World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
5093
World Ranking
11135
National Ranking
5825

Amy M. Briesch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy M. Briesch sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Amy M. Briesch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy M. Briesch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amy M. Briesch is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their research contributions are situated primarily in the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a focus on education and developmental and educational psychology. The work also spans clinical psychology, social psychology, and general health professions.

Their publication record includes investigations into child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, behavioral and psychological studies, early childhood education and development, bullying, victimization, and aggression, autism spectrum disorder research, education discipline and inequality, and the intersection of child development with digital technology.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Amy M. Briesch include:

  • Robert J. Volpe
  • Sandra M. Chafouleas
  • Jessica A. Hoffman
  • Eric Alan Common
  • Mark Matthew Buckman

Their research has been published in multiple academic venues, with several publications appearing in:

  • School Mental Health
  • Journal of School Psychology
  • Education and Treatment of Children
  • International Journal of School & Educational Psychology
  • School Psychology Review

Recent representative papers authored by Amy M. Briesch include:

  • Caregiver Perspectives on Schooling From Home During the Spring 2020 COVID-19 Closures, 2021, School Psychology Review
  • School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains, 2021, Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions

Other significant works associated with their research interests, though authored by collaborators, include:

  • Systematic Review of the Psychometric Evidence Supporting Use of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, Short Form (DASS-21) with Youth, 2024, Child & Youth Care Forum
  • Exploring Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Screening Approaches in U.S. Public School Districts, 2021, American Educational Research Journal
  • A Multisite Study of the Effect of Fidget Spinners on Academic Performance, 2020, Contemporary School Psychology

Best Publications

  • Evidence-Based Practices in Classroom Management: Considerations for Research to Practice.

    Brandi Simonsen;Sarah Fairbanks;Amy Briesch;Diane Myers

  • Review and Analysis of Literature on Self-Management Interventions to Promote Appropriate Classroom Behaviors (1988-2008).

    Amy M. Briesch;Sandra M. Chafouleas

  • Assessing influences on intervention implementation: revision of the usage rating profile-intervention.

    Amy M. Briesch;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Sabina Rak Neugebauer;T. Chris Riley-Tillman

  • An Application of the What Works Clearinghouse Standards for Evaluating Single-Subject Research: Synthesis of the Self-Management Literature Base

    Daniel M. Maggin;Amy M. Briesch;Sandra M. Chafouleas

  • Generalizability theory: a practical guide to study design, implementation, and interpretation.

    Amy M. Briesch;Hariharan Swaminathan;Megan Welsh;Sandra M. Chafouleas

  • Generalizability and Dependability of Behavior Assessment Methods to Estimate Academic Engagement: A Comparison of Systematic Direct Observation and Direct Behavior Rating.

    Amy M. Briesch;Sandra M. Chafouleas;T. Chris Riley-Tillman

  • Moving beyond assessment of treatment acceptability: An examination of the factor structure of the Usage Rating Profile—Intervention (URP-I).

    Sandra M. Chafouleas;Amy M. Briesch;T. Chris Riley-Tillman;D. Betsy McCoach

  • Generalizability and Dependability of Direct Behavior Ratings to Assess Social Behavior of Preschoolers.

    Sandra M. Chafouleas;Theodore J. Christ;T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Amy M. Briesch

  • An investigation of the generalizability and dependability of Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) to measure academic engagement and disruptive behavior of middle school students

    Sandra M. Chafouleas;Amy M. Briesch;T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Theodore J. Christ

  • An evaluation of observational methods for measuring response to classwide intervention

    Amy M. Briesch;Elizabeth M. Hemphill;Robert J. Volpe;Brian Daniels

  • Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Self-Management Interventions in Single-Case Research

    Amy M. Briesch;Jacquelyn M. Briesch

  • Reducing the prevalence of anxiety in children and adolescents: an evaluation of the evidence base for the FRIENDS for Life program

    Amy M. Briesch;Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti;Jacquelyn M. Briesch

  • A school practitioner's guide to using daily behavior report cards to monitor student behavior

    T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Amy M. Briesch

  • Generalizability and Dependability of Single-Item and Multiple-Item Direct Behavior Rating Scales for Engagement and Disruptive Behavior

    Robert J. Volpe;Amy M. Briesch

  • Examining Teachers’ Perceptions of Social-Emotional and Behavioral Referral Concerns

    Amy M. Briesch;Tyler D. Ferguson;Robert J. Volpe;Jacquelyn M. Briesch

  • Daily Behavior report cards and systematic direct observation: An investigation of the acceptability, reported training and use, and decision reliability among school psychologists

    T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Amy M. Briesch;Tanya L. Eckert

  • A Comparison of Rubrics for Identifying Empirically Supported Practices with Single-Case Research

    Daniel M. Maggin;Amy M. Briesch;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Tyler D. Ferguson

  • The Impact of Item Wording and Behavioral Specificity on the Accuracy of Direct Behavior Ratings (DBRs)

    T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Theodore Christ;Amy M. Briesch

  • The Impact of Observation Duration on the Accuracy of Data Obtained from Direct Behavior Rating (DBR).

    T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Theodore J. Christ;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Christina H. Boice-Mallach

  • Self-management interventions to reduce disruptive classroom behavior.

    Amy M. Briesch;Jacquelyn M. Briesch

  • Usage Rating Profile--Intervention; Revised

    Amy M. Briesch;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Sabina Rak Neugebauer;T. Chris Riley-Tillman

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra M. Chafouleas
Sandra M. Chafouleas University of Connecticut
Robert J. Volpe
Robert J. Volpe Northeastern University
T. Chris Riley-Tillman
T. Chris Riley-Tillman University of Missouri
D. Betsy McCoach
D. Betsy McCoach University of Connecticut
Julie Sarno Owens
Julie Sarno Owens Ohio University
Theodore J. Christ
Theodore J. Christ University of Minnesota
Ralf W. Schlosser
Ralf W. Schlosser Northeastern University
Gregory A. Fabiano
Gregory A. Fabiano Florida International University
Kathleen Lynne Lane
Kathleen Lynne Lane University of Kansas
Kenneth D. Gadow
Kenneth D. Gadow Stony Brook University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens a range of rewarding online degrees and career options, especially in fields focused on mental health and substance abuse counseling. Many students explore specialized online programs that prepare them for licensure and hands-on roles in community support and addiction recovery.

Pathways such as becoming a substance abuse counselor in Garland or learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Gilbert commonly require a bachelor’s or master’s degree in psychology or a related field. These online degrees support flexible study while preparing you for state-specific certification processes.

Each location may have unique requirements. For instance, Glendale substance abuse counselor certification requirements and Greensboro substance abuse counselor certification requirements provide clear guidelines on education, supervised experience, and exams.

Before you choose a degree, review your target state’s licensure rules. An online psychology program can be a practical first step toward a meaningful career in mental health services, addiction counseling, and community outreach.

Best Scientists Citing Amy M. Briesch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles