World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gunther Ladurner

Gunther Ladurner

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
8346
World Ranking
7351
National Ranking
45

Gunther Ladurner publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunther Ladurner sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 217 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Gunther Ladurner D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunther Ladurner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gunther Ladurner is affiliated with the University of Salzburg in Austria. Their research spans several fields including Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable subfields such as Molecular Biology, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Biomedical Engineering, and Biophysics.

The scientist's work primarily focuses on a range of topics within biomedical research. Key areas of investigation include:

  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
  • Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Corneal surgery and disorders

Gunther Ladurner has contributed to several recent scientific publications. These include:

  • Longitudinal investigation of spatial memory and retinal parameters in a 5xFAD model of Alzheimer's disease reveals differences dependent on genotype and sex, 2025, Biomedical Optics Express
  • Longitudinal investigation of spatial memory and retinal parameters in a 5xFAD model of Alzheimer's disease reveals differences dependent on genotype and sex, 2025, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Analysis of pulsatile motion in the murine cornea using phase-sensitive visible-light optical coherence tomography, 2025, Biomedical Optics Express

The venues where Gunther Ladurner often publishes include Biomedical Optics Express and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Collaborative efforts are a significant part of their research, with frequent co-authors being Conrad W. Merkle, Lucas May, Sybren Worm, Yash Patel, and Maria Varaka.

Best Publications

  • A common polymorphism in the promoter of UCP2 is associated with decreased risk of obesity in middle-aged humans.

    Harald Esterbauer;Clemens Schneitler;Hannes Oberkofler;Christoph Ebenbichler

  • Cognitive function and fMRI in patients with multiple sclerosis: evidence for compensatory cortical activation during an attention task.

    Wolfgang Staffen;A Mair;Harald Zauner;J. Unterrainer

  • The visual word form area and the frequency with which words are encountered: evidence from a parametric fMRI study.

    Martin Kronbichler;Florian Hutzler;Heinz Wimmer;Alois Mair

  • Do visual perspective tasks need theory of mind

    Markus Aichhorn;Josef Perner;Martin Kronbichler;Martin Kronbichler;Wolfgang Staffen;Wolfgang Staffen

  • Thinking of mental and other representations: the roles of left and right temporo-parietal junction.

    Josef Perner;Markus Aichhorn;Martin Kronbichler;Wolfgang Staffen

  • Genetic architecture of the APM1 gene and its influence on adiponectin plasma levels and parameters of the metabolic syndrome in 1,727 healthy Caucasians.

    Iris M. Heid;Stefanie A. Wagner;Henning Gohlke;Bernhard Iglseder

  • Temporo-parietal junction activity in theory-of-mind tasks: Falseness, beliefs, or attention

    Markus Aichhorn;Josef Perner;Benjamin Weiss;Martin Kronbichler

  • Menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptive use modulate human brain structure.

    Belinda Pletzer;Martin Kronbichler;Markus Aichhorn;Jürgen Bergmann

  • Developmental dyslexia: Gray matter abnormalities in the occipitotemporal cortex

    Martin Kronbichler;Heinz Wimmer;Wolfgang Staffen;Florian Hutzler

  • The Metabolic Syndrome Is a Stronger Risk Factor for Early Carotid Atherosclerosis in Women Than in Men

    Bernhard Iglseder;Paula Cip;Liane Malaimare;Gunther Ladurner

  • Taxi vs. Taksi: On Orthographic Word Recognition in the Left Ventral Occipitotemporal Cortex

    Martin Kronbichler;Jürgen Bergmann;Florian Hutzler;Wolfgang Staffen

  • Evidence for a dysfunction of left posterior reading areas in German dyslexic readers.

    Martin Kronbichler;Florian Hutzler;Wolfgang Staffen;Alois Mair

  • Plasma adiponectin levels and sonographic phenotypes of subclinical carotid artery atherosclerosis: data from the SAPHIR Study.

    Bernhard Iglseder;Vitolds Mackevics;Andreas Stadlmayer;Gernot Tasch

  • A dual-route perspective on poor reading in a regular orthography: An fMRI study

    Heinz Wimmer;Matthias Schurz;Denise Sturm;Fabio Richlan

  • Stimulating music increases motor coordination in patients afflicted with Morbus Parkinson.

    Günther Bernatzky;Patrick Bernatzky;Horst-Peter Hesse;Wolfgang Staffen

  • Selective brain activity in response to one's own name in the persistent vegetative state.

    Wolfgang Staffen;M. Kronbichler;M. Aichhorn;A. Mair

  • A dual-route perspective on brain activation in response to visual words: evidence for a length by lexicality interaction in the visual word form area (VWFA).

    Matthias Schurz;Denise Sturm;Fabio Richlan;Martin Kronbichler

  • Deactivation of the default mode network as a marker of impaired consciousness: an FMRI study

    Julia Sophia Crone;Julia Sophia Crone;Gunther Ladurner;Gunther Ladurner;Yvonne Höller;Yvonne Höller;Stefan Golaszewski

  • Measuring the progression of idiopathic Parkinson's disease with [123I] beta-CIT SPECT.

    W. Staffen;A. Mair;J. Unterrainer;E. Trinka

  • A common left occipito-temporal dysfunction in developmental dyslexia and acquired letter-by-letter reading?

    Fabio Richlan;Denise Sturm;Matthias Schurz;Martin Kronbichler

  • [Sex differences in Alzheimer's disease].

    Reinhold Schmidt;Eva Kienbacher;Thomas Benke;Peter Dal-Bianco

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Golaszewski
Stefan Golaszewski Paracelsus Medical University
Martin Kronbichler
Martin Kronbichler University of Salzburg
Eugen Trinka
Eugen Trinka Paracelsus Medical University
Raffaele Nardone
Raffaele Nardone Paracelsus Medical University
Yvonne Höller
Yvonne Höller University of Akureyri
Heinz Wimmer
Heinz Wimmer University of Salzburg
Franz Fazekas
Franz Fazekas Medical University of Graz
Josef Perner
Josef Perner University of Salzburg
Wolfgang Klimesch
Wolfgang Klimesch University of Salzburg
Matthias Schurz
Matthias Schurz University of Innsbruck

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary fields and career options. Many students interested in brain science pursue related degrees online for flexibility and affordability. For those passionate about helping individuals and families, a marriage and family therapist degree can provide specialized training in mental health and relationships, complementing a neuroscience background.

If you wish to expand your psychology expertise, a masters of psychology online offers advanced understanding of human behavior and cognitive processes, essential for neuroscience-related careers. Budget-conscious learners can explore the cheapest psychology degree online to build foundational knowledge without high costs.

Social work is another pathway with strong relevance to neuroscience, as it addresses mental health and societal issues. For easier program admission, consider the msw online degree. Whether aiming for clinical settings, research, or community outreach, these online programs support diverse, neuroscience-informed career trajectories.

Best Scientists Citing Gunther Ladurner

Recently Published Articles