World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7233 6744 3915 3559 129 8194

Brian K. Martens publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brian K. Martens between 1983 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brian K. Martens published across 40 years, from 1983 to 2022, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 1997. 3 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 1997. 1983: 2 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 6 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 22 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 6 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 4 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication
1983 2022

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brian K. Martens: publications per year, 1983 to 2022
Year Publications
1983 2
1984 5
1985 2
1986 1
1987 1
1988 6
1989 5
1990 6
1991 1
1992 4
1993 5
1994 2
1995 2
1996 2
1997 22
1998 2
1999 4
2000 3
2001 1
2002 6
2003 1
2004 6
2005 3
2006 3
2007 5
2008 4
2009 3
2010 13
2011 2
2012 1
2013 2
2014 4
2015 2
2016 1
2017 4
2018 1
2019 3
2020 2
2021 2
2022 1
Total 145
Download as CSV

Brian K. Martens publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian K. Martens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 129
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Brian K. Martens D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian K. Martens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Brian K. Martens is affiliated with Syracuse University in the United States and contributes to research primarily within the fields of psychology and health professions. Their work spans several subfields, including clinical psychology, developmental and educational psychology, general health professions, social psychology, and safety research.

The scientist's research topics are diverse and focus on behavioral and psychological studies, mindfulness and compassion interventions, bullying, victimization and aggression, disability education and employment, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), mental health and patient involvement, and healthcare professionals' stress and burnout.

The following is a list of recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Brian K. Martens:

  • Meta-Analysis of Mindfulness-Based Program Soles of the Feet for Disruptive Behaviors, 2022, published in Behavior Modification
  • Effects of a Private Room Versus Group Setting on Math Test Performance of College Students with ADHD, 2020, published in Journal of Behavioral Education
  • Goal attainment among veterans with PTSD enrolled in peer-delivered whole health coaching: a multiple baseline design trial, 2021, published in Coaching An International Journal of Theory Research and Practice
  • Preference for variable over fixed delays to reinforcement: A demonstration of risk sensitivity during functional communication training., 2020, published in Behavior Analysis Research and Practice
  • Pediatric Prevention, 2020, published in Pediatric Clinics of North America

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Brian K. Martens include:

  • Adam J. Clawson
  • Emily L. Baxter
  • Joshua C. Felver
  • Tory L. Ash
  • Qiu Wang

Brian K. Martens has published in various venues, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of their research. Key publication outlets include:

  • Behavior Modification
  • Journal of Behavioral Education
  • Coaching An International Journal of Theory Research and Practice
  • Behavior Analysis Research and Practice
  • Pediatric Clinics of North America

The breadth of their research spans both theoretical and applied dimensions of behavioral sciences, with a focus also on interventions addressing mental health and educational challenges. Their work touches on the dynamics of risk sensitivity, mindfulness programs, and clinical outcomes in populations such as college students with ADHD and veterans with PTSD.

Best Publications

  • Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions.

    Brian K. Martens;Joseph C. Witt;Stephen N. Elliott;Dion X. Darveaux

  • Assessing the acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms

    Joseph C. Witt;Brian K Martens

  • A COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK PROCEDURES ON TEACHERS' TREATMENT IMPLEMENTATION INTEGRITY AND STUDENTS’ INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR IN SPECIAL EDUCATION CLASSROOMS

    Florence D. DiGennaro;Brian K. Martens;Ava E. Kleinmann

  • Factors affecting teachers' judgments of the acceptability of behavioral interventions: Time involvement, behavior problem severity, and type of intervention

    Joseph C. Witt;B.K. Martens;Stephen N. Elliott

  • A Model for Conducting a Functional Analysis of Academic Performance Problems

    Edward J. Daly;Brian K. Martens;Joseph C. Witt;Eric J. Dool

  • A Brief Experimental Analysis For Identifying Instructional Components Needed To Improve Oral Reading Fluency.

    Edward J. Daly;Brian K. Martens;Kendra R. Hamler;Eric J. Dool

  • A COMPARISON OF THREE INTERVENTIONS FOR INCREASING ORAL READING PERFORMANCE: APPLICATION OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL HIERARCHY

    Edward J. Daly;Brian K. Martens

  • Increasing treatment integrity through negative reinforcement: Effects on teacher and student behavior

    Florence D. DiGennaro;Brian K. Martens;Laura Lee McIntyre

  • Improving oral reading fluency: a brief experimental analysis of combining an antecedent intervention with consequences.

    Tanya L Eckert;Scott P Ardoin;Edward J Daly;Brian K Martens

  • Assessing pre-service teachers' training in empirically-validated behavioral instruction practices.

    John C. Begeny;Brian K. Martens

  • Varying Intervention Delivery in Response to Intervention: Confronting and Resolving Challenges With Measurement, Instruction, and Intensity

    Edward J. Daly;Brian K. Martens;David Barnett;Joseph C. Witt

  • Using Brief Functional Analysis to Select Interventions for Oral Reading

    Edward J. Daly;Brian K. Martens;Eric J. Dool;John M. Hintze

  • Fluent Reading as the Improvement of Stimulus Control: Additive Effects of Performance-Based Interventions to Repeated Reading on Students' Reading and Error Rates.

    Sandra M. Chafouleas;Brian K. Martens;Robin L. Dobson;Kristen S. Weinstein

  • The application of Herrnstein's law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl.

    Brian K. Martens;Jack L. Houk

  • Inclusionary Education in Italy A Literature Review and Call for More Empirical Research

    John C. Begeny;Brian K. Martens

  • Teacher Perceptions of School-Based Interventions

    Brian K. Martens;Reece L. Peterson;Joseph C. Witt;Sharon Cirone

  • The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: a demonstration of matching theory.

    Brian K. Martens;David G. Lochner;Susan Q. Kelly

  • Assisting Low-Performing Readers with a Group-Based Reading Fluency Intervention.

    John C. Begeny;Brian K. Martens

  • Using high-probability instruction sequences with fading to increase student compliance during transitions

    Scott P. Ardoin;Brian K. Martens;Laurie A. Wolfe

  • Identifying effective treatments from a brief experimental analysis: Using single-case design elements to aid decision making.

    Brian K. Martens;Tanya L. Eckert;Tracy A. Bradley;Scott P. Ardoin

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph C. Witt
Joseph C. Witt Louisiana State University
Tanya L. Eckert
Tanya L. Eckert Syracuse University
Derek D. Reed
Derek D. Reed University of Kansas
Stephen N. Elliott
Stephen N. Elliott Arizona State University
Sandra M. Chafouleas
Sandra M. Chafouleas University of Connecticut
Laura Lee McIntyre
Laura Lee McIntyre University of Oregon
Barbara H. Fiese
Barbara H. Fiese University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Thomas S. Critchfield
Thomas S. Critchfield Illinois State University
Thomas R. Kratochwill
Thomas R. Kratochwill University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens up diverse career pathways—including roles in counseling, research, education, and mental health services. Many students opt for online psychology programs, which offer flexibility and accessibility while preparing graduates for licensure and employment.

An important consideration is that licensure requirements for therapists can vary widely based on location. For example, Chesapeake licensed therapist education requirements include specific graduate coursework and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, those interested in practicing in Illinois should review the Chicago licensed therapist requirements to understand local standards.

In cities like Chula Vista, aspiring therapists must meet unique criteria; visit Chula Vista licensed therapist requirements for an overview. For those looking towards Ohio, Cincinnati licensed therapist education requirements highlight local rules for education, exams, and supervised experience.

Before choosing an online degree, it’s essential to research local licensure regulations to ensure your program aligns with your career goals and state guidelines.

Best Scientists Citing Brian K. Martens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles