World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9984 9350 4 4 96 3690

Yvonne Höller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yvonne Höller between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yvonne Höller published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2017. 14 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2017. 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 9 publications
2007 2025

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yvonne Höller: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 3
2008 1
2009 1
2010 2
2011 5
2012 5
2013 14
2014 15
2015 14
2016 13
2017 18
2018 12
2019 12
2020 12
2021 8
2022 3
2023 6
2024 5
2025 9
Total 158
Download as CSV

Yvonne Höller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yvonne Höller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 96
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Yvonne Höller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yvonne Höller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Yvonne Höller is affiliated with the University of Akureyri in Iceland and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their research primarily focuses on cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, neurology, and endocrine and autonomic systems.

The scientist's work covers several topics, including:

  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies
  • Sleep and wakefulness research
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Sleep and related disorders

Yvonne Höller has published numerous papers, some of the recent notable publications are:

  • "Distance learning in higher education during COVID-19: The role of basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation for persistence and procrastination-a multi-country study" (2021) in PLoS ONE
  • "The effect of age and chronotype on seasonality, sleep problems, and mood" (2021) in Psychiatry Research
  • "Prediction of Cognitive Decline in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy and Mild Cognitive Impairment by EEG, MRI, and Neuropsychology" (2020) in Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
  • "Disinhibition of sensory cortex in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis" (2020) in Neuroscience Letters
  • "Pitfalls in Scalp High-Frequency Oscillation Detection From Long-Term EEG Monitoring" (2020) in Frontiers in Neurology

The scientist regularly publishes in several journals, with frequent appearances in Frontiers in Neurology and Brain Sciences, totaling six publications in each venue. Other venues include Neural Plasticity, Frontiers in Psychiatry, and Applied Sciences.

Collaboration is a significant feature of Yvonne Höller's career. They frequently work with co-authors such as Eugen Trinka, Raffaele Nardone, Aljoscha Thomschewski, Vanessa Frey, and Ragnar Olafsson.

Best Publications

  • Visual P2 component is related to theta phase-locking

    R. Freunberger;W. Klimesch;M. Doppelmayr;Y. Höller

  • Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE)

    M. Leitinger;Y. Höller;G. Kalss;A. Rohracher

  • Functional brain reorganization after spinal cord injury: Systematic review of animal and human studies

    Raffaele Nardone;Yvonne Höller;Francesco Brigo;Martin Seidl

  • Altered network properties of the fronto-parietal network and the thalamus in impaired consciousness.

    Julia Sophia Crone;Andrea Soddu;Yvonne Höller;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)/repetitive TMS in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

    R. Nardone;F. Tezzon;Y. Höller;S. Golaszewski

  • Altered directed functional connectivity in temporal lobe epilepsy in the absence of interictal spikes: A high density EEG study.

    Ana Coito;Melanie Genetti;Francesca Pittau;Giannina R. Iannotti

  • Deactivation of the default mode network as a marker of impaired consciousness: an FMRI study

    Julia Sophia Crone;Julia Sophia Crone;Gunther Ladurner;Gunther Ladurner;Yvonne Höller;Yvonne Höller;Stefan Golaszewski

  • Distance learning in higher education during COVID-19: The role of basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation for persistence and procrastination-a multi-country study.

    Elisabeth R Pelikan;Selma Korlat;Julia Reiter;Julia Holzer

  • Impaired consciousness is linked to changes in effective connectivity of the posterior cingulate cortex within the default mode network

    Julia Sophia Crone;Matthias Schurz;Matthias Schurz;Yvonne Höller;Jürgen Bergmann

  • Minimal hepatic encephalopathy: A review.

    Raffaele Nardone;Alexandra C. Taylor;Yvonne Höller;Francesco Brigo

  • Thiamine deficiency induced neurochemical, neuroanatomical, and neuropsychological alterations: a reappraisal.

    Raffaele Nardone;Yvonne Höller;Monica Storti;Monica Christova

  • Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: A review

    Raffaele Nardone;Yvonne Höller;Stefan Leis;Peter Höller

  • rTMS of the prefrontal cortex has analgesic effects on neuropathic pain in subjects with spinal cord injury.

    R Nardone;Yvonne Höller;P B Langthaler;P B Langthaler;P Lochner

  • Functional similarities between the P1 component and alpha oscillations.

    Roman Freunberger;Yvonne Höller;Birgit Griesmayr;Walter Gruber

  • Quantitative Pharmaco-Electroencephalography in Antiepileptic Drug Research.

    Yvonne Höller;Christoph Helmstaedter;Klaus Lehnertz

  • Comparison of EEG-features and classification methods for motor imagery in patients with disorders of consciousness.

    Yvonne Höller;Jürgen Bergmann;Jürgen Bergmann;Aljoscha Thomschewski;Aljoscha Thomschewski;Martin Kronbichler;Martin Kronbichler

  • Network Perspectives on Epilepsy Using EEG/MEG Source Connectivity

    Pieter van Mierlo;Yvonne Höller;Niels K. Focke;Serge Vulliemoz

  • Cognitive function and cholinergic transmission in patients with subcortical vascular dementia and microbleeds: a TMS study

    Raffaele Nardone;Pierpaolo De Blasi;Martin Seidl;Yvonne Höller

  • Testing Mean Differences among Groups: Multivariate and Repeated Measures Analysis with Minimal Assumptions

    Arne C Bathke;Sarah Friedrich;Markus Pauly;Frank Konietschke

  • Descending motor pathways and cortical physiology after spinal cord injury assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review.

    Raffaele Nardone;Yvonne Höller;Francesco Brigo;Andrea Orioli

  • Connectivity biomarkers can differentiate patients with different levels of consciousness

    Yvonne Höller;Aljoscha Thomschewski;Jürgen Bergmann;Martin Kronbichler

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugen Trinka
Eugen Trinka Paracelsus Medical University
Raffaele Nardone
Raffaele Nardone Paracelsus Medical University
Francesco Brigo
Francesco Brigo University of Verona
Stefan Golaszewski
Stefan Golaszewski Paracelsus Medical University
Martin Kronbichler
Martin Kronbichler University of Salzburg
Andreas Uhl
Andreas Uhl University of Salzburg
Gunther Ladurner
Gunther Ladurner University of Salzburg
Serge Vulliemoz
Serge Vulliemoz University of Geneva
Wolfgang Klimesch
Wolfgang Klimesch University of Salzburg
Matthias Schurz
Matthias Schurz University of Innsbruck

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology or counseling can open the door to a wide array of rewarding career paths. Students often pursue specializations in areas like clinical psychology, school counseling, or mental health therapy to meet the growing demand for qualified professionals.

When choosing a program, it's important to consider factors such as accreditation, faculty expertise, and support for job placement. Programs with strong reputations can provide a solid foundation for licensure and career advancement. Candidates interested in regional strengths might review the best college counseling programs in Nashville for options in the South, or the best counseling program rankings in the Northeast for programs across that dynamic region.

For those focused on urban opportunities or specific states, exploring the best counseling program rankings in New York or the best college counseling programs in Ohio can provide valuable insights into high-quality training options.

By aligning your educational pathway with program strengths and career objectives, you can position yourself for long-term success in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Yvonne Höller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles