World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
11271
World Ranking
4698
National Ranking
30

Raffaele Nardone publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raffaele Nardone sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 335 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Raffaele Nardone D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raffaele Nardone sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Raffaele Nardone is affiliated with Paracelsus Medical University in Austria and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with a particular focus on neurology and cognitive neuroscience. Their research encompasses various subfields including psychiatry and mental health, epidemiology, and rehabilitation.

The scientist's work spans multiple key topics such as:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Migraine and Headache Studies

Nardone's research output is published in numerous notable venues, reflecting the diversity of their work. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Neurological Sciences
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Epileptic Disorders
  • Neurophysiologie Clinique
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Collaboration features prominently in their career, with frequent coauthors such as:

  • Francesco Brigo
  • Eugen Trinka
  • Viviana Versace
  • Luca Sebastianelli
  • Leopold Saltuari

Some of the recent scholarly contributions by Raffaele Nardone include:

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018), 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Neuropsychological and neurophysiological correlates of fatigue in post-acute patients with neurological manifestations of COVID-19: Insights into a challenging symptom, 2020, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
  • Corrigendum to "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)" [Clin. Neurophysiol. 131 (2020) 474-528], 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Cannabidiol efficacy and clobazam status: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, Epilepsia
  • Classification Accuracy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Dementias, 2020, Annals of Neurology

Best Publications

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;André Aleman;Chris Baeken;David H. Benninger

  • Neuropsychological and neurophysiological correlates of fatigue in post-acute patients with neurological manifestations of COVID-19: Insights into a challenging symptom.

    Paola Ortelli;Davide Ferrazzoli;Luca Sebastianelli;Michael Engl

  • Effects of lorazepam on short latency afferent inhibition and short latency intracortical inhibition in humans

    V. Di Lazzaro;A. Oliviero;E. Saturno;M. Dileone

  • Acute Symptomatic Seizures Caused by Electrolyte Disturbances

    Raffaele Nardone;Francesco Brigo;Eugen Trinka

  • Functional brain reorganization after spinal cord injury: Systematic review of animal and human studies

    Raffaele Nardone;Yvonne Höller;Francesco Brigo;Martin Seidl

  • High-frequency oscillations in epilepsy and surgical outcome. A meta-analysis.

    Yvonne Höller;Raoul Kutil;Lukas Klaffenböck;Aljoscha Thomschewski

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)/repetitive TMS in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

    R. Nardone;F. Tezzon;Y. Höller;S. Golaszewski

  • Corrigendum to "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)" [Clin. Neurophysiol. 131 (2020) 474-528].

    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur;André Aleman;Chris Baeken;David H Benninger

  • Abnormal short latency afferent inhibition in early Alzheimer’s disease: a transcranial magnetic demonstration

    Raffaele Nardone;Jürgen Bergmann;Martin Kronbichler;Alexander Kunz

  • Effect of Transcranial Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Alzheimer Disease: A Review

    Raffaele Nardone;Jürgen Bergmann;Monica Christova;Francesca Caleri

  • Nonintravenous midazolam versus intravenous or rectal diazepam for the treatment of early status epilepticus: A systematic review with meta-analysis

    Francesco Brigo;Raffaele Nardone;Frediano Tezzon;Eugen Trinka

  • Minimal hepatic encephalopathy: A review.

    Raffaele Nardone;Alexandra C. Taylor;Yvonne Höller;Francesco Brigo

  • Short latency afferent inhibition differs among the subtypes of mild cognitive impairment.

    Raffaele Nardone;Jürgen Bergmann;Monica Christova;Francesca Caleri

  • Thiamine deficiency induced neurochemical, neuroanatomical, and neuropsychological alterations: a reappraisal.

    Raffaele Nardone;Yvonne Höller;Monica Storti;Monica Christova

  • Cannabidiol efficacy and clobazam status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Simona Lattanzi;Eugen Trinka;Eugen Trinka;Pasquale Striano;Gaetano Zaccara

  • Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: A review

    Raffaele Nardone;Yvonne Höller;Stefan Leis;Peter Höller

  • Excitability of the motor cortex to magnetic stimulation in patients with cerebellar lesions.

    V Di Lazzaro;D Restuccia;M Molinari;M G Leggio

  • When one plus one makes three: the quest for rational antiepileptic polytherapy with supraadditive anticonvulsant efficacy.

    Francesco Brigo;Harald Ausserer;Frediano Tezzon;Raffaele Nardone

  • Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy in the elderly: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

    Simona Lattanzi;Eugen Trinka;Eugen Trinka;Cinzia Del Giovane;Raffaele Nardone

  • Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in subjects with sleep disorders.

    Raffaele Nardone;Luca Sebastianelli;Viviana Versace;Francesco Brigo

  • Motor cortex inhibitory circuits in dementia with Lewy bodies and in Alzheimer's disease.

    R. Nardone;A. Bratti;F. Tezzon

  • Why do people Google epilepsy?: An infodemiological study of online behavior for epilepsy-related search terms

    Francesco Brigo;Stanley C. Igwe;Harald Ausserer;Raffaele Nardone

  • Modulation of motor cortex excitability by different levels of whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation.

    Stefan M. Golaszewski;Jürgen Bergmann;Monica Christova;Alexander B. Kunz

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesco Brigo
Francesco Brigo University of Verona
Eugen Trinka
Eugen Trinka Paracelsus Medical University
Stefan Golaszewski
Stefan Golaszewski Paracelsus Medical University
Yvonne Höller
Yvonne Höller University of Akureyri
Gunther Ladurner
Gunther Ladurner University of Salzburg
Martin Kronbichler
Martin Kronbichler University of Salzburg
Domenico Restuccia
Domenico Restuccia Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
V. Di Lazzaro
V. Di Lazzaro Università Campus Bio-Medico
P.A. Tonali
P.A. Tonali Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Antonio Oliviero
Antonio Oliviero Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos de Toledo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Raffaele Nardone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles