World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4659 4313 2584 2336 190 9465

Sandra M. Chafouleas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sandra M. Chafouleas between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sandra M. Chafouleas published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2009. 14 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2009. 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications
1997 2025

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sandra M. Chafouleas: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 2
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 5
2003 4
2004 8
2005 6
2006 4
2007 10
2008 6
2009 14
2010 9
2011 7
2012 8
2013 13
2014 11
2015 9
2016 11
2017 5
2018 9
2019 6
2020 12
2021 13
2022 11
2023 11
2024 7
2025 7
Total 209
Download as CSV

Sandra M. Chafouleas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra M. Chafouleas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 190 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 190
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sandra M. Chafouleas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra M. Chafouleas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Sandra M. Chafouleas is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research covers multiple areas within psychology, social sciences, and health professions, with a significant focus on clinical psychology, education, and general health professions. The subfields of study for their work include developmental and educational psychology as well as social psychology.

The main topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Community Health and Development
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Child Abuse and Trauma

Chafouleas has contributed to a variety of journals and publication venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • School Mental Health
  • Education and Treatment of Children
  • Journal of School Health
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities
  • School Psychology

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • "Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): Translation into Action in K12 Education Settings," 2021, School Mental Health
  • "Comparing the initial impact of COVID-19 on burden and psychological distress among family caregivers of children with and without developmental disabilities," 2021, School Psychology

Other notable papers by Chafouleas have been authored by frequent co-authors including Jessica B. Koslouski, Amy M. Briesch, Emily A. Iovino, Marlene B. Schwartz, and Jacqueline M. Caemmerer. These collaborators have contributed repeatedly to advancing topics related to educational and developmental psychology with Chafouleas.

In recognition of their work, Sandra M. Chafouleas was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Toward a Blueprint for Trauma-Informed Service Delivery in Schools.

    Sandra M. Chafouleas;Austin H. Johnson;Stacy Overstreet;Natascha M. Santos

  • Trauma-Informed Schools: Introduction to the Special Issue

    Stacy Overstreet;Sandra M. Chafouleas

  • Review and Analysis of Literature on Self-Management Interventions to Promote Appropriate Classroom Behaviors (1988-2008).

    Amy M. Briesch;Sandra M. Chafouleas

  • Assessing influences on intervention implementation: revision of the usage rating profile-intervention.

    Amy M. Briesch;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Sabina Rak Neugebauer;T. Chris Riley-Tillman

  • Positive psychology goes to school: Are we there yet?

    Sheila M. Clonan;Sandra M. Chafouleas;James L. McDougal;T. Chris Riley-Tillman

  • An Application of the What Works Clearinghouse Standards for Evaluating Single-Subject Research: Synthesis of the Self-Management Literature Base

    Daniel M. Maggin;Amy M. Briesch;Sandra M. Chafouleas

  • Bullying: Considerations for defining and intervening in school settings

    Mahri J. Elinoff;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Kari A. Sassu

  • Foundation for the Development and Use of Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) to Assess and Evaluate Student Behavior

    Theodore J. Christ;T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Sandra M. Chafouleas

  • A Systematic Evaluation of Token Economies as a Classroom Management Tool for Students with Challenging Behavior.

    Daniel M. Maggin;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Katelyn M. Goddard;Austin H. Johnson

  • Direct Behavior Rating (DBR): An Emerging Method for Assessing Social Behavior Within a Tiered Intervention System

    Sandra M. Chafouleas;T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Theodore J. Christ

  • Generalizability theory: a practical guide to study design, implementation, and interpretation.

    Amy M. Briesch;Hariharan Swaminathan;Megan Welsh;Sandra M. Chafouleas

  • Interventions for Reading Problems: Designing and Evaluating Effective Strategies

    Edward J Daly;Sabina Neugebauer;Sandra Chafouleas;Christopher H Skinner

  • A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior ☆

    Daniel M. Maggin;Austin H. Johnson;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Laura M. Ruberto

  • Good, bad, or in‐between: How does the daily behavior report card rate?

    Sandra M. Chafouleas;T. Chris Riley-Tillman;James L. McDougal

  • Student Perceptions of School Climate as Predictors of Office Discipline Referrals

    Nicholas A. Gage;Alvin Larson;George Sugai;Sandra M. Chafouleas

  • Acceptability and Reported Use of Daily Behavior Report Cards among Teachers.

    Sandra M. Chafouleas;T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Kari A. Sassu

  • Introducing positive psychology: Finding a place within school psychology

    Sandra M. Chafouleas;Melissa A. Bray

  • Fluent Reading as the Improvement of Stimulus Control: Additive Effects of Performance-Based Interventions to Repeated Reading on Students' Reading and Error Rates.

    Sandra M. Chafouleas;Brian K. Martens;Robin L. Dobson;Kristen S. Weinstein

  • Direct Behavior Rating: A Review of the Issues and Research in Its Development

    Sandra M. Chafouleas

  • Examining the Agreement of Direct Behavior Ratings and Systematic Direct Observation Data for On-Task and Disruptive Behavior.

    T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Kari A. Sassu;Julie A. M. Chanese

Frequent Co-Authors

T. Chris Riley-Tillman
T. Chris Riley-Tillman University of Missouri
Amy M. Briesch
Amy M. Briesch Northeastern University
Theodore J. Christ
Theodore J. Christ University of Minnesota
D. Betsy McCoach
D. Betsy McCoach University of Connecticut
Melissa A. Bray
Melissa A. Bray University of Connecticut
Gregory A. Fabiano
Gregory A. Fabiano Florida International University
Thomas J. Kehle
Thomas J. Kehle University of Connecticut
Daniel M. Maggin
Daniel M. Maggin University of Illinois at Chicago
Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti
Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti University of Connecticut
Robert J. Volpe
Robert J. Volpe Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can lead to a range of rewarding careers, especially in counseling and therapy. One popular path is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). With the flexibility of online psychology degrees, it’s easier than ever to start working toward this goal—while balancing other commitments.

Requirements to become an MFT differ by state and even by city. For instance, you can review Oakland mft certification requirements and see how they differ from Oklahoma City mft certification requirements. In some regions, licensing may involve specific coursework, supervised clinical experience, or state exams.

Online degree programs can prepare students to meet a variety of standards, including Omaha mft education requirements and mft requirements in Orlando. Prospective students should research local criteria carefully. A flexible online degree can help you reach your career goals wherever you live.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra M. Chafouleas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles