World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Physics 80 3042 2889 56 55 227 19344

Mark Gieles publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Gieles between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Gieles published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2023. 20 of the 267 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2023. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 3 publications
2001 2026

267 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Gieles: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 4
2003 3
2004 7
2005 8
2006 9
2007 10
2008 16
2009 10
2010 10
2011 16
2012 15
2013 9
2014 7
2015 12
2016 8
2017 8
2018 16
2019 14
2020 13
2021 9
2022 9
2023 21
2024 12
2025 17
2026 3
Total 267
Download as CSV

Mark Gieles publication distribution in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Physics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Gieles sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 70 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 103–122 to 1,469+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 323–342 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,469 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 223–242 publications, is where this scientist sits. 103–122 publications: 7 scientists 123–142 publications: 10 scientists 143–162 publications: 31 scientists 163–182 publications: 35 scientists 183–202 publications: 53 scientists 203–222 publications: 81 scientists 223–242 publications: 85 scientists 243–262 publications: 112 scientists 263–282 publications: 114 scientists 283–302 publications: 126 scientists 303–322 publications: 136 scientists 323–342 publications: 162 scientists 343–362 publications: 155 scientists 363–382 publications: 156 scientists 383–402 publications: 134 scientists 403–422 publications: 145 scientists 423–442 publications: 147 scientists 443–462 publications: 131 scientists 463–482 publications: 131 scientists 483–502 publications: 116 scientists 503–522 publications: 106 scientists 523–542 publications: 103 scientists 543–562 publications: 87 scientists 563–582 publications: 84 scientists 583–602 publications: 94 scientists 603–622 publications: 70 scientists 623–642 publications: 76 scientists 643–662 publications: 60 scientists 663–682 publications: 54 scientists 683–702 publications: 60 scientists 703–722 publications: 48 scientists 723–742 publications: 64 scientists 743–762 publications: 48 scientists 763–782 publications: 37 scientists 783–802 publications: 43 scientists 803–822 publications: 34 scientists 823–842 publications: 36 scientists 843–862 publications: 32 scientists 863–882 publications: 32 scientists 883–902 publications: 31 scientists 903–922 publications: 25 scientists 923–942 publications: 15 scientists 943–962 publications: 24 scientists 963–982 publications: 13 scientists 983–1,002 publications: 21 scientists 1,003–1,022 publications: 21 scientists 1,023–1,042 publications: 16 scientists 1,043–1,062 publications: 9 scientists 1,063–1,082 publications: 19 scientists 1,083–1,102 publications: 11 scientists 1,103–1,122 publications: 17 scientists 1,123–1,142 publications: 11 scientists 1,143–1,162 publications: 7 scientists 1,163–1,182 publications: 4 scientists 1,183–1,202 publications: 10 scientists 1,203–1,222 publications: 8 scientists 1,223–1,242 publications: 16 scientists 1,243–1,262 publications: 4 scientists 1,263–1,282 publications: 10 scientists 1,283–1,302 publications: 5 scientists 1,303–1,322 publications: 7 scientists 1,323–1,342 publications: 4 scientists 1,343–1,362 publications: 8 scientists 1,363–1,382 publications: 6 scientists 1,383–1,402 publications: 7 scientists 1,403–1,422 publications: 3 scientists 1,423–1,442 publications: 4 scientists 1,443–1,462 publications: 4 scientists 1,463–1,468 publications: 3 scientists 1,469+ publications: 100 scientists
103–122 publications 1,469+

This scientist: 227 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,469 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Physics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,678 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
103–122 7
123–142 10
143–162 31
163–182 35
183–202 53
203–222 81
223–242 85 227
243–262 112
263–282 114
283–302 126
303–322 136
323–342 162
343–362 155
363–382 156
383–402 134
403–422 145
423–442 147
443–462 131
463–482 131
483–502 116
503–522 106
523–542 103
543–562 87
563–582 84
583–602 94
603–622 70
623–642 76
643–662 60
663–682 54
683–702 60
703–722 48
723–742 64
743–762 48
763–782 37
783–802 43
803–822 34
823–842 36
843–862 32
863–882 32
883–902 31
903–922 25
923–942 15
943–962 24
963–982 13
983–1,002 21
1,003–1,022 21
1,023–1,042 16
1,043–1,062 9
1,063–1,082 19
1,083–1,102 11
1,103–1,122 17
1,123–1,142 11
1,143–1,162 7
1,163–1,182 4
1,183–1,202 10
1,203–1,222 8
1,223–1,242 16
1,243–1,262 4
1,263–1,282 10
1,283–1,302 5
1,303–1,322 7
1,323–1,342 4
1,343–1,362 8
1,363–1,382 6
1,383–1,402 7
1,403–1,422 3
1,423–1,442 4
1,443–1,462 4
1,463–1,468 3
1,469+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Gieles D-index placement in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Physics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Gieles sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 59 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 185+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 167. Most scientists, 167, have 80–81 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 185 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 76 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 110 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 143 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 153 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 144 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 167 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 167 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 166 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 132 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 155 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 134 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 137 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 102 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 112 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 110 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 116 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 97 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 103 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 87 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 90 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 78 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 75 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 67 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 69 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 59 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 53 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 42 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 41 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 33 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 32 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 45 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 19 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 24 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 28 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 31 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 20 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 12 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 24 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 23 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 15 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 15 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 11 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 17 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 12 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 11 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 9 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 9 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 11 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 4 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 8 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 5 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 3 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 4 scientists 184 D-Index: 4 scientists 185+ D-Index: 99 scientists
70–71 D-Index 185+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 185 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Physics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,678 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 76
72–73 110
74–75 143
76–77 153
78–79 144
80–81 167 80
82–83 167
84–85 166
86–87 132
88–89 155
90–91 134
92–93 137
94–95 102
96–97 112
98–99 110
100–101 116
102–103 97
104–105 103
106–107 87
108–109 90
110–111 67
112–113 78
114–115 75
116–117 67
118–119 69
120–121 60
122–123 59
124–125 53
126–127 42
128–129 41
130–131 33
132–133 32
134–135 45
136–137 19
138–139 24
140–141 28
142–143 31
144–145 22
146–147 20
148–149 12
150–151 16
152–153 24
154–155 23
156–157 15
158–159 15
160–161 11
162–163 17
164–165 12
166–167 11
168–169 9
170–171 9
172–173 11
174–175 4
176–177 8
178–179 5
180–181 3
182–183 4
184 4
185+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Gieles is affiliated with the University of Barcelona in Spain and contributes extensively to the field of Physics and Astronomy. Their research primarily focuses on subfields such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Computational Mechanics, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, and Nuclear and High Energy Physics.

The scientist's work spans a wide array of topics within the discipline, including:

  • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
  • Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
  • Astro and Planetary Science

Mark Gieles has published extensively, with a significant presence in major scientific venues. Their most frequent publication platforms include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space Science Reviews
  • Physical review. D/Physical review. D.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark Gieles demonstrate contributions to a diverse range of astrophysical topics. Notable works include:

  • "Star Clusters Near and Far," 2020, Space Science Reviews
  • "The Physics of Star Cluster Formation and Evolution," 2020, Space Science Reviews
  • "Population synthesis of black hole binary mergers from star clusters," 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • "Merger rate of black hole binaries from globular clusters: Theoretical error bars and comparison to gravitational wave data from GWTC-2," 2020, Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
  • "N-enhancement in GN-z11: First evidence for supermassive stars nucleosynthesis in proto-globular clusters-like conditions at high redshift?," 2023, Astronomy and Astrophysics

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their research, frequently working with co-authors including V. Hénault-Brunet, Holger Baumgardt, C. Charbonnel, Fabio Antonini, and N. Bastian.

Best Publications

  • Binary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars

    H. Sana;S. E. de Mink;S. E. de Mink;A. de Koter;A. de Koter;N. Langer

  • Young Massive Star Clusters

    Simon F. Portegies Zwart;Stephen L.W. McMillan;Mark Gieles

  • An analytical description of the disruption of star clusters in tidal fields with an application to Galactic open clusters

    Henny Lamers;Mark Gieles;Nate Bastian;Holger Baumgardt

  • The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey I: Introduction and observational overview

    C. J. Evans;W. D. Taylor;V. Henault-Brunet;H. Sana

  • The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey. VIII. Multiplicity properties of the O-type star population

    H. Sana;A. de Koter;A. de Koter;S.E. de Mink;S.E. de Mink;P.R. Dunstall

  • An analytical description of the disruption of star clusters in tidal fields with an application to Galactic open clusters

    H. J. G. L. M. Lamers;M. Gieles;N. Bastian;H. Baumgardt

  • Precession of the Sagittarius stream

    V. Belokurov;S. E. Koposov;N. W. Evans;J. Peñarrubia

  • Early disc accretion as the origin of abundance anomalies in globular clusters

    N. Bastian;H. J. G. L. M. Lamers;S. E. de Mink;S. E. de Mink;S. N. Longmore

  • The Star Cluster Population of M51: II. Age distribution and relations among the derived parameters

    N. Bastian;M. Gieles;H.J.G.L.M. Lamers;R. de Grijs

  • The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey: I. Introduction and observational overview⋆

    Chris Evans;W. D. Taylor;V. Hénault-brunet;H. Sana

  • Star cluster disruption by giant molecular clouds

    M. Gieles;M. Gieles;S. F. Portegies Zwart;H. Baumgardt;E. Athanassoula

  • The life cycle of star clusters in a tidal field

    Mark Gieles;Douglas C. Heggie;HongSheng Zhao

  • An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst.

    F. R. N. Schneider;H. Sana;C. J. Evans;J. M. Bestenlehner;J. M. Bestenlehner

  • Disruption time scales of star clusters in different galaxies

    H.J.G.L.M. Lamers;M. Gieles;S.F. Portegies Zwart

  • The life cycle of star cluster in a tidal field

    Mark Gieles;Douglas C. Heggie;HongSheng Zhao

  • THE SAGITTARIUS STREAMS IN THE SOUTHERN GALACTIC HEMISPHERE

    Sergey E. Koposov;Sergey E. Koposov;V. Belokurov;N. W. Evans;G. Gilmore

  • The star cluster population of M 51 - II. Age distribution and relations among the derived parameters

    N. Bastian;M. Gieles;H. J. G. L. M. Lamers;R. A. Scheepmaker

  • Disruption time scales of star clusters in different galaxies

    Henny J. G. L. M. Lamers;Mark Gieles;Simon F. Portegies Zwart

  • The luminosity function of young star clusters: implications for the maximum mass and luminosity of clusters

    M. Gieles;S. S. Larsen;N. Bastian;N. Bastian;I. T. Stein

  • The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey XIX. B-type Supergiants - Atmospheric Parameters and Nitrogen Abundances to Investigate the Role of Binarity and the Width of the Main Sequence

    C. M. McEvoy;P. L. Dufton;C. J. Evans;V. M. Kalari;V. M. Kalari

Frequent Co-Authors

Nate Bastian
Nate Bastian Liverpool John Moores University
Hugues Sana
Hugues Sana KU Leuven
Chris Evans
Chris Evans UK Astronomy Technology Centre
A. de Koter
A. de Koter University of Amsterdam
D. J. Lennon
D. J. Lennon University of La Laguna
Holger Baumgardt
Holger Baumgardt University of Queensland
Paul A. Crowther
Paul A. Crowther University of Sheffield
Norbert Langer
Norbert Langer University of Bonn
Jorick S. Vink
Jorick S. Vink Armagh Observatory
Sergey E. Koposov
Sergey E. Koposov University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark Gieles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles