World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin Kronbichler

Martin Kronbichler

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
10049
World Ranking
5705
National Ranking
34

Martin Kronbichler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Kronbichler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Martin Kronbichler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Kronbichler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Kronbichler is affiliated with the University of Salzburg in Austria and focuses primarily on research within the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine. Their work extends across several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, and Neurology.

Kronbichler's research covers a range of topics with significant attention given to Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Epilepsy Research and Treatment, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, and Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus.

Frequent collaborators include Lisa Kronbichler, Eugen Trinka, Lavinia Carmen Uscătescu, Sarah Said-Yürekli, and Wolfgang Aichhorn.

Publications by Kronbichler appear regularly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Neurology, Pain, Schizophrenia, and Brain. Some recent papers include:

  • Basal forebrain volume reliably predicts the cortical spread of Alzheimer's degeneration (2020) published in Brain
  • Visual word form processing deficits driven by severity of reading impairments in children with developmental dyslexia (2020) published in Scientific Reports
  • Ageing as risk factor for tinnitus and its complex interplay with hearing loss-evidence from online and NHANES data (2023) published in BMC Medicine
  • Neural Processing During Fear Extinction Predicts Intrusive Memories (2020) published in Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Neuroscientific evidence for pain being a classically conditioned response to trauma- and pain-related cues in humans (2022) published in Pain

Best Publications

  • Functional abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies

    Fabio Richlan;Martin Kronbichler;Heinz Wimmer

  • Meta-analyzing brain dysfunctions in dyslexic children and adults

    Fabio Richlan;Martin Kronbichler;Heinz Wimmer

  • Intrinsic functional connectivity differentiates minimally conscious from unresponsive patients

    Athena Demertzi;Georgios Antonopoulos;Lizette Heine;Henning U. Voss

  • The visual word form area and the frequency with which words are encountered: evidence from a parametric fMRI study.

    Martin Kronbichler;Florian Hutzler;Heinz Wimmer;Alois Mair

  • Reading in the brain of children and adults: A meta‐analysis of 40 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies

    Anna Martin;Anna Martin;Matthias Schurz;Martin Kronbichler;Martin Kronbichler;Fabio Richlan

  • Structural abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: A meta‐analysis of voxel‐based morphometry studies

    Fabio Richlan;Martin Kronbichler;Martin Kronbichler;Heinz Wimmer

  • Do visual perspective tasks need theory of mind

    Markus Aichhorn;Josef Perner;Martin Kronbichler;Martin Kronbichler;Wolfgang Staffen;Wolfgang Staffen

  • Thinking of mental and other representations: the roles of left and right temporo-parietal junction.

    Josef Perner;Markus Aichhorn;Martin Kronbichler;Wolfgang Staffen

  • Children with dyslexia lack multiple specializations along the visual word-form (VWF) system.

    Sanne van der Mark;Kerstin Bucher;Urs Maurer;Urs Maurer;Enrico Schulz;Enrico Schulz

  • Computational mechanisms of curiosity and goal-directed exploration.

    Philipp Schwartenbeck;Johannes Passecker;Tobias U Hauser;Thomas Hb FitzGerald;Thomas Hb FitzGerald

  • Temporo-parietal junction activity in theory-of-mind tasks: Falseness, beliefs, or attention

    Markus Aichhorn;Josef Perner;Benjamin Weiss;Martin Kronbichler

  • Menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptive use modulate human brain structure.

    Belinda Pletzer;Martin Kronbichler;Markus Aichhorn;Jürgen Bergmann

  • Developmental dyslexia: Gray matter abnormalities in the occipitotemporal cortex

    Martin Kronbichler;Heinz Wimmer;Wolfgang Staffen;Florian Hutzler

  • Resting-State and Task-Based Functional Brain Connectivity in Developmental Dyslexia

    Matthias Schurz;Heinz Wimmer;Fabio Richlan;Philipp Ludersdorfer

  • Perhaps correlational but not causal: no effect of dyslexic readers' magnocellular system on their eye movements during reading.

    Florian Hutzler;Martin Kronbichler;Arthur M. Jacobs;Heinz Wimmer

  • Taxi vs. Taksi: On Orthographic Word Recognition in the Left Ventral Occipitotemporal Cortex

    Martin Kronbichler;Jürgen Bergmann;Florian Hutzler;Wolfgang Staffen

  • Evidence for a dysfunction of left posterior reading areas in German dyslexic readers.

    Martin Kronbichler;Florian Hutzler;Wolfgang Staffen;Alois Mair

  • Dyslexic brain activation abnormalities in deep and shallow orthographies: A meta‐analysis of 28 functional neuroimaging studies

    Anna Isabel Martin;Martin Kronbichler;Fabio Richlan

  • Altered network properties of the fronto-parietal network and the thalamus in impaired consciousness.

    Julia Sophia Crone;Andrea Soddu;Yvonne Höller;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse

  • A dual-route perspective on poor reading in a regular orthography: An fMRI study

    Heinz Wimmer;Matthias Schurz;Denise Sturm;Fabio Richlan

  • Dyslexia: verbal impairments in the absence of magnocellular impairments.

    Martin Kronbichler;Florian Hutzler;Heinz Wimmer

Frequent Co-Authors

Gunther Ladurner
Gunther Ladurner University of Salzburg
Stefan Golaszewski
Stefan Golaszewski Paracelsus Medical University
Eugen Trinka
Eugen Trinka Paracelsus Medical University
Matthias Schurz
Matthias Schurz University of Innsbruck
Heinz Wimmer
Heinz Wimmer University of Salzburg
Yvonne Höller
Yvonne Höller University of Akureyri
Raffaele Nardone
Raffaele Nardone Paracelsus Medical University
Josef Perner
Josef Perner University of Salzburg
R. Nathan Spreng
R. Nathan Spreng McGill University
Rüdiger J. Seitz
Rüdiger J. Seitz Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to various academic and professional opportunities. Many students interested in neuroscience or related fields consider online accredited psyd programs, as they provide flexibility and a streamlined path toward a clinical psychology career. These online options are both respected and convenient for those balancing work or family commitments.

For those leaning towards counseling, the mft program (Marriage and Family Therapy) offers a focused route to become a licensed therapist. Online MFT programs can be completed relatively quickly and are ideal for people aiming to enter the mental health field.

If speed is a priority, consider accelerated programs that help you earn your degree faster than traditional timelines. These programs can lower costs and help you start your career sooner.

When choosing your academic path, look at the best bachelor degrees to get for future earning potential. Neuroscience and related health fields are among the most rewarding, both intellectually and financially.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Kronbichler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles