia K. Takacs;Zsófia Tóth;Evelin Simon

Frequent Co-Authors

Zsolt Demetrovics
Zsolt Demetrovics Flinders University
Róbert Urbán
Róbert Urbán Eötvös Loránd University
Mark D. Griffiths
Mark D. Griffiths Nottingham Trent University
Gyorgy Bagdy
Gyorgy Bagdy Semmelweis University
Xenia Gonda
Xenia Gonda Semmelweis University
Rebecca Elliott
Rebecca Elliott University of Manchester
Emmanuel Kuntsche
Emmanuel Kuntsche La Trobe University
Ian M. Anderson
Ian M. Anderson University of Manchester
Attila Szabo
Attila Szabo Eötvös Loránd University
Kenneth G. Rice
Kenneth G. Rice Georgia State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open a variety of rewarding career options, from clinical psychology and counseling to organizational behavior and human resources. Many accredited universities in the U.S. now offer flexible online bachelor's and master's programs, making it easier for students to balance studies with other commitments.

A key factor for many students is affordability. Several universities across the nation provide competitively priced psychology degrees. For those interested in studying in New York, the cheapest psychology programs in New York offer excellent value combined with quality education. Students considering the Midwest can explore affordable psychology programs in Ohio, which feature flexible online options and strong student support.

In the South, the most affordable psychology degree programs in Oklahoma provide accessible pathways to a career in mental health or research. Meanwhile, those looking for urban opportunities can consider affordable psychology programs in Oklahoma City. Graduates from these programs can pursue careers in education, health services, business, or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Gyöngyi Kökönyei

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles