World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 48 6150 5665 2685 2422 130 10275

Martin M. Monti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin M. Monti between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin M. Monti published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2020. 20 of the 182 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2020. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

182 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin M. Monti: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 0
2007 3
2008 1
2009 6
2010 4
2011 4
2012 6
2013 7
2014 5
2015 5
2016 6
2017 3
2018 11
2019 10
2020 22
2021 19
2022 15
2023 16
2024 17
2025 19
2026 1
Total 182
Download as CSV

Martin M. Monti publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin M. Monti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 130 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469 130
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin M. Monti D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin M. Monti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435 48
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin M. Monti is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles, United States. Their primary fields of research are Medicine and Neuroscience, with notable contributions spanning 123 and 79 publications, respectively. The main subfields in which they have worked include Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's research topics focus on areas such as Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances. Additional subjects include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Martin M. Monti include:

  • "Consciousness among delta waves: a paradox?", 2021, Brain
  • "The Curing Coma Campaign: Framing Initial Scientific Challenges-Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council Meeting", 2020, Neurocritical Care
  • "Consciousness is supported by near-critical slow cortical electrodynamics", 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Therapies to Restore Consciousness in Patients with Severe Brain Injuries: A Gap Analysis and Future Directions", 2021, Neurocritical Care
  • "Ultrasonic thalamic stimulation in chronic disorders of consciousness", 2021, Brain Stimulation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Martin M. Monti include:

  • Norman M. Spivak
  • Paul Vespa
  • Evan S. Lutkenhoff
  • Daniel Toker
  • Micah Johnson

Publication venues frequently chosen for their work are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Neurocritical Care
  • Brain Sciences
  • Communications Biology

Martin M. Monti has also contributed to book publications, including "The Limits of Consciousness," published in 2020 by Open Agenda Publishing eBooks.

Best Publications

  • Willful Modulation of Brain Activity in Disorders of Consciousness

    Martin M. Monti;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse;Martin R. Coleman;Melanie Boly

  • The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control

    Adam Hampshire;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Martin M. Monti;John S. Duncan

  • Statistical Analysis of fMRI Time-Series: A Critical Review of the GLM Approach.

    Martin M Monti

  • The vegetative state

    Martin M Monti;Steven Laureys;Adrian M Owen

  • Diffusion weighted imaging distinguishes the vegetative state from the minimally conscious state.

    Davinia Fernández-Espejo;Tristan Bekinschtein;Martin M. Monti;John D. Pickard

  • Non-Invasive Ultrasonic Thalamic Stimulation in Disorders of Consciousness after Severe Brain Injury: A First-in-Man Report

    Martin M. Monti;Caroline Schnakers;Alexander S. Korb;Alexander Bystritsky

  • Optimized brain extraction for pathological brains (optiBET).

    Evan S. Lutkenhoff;Matthew Rosenberg;Jeffrey Chiang;Kunyu Zhang

  • Spectral signatures of reorganised brain networks in disorders of consciousness.

    Srivas Chennu;Srivas Chennu;Paola Finoia;Paola Finoia;Evelyn Kamau;Judith Allanson

  • Thought Beyond Language Neural Dissociation of Algebra and Natural Language

    Martin M. Monti;Lawrence M. Parsons;Daniel N. Osherson

  • Consciousness is supported by near-critical slow cortical electrodynamics

    Unknown

  • Consciousness among delta waves: a paradox?

    Joel Frohlich;Daniel Toker;Martin M Monti

  • Thalamic and Extrathalamic Mechanisms of Consciousness after Severe Brain Injury

    Evan S. Lutkenhoff;Jeffrey Chiang;Luaba Tshibanda;Evelyn Kamau

  • The boundaries of language and thought in deductive inference

    Martin M. Monti;Lawrence M. Parsons;Daniel N. Osherson

  • Functional neuroanatomy of deductive inference: a language-independent distributed network.

    Martin M. Monti;Daniel N. Osherson;Michael J. Martinez;Lawrence M. Parsons

  • Dynamic change of global and local information processing in propofol-induced loss and recovery of consciousness.

    Martin M. Monti;Evan S. Lutkenhoff;Mikail Rubinov;Pierre Boveroux

  • Brain-computer interfaces for communication with nonresponsive patients.

    Lorina Naci;Martin M. Monti;Damian Cruse;Andrea Kübler

  • Thalamo-frontal connectivity mediates top-down cognitive functions in disorders of consciousness.

    Martin M. Monti;Matthew Rosenberg;Paola Finoia;Evelyn Kamau

  • Impaired consciousness is linked to changes in effective connectivity of the posterior cingulate cortex within the default mode network

    Julia Sophia Crone;Matthias Schurz;Matthias Schurz;Yvonne Höller;Jürgen Bergmann

  • Neuroimaging and the vegetative state: resolving the behavioral assessment dilemma?

    Martin M. Monti;Martin R. Coleman;Adrian M. Owen

  • Ultrasonic thalamic stimulation in chronic disorders of consciousness

    Joshua A Cain;Norman M Spivak;John P Coetzee;Julia S Crone

  • Dissociable endogenous and exogenous attention in disorders of consciousness.

    Srivas Chennu;Srivas Chennu;Paola Finoia;Paola Finoia;Evelyn Kamau;Martin M. Monti

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian M. Owen
Adrian M. Owen University of Western Ontario
Paul M. Vespa
Paul M. Vespa University of California, Los Angeles
John D. Pickard
John D. Pickard University of Cambridge
Daniel N. Osherson
Daniel N. Osherson Princeton University
Steven Laureys
Steven Laureys University of Liège
Lawrence M. Parsons
Lawrence M. Parsons University of Sheffield
Tristan A. Bekinschtein
Tristan A. Bekinschtein University of Cambridge
Keith J. Holyoak
Keith J. Holyoak University of California, Los Angeles
David K. Menon
David K. Menon University of Cambridge
Mélanie Boly
Mélanie Boly University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience opens doors to a variety of related fields, some of which can be pursued through flexible online education options. Prospective students aiming for clinical roles may consider psyd online programs, which focus on psychological practice rather than research.

If your interests include therapy and counseling, there are accredited lmft online programs (Licensed Marriage and Family Therapy) that offer both convenience and accelerated pace for quicker entry into the mental health field.

For those seeking undergraduate qualifications, achieving a bachelor degree online in 2 years can be a strategic move, especially if you want to fast-track your studies and begin your career sooner.

When considering your future, it is important to align your education with market demand. Some of the highest paying degrees intersect with specialized areas of neuroscience, such as data science, engineering, or healthcare – leading to rewarding and lucrative career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Martin M. Monti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles