World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
14168
World Ranking
3138
National Ranking
1780

Susan M. Sheridan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan M. Sheridan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 287 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Susan M. Sheridan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan M. Sheridan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susan M. Sheridan is affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the social sciences and psychology, focusing extensively on education and clinical psychology subfields. Sheridan's work broadly addresses topics such as parental involvement in education, early childhood education and development, family and disability support research, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, patient safety and medication errors, behavioral and psychological studies, and health policy implementation science.

They have contributed to multiple peer-reviewed journals with a particular emphasis on educational and psychological consultation. Frequent publication venues include the Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, The Elementary School Journal, Physical Therapy, School Psychology Review, and the Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management.

Notable recent publications by Susan M. Sheridan feature diverse topics that intersect education, psychology, and family engagement. These include:

  • "Centering Families: Advancing a New Vision for School Psychology" (2021) in School Psychology Review
  • "What Really Works in Intervention? Using Fidelity Measures to Support Optimal Outcomes" (2020) in Physical Therapy
  • "START-Play Physical Therapy Intervention Impacts Motor and Cognitive Outcomes in Infants With Neuromotor Disorders: A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial" (2020) in Physical Therapy
  • "The Effects of Consultation-based Family-school Engagement on Student and Parent Outcomes: A Meta-analysis" (2020) in Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation
  • "Evaluating the Effects of Family-School Engagement Interventions on Parent-Teacher Relationships: A Meta-analysis" (2022) in School Mental Health

Sheridan has collaborated frequently with several coauthors in their research endeavors. These include Amanda L. Witte, Lisa L. Knoche, Natalie A. Koziol, Lorey A. Wheeler, and Courtney Boise.

Their research contributions emphasize family engagement within educational settings and the impact of interventions on child development and parent-school relationships. This interdisciplinary approach spans clinical and educational psychology, as well as health-related fields, reflecting a broad engagement with behavioral sciences and practical health concerns.

Best Publications

  • Schools and families: Creating essential connections for learning.

    Sandra L. Christenson;Susan M. Sheridan

  • Professional Development in Early Childhood Programs: Process Issues and Research Needs

    Susan M. Sheridan;Carolyn Pope Edwards;Christine A. Marvin;Lisa L. Knoche

  • The Ecology of School Psychology: Examining and Changing Our Paradigm for the 21st Century.

    Susan M. Sheridan;Terry B. Gutkin

  • Is Consultation Effective? A Review of Outcome Research

    Susan M. Sheridan;Marshall Welch;Scott F. Orme

  • Parent Engagement and School Readiness: Effects of the Getting Ready Intervention on Preschool Children’s Social–Emotional Competencies

    Susan M. Sheridan;Lisa L. Knoche;Carolyn P. Edwards;James A. Bovaird

  • A Randomized Trial Examining the Effects of Conjoint Behavioral Consultation and the Mediating Role of the Parent-Teacher Relationship.

    Susan M. Sheridan;James A. Bovaird;Todd A. Glover;S. Andrew Garbacz

  • Conjoint behavioral consultation : promoting family-school connections and interventions

    Susan M. Sheridan;Thomas R. Kratochwill

  • Behavioral Parent-Teacher Consultation: Conceptual and Research Considerations.

    Susan M. Sheridan;Thomas R. Kratochwill

  • What's the Score and Game Plan on Teaming in Schools?: A Review of the Literature on Team Teaching and School-Based Problem-Solving Teams

    Marshall Welch;Kerrilee Brownell;Susan M. Sheridan

  • A randomized trial examining the effects of parent engagement on early language and literacy: the Getting Ready intervention.

    Susan M. Sheridan;Lisa L. Knoche;Kevin A. Kupzyk;Carolyn Pope Edwards

  • Family-School Connections in Rural Educational Settings: A Systematic Review of the Empirical Literature.

    Carrie A. Semke;Susan M. Sheridan

  • The Effects of Conjoint Behavioral Consultation: Results of a 4-Year Investigation

    Susan M. Sheridan;John W. Eagle;Richard J. Cowan;William Mickelson

  • Implementing Scientific Practices Through Case Studies: Examples Using Home-School Interventions and Consultation

    Jo Ann Galloway;Susan M. Sheridan

  • Behavioral consultation with parents and teachers: Delivering treatment for socially withdrawn children at home and school.

    Susan M. Sheridan;Thomas R. Kratochwill;Stephen N. Elliott

  • Parents' and School Psychologists' Perspectives on Parent Involvement Activities.

    Sandra L. Christenson;Christine M. Hurley;Susan M. Sheridan;Kevin Fenstermacher

  • Conjoint Behavioral Consultation: A Procedural Manual

    John R. Bergan;Thomas R. Kratochwill;Susan Sheridan

  • A contextual approach to the assessment of social skills: Identifying meaningful behaviors for social competence

    Emily D. Warnes;Emily D. Warnes;Susan M. Sheridan;Jenenne Geske;William A. Warnes

  • A Meta-Analysis of Family-School Interventions and Children’s Social-Emotional Functioning: Moderators and Components of Efficacy:

    Susan M. Sheridan;Tyler E. Smith;Elizabeth Moorman Kim;S. Natasha Beretvas

  • Congruence in Parent-Teacher Relationships: The Role of Shared Perceptions.

    Kathleen M. Minke;Susan M. Sheridan;Elizabeth Moorman Kim;Ji Hoon Ryoo

  • Using student-managed interventions to increase homework completion and accuracy

    Daniel E. Olympia;Susan M. Sheridan;William R. Jenson;Debra Andrews

  • Schools and Families: Creating Essential Connections for Learning (The Guilford School Practitioner Series)

    Sandra L. Christenson;Susan M. Sheridan

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas R. Kratochwill
Thomas R. Kratochwill University of Wisconsin–Madison
Sandra L. Christenson
Sandra L. Christenson University of Minnesota
William R. Jenson
William R. Jenson University of Utah
Thomas J. Power
Thomas J. Power Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Marley W. Watkins
Marley W. Watkins Baylor University
Stephen N. Elliott
Stephen N. Elliott Arizona State University
David S. Mandell
David S. Mandell University of Pennsylvania
Steven C. Marcus
Steven C. Marcus University of Pennsylvania
Edward S. Shapiro
Edward S. Shapiro Lehigh University
David J. Hansen
David J. Hansen University of Nebraska–Lincoln

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree programs and career pathways. Online bachelor’s and master’s degrees in psychology are widely available, offering flexibility for students balancing other responsibilities. After graduation, many pursue careers as mental health counselors, a rapidly growing field with significant demand across the country.

Counseling roles often require specific academic credentials and state licensure. It’s important to understand how requirements can differ by location. For example, those interested in learning how to become a mental health counselor in El Paso or exploring Fort Wayne mental health counselor education requirements must familiarize themselves with regional guidelines. Similarly, if you’d like to become a mental health counselor in Fort Worth or need to know about Fremont mental health counselor certification requirements, it’s essential to check local standards before enrolling in a program.

Whether you are considering entry-level or advanced degrees, online study can help you reach your professional goals in psychology and counseling, while allowing you to meet certification and licensing requirements for your chosen location.

Best Scientists Citing Susan M. Sheridan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles