World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
10924
World Ranking
5199
National Ranking
2857

Joseph C. Witt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph C. Witt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 90 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joseph C. Witt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph C. Witt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph C. Witt is affiliated with Louisiana State University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects an ongoing engagement in research without specific areas of recent publication or detailed records of individual papers publicly available.

Their research contributions cannot be detailed through specific topics, subfields, or main fields of study given the lack of recorded data in these categories. Similarly, no documented collaborations with frequent co-authors or recurring publication venues have been noted.

No book publications are associated with their name, and there is no available information on awards received.

Overall, Joseph C. Witt is a researcher linked to a major American university, though publicly accessible bibliographic and collaborative details are minimal or absent at this time.

Best Publications

  • Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions.

    Brian K. Martens;Joseph C. Witt;Stephen N. Elliott;Dion X. Darveaux

  • Treatment Implementation Following Behavioral Consultation in Schools: A Comparison of Three Follow-up Strategies

    George H. Noell;Joseph C. Witt;Natalie J. Slider;James E. Connell

  • A Multi-Year Evaluation of the Effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) Model on Identification of Children for Special Education.

    Amanda M. VanDerHeyden;Joseph C. Witt;Donna Gilbertson

  • Increasing teacher intervention implementation in general education settings through consultation and performance feedback.

    George H. Noell;Joseph C. Witt;Donna N. Gilbertson;Deborah D. Ranier

  • Assessing the acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms

    Joseph C. Witt;Brian K Martens

  • Factors affecting teachers' judgments of the acceptability of behavioral interventions: Time involvement, behavior problem severity, and type of intervention

    Joseph C. Witt;B.K. Martens;Stephen N. Elliott

  • Acceptability of positive and reductive behavioral interventions: Factors that influence teachers' decisions

    Stephen N. Elliott;Joseph C. Witt;Gloria A. Galvin;Reece Peterson

  • Increasing intervention implementation in general education following consultation: a comparison of two follow-up strategies.

    George H. Noell;Joseph C. Witt;Lynn H. LaFleur;Bruce P. Mortenson

  • TEACHER USE OF INTERVENTIONS IN GENERAL EDUCATION SETTINGS: MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF THE INDEPENDENT VARIABLE

    Joseph C. Witt;George H. Noell;Lynn H. Lafleur;Bruce P. Mortenson

  • A Model for Conducting a Functional Analysis of Academic Performance Problems

    Edward J. Daly;Brian K. Martens;Joseph C. Witt;Eric J. Dool

  • An analysis of treatment integrity in school-based behavioral consultation.

    Katherine F. Wickstrom;Kevin M. Jones;Lynn H. LaFleur;Joseph C. Witt

  • The Use of Weekly Performance Feedback to Increase Teacher Implementation of a Prereferral Academic Intervention

    Bruce P. Mortenson;Joseph C. Witt

  • Application of a Three-Tiered Response To Intervention Model for Instructional Planning, Decision Making, and the Identification of Children in Need of Services

    Scott P. Ardoin;Joseph C. Witt;James E. Connell;Jennifer L. Koenig

  • Varying Intervention Delivery in Response to Intervention: Confronting and Resolving Challenges With Measurement, Instruction, and Intensity

    Edward J. Daly;Brian K. Martens;David Barnett;Joseph C. Witt

  • Development and Validation of a Process for Screening Referrals to Special Education.

    Amanda M. VanDerHeyden;Joseph C. Witt;Gale Naquin

  • Teachers' resistance to the use of school-based interventions

    Joseph C. Witt

  • The effect of saying the same thing in different ways: The problem of language and jargon in school-based consultation

    Joseph C. Witt;Glenn Moe;Terry B. Gutkin;Lester Andrews

  • The Emergence and Possible Futures of Response to Intervention.

    Amanda M. VanDerHeyden;Joseph C. Witt;David W. Barnett

  • Handbook of behavior therapy in education

    Joseph C. Witt;Stephen N. Elliott;Frank M. Gresham

  • Examining the Incremental Benefits of Administering a Maze and Three versus One Curriculum-Based Measurement Reading Probes When Conducting Universal Screening.

    Scott P. Ardoin;Joseph C. Witt;Shannon M. Suldo;James E. Connell

Frequent Co-Authors

George H. Noell
George H. Noell Louisiana State University
Brian K. Martens
Brian K. Martens Syracuse University
Stephen N. Elliott
Stephen N. Elliott Arizona State University
Amanda M. VanDerHeyden
Amanda M. VanDerHeyden University of California, Santa Barbara
Frank M. Gresham
Frank M. Gresham Louisiana State University
Terry B. Gutkin
Terry B. Gutkin University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Shannon M. Suldo
Shannon M. Suldo University of South Florida
Thomas R. Kratochwill
Thomas R. Kratochwill University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and exciting career pathways. One popular option is becoming a Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP), a field that integrates psychology, communication sciences, and healthcare to support individuals with speech and language challenges.

Careers as an SLP require specialized education and state-specific licensure. The journey to this rewarding profession includes understanding both national standards and local requirements. For example, you can learn how to become a speech language pathologist in Virginia for insights on education and certification steps unique to the state. Similarly, SLP candidates should review slp requirements in Washington, which highlight necessary exams and supervised clinical experiences.

Requirements can vary further. Explore West Virginia speech pathologist certification requirements or Wisconsin slp certification requirements for state-specific pathways. These detailed guides help you plan your educational path, whether you are aiming for a traditional campus-based program or a flexible online degree.

The SLP career is just one example of the many options available through psychology studies. With online programs, you can tailor your learning and career plans for a field that truly makes a difference.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph C. Witt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles