World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
72
Citations
25246
World Ranking
2032
National Ranking
227

Neuroscience

D-Index
79
Citations
28970
World Ranking
1659
National Ranking
169

Rebecca Elliott publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Elliott sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 301 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Rebecca Elliott D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Elliott sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Cognition
  • Neuroscience

Her primary areas of study are Neuroscience, Cognition, Cognitive psychology, Prefrontal cortex and Orbitofrontal cortex. The Caudate nucleus, Frontal lobe and Brain mapping research Rebecca Elliott does as part of her general Neuroscience study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Brain activity and meditation, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. Rebecca Elliott interconnects Emotional prosody and Clinical psychology, Mood in the investigation of issues within Cognition.

Her Cognitive psychology course of study focuses on Facial expression and Mania. In the subject of general Prefrontal cortex, her work in Ventromedial prefrontal cortex is often linked to Selection, thereby combining diverse domains of study. Her research integrates issues of Ventral striatum, Functional magnetic resonance imaging and Amygdala in her study of Orbitofrontal cortex.

Her most cited work include:

  • Dissociable Functions in the Medial and Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex: Evidence from Human Neuroimaging Studies (775 citations)
  • Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task (767 citations)
  • Dissociable Neural Responses in Human Reward Systems (650 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Rebecca Elliott mostly deals with Neuroscience, Cognition, Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Clinical psychology and Psychiatry. Her study in Orbitofrontal cortex, Amygdala, Prefrontal cortex and Brain mapping are all subfields of Neuroscience. The study incorporates disciplines such as Citalopram and Striatum in addition to Amygdala.

Her Cognition research incorporates themes from Audiology and Mood. Her Functional magnetic resonance imaging research incorporates elements of Cognitive psychology, Developmental psychology, Anterior cingulate cortex, Functional imaging and Facial expression. The concepts of her Clinical psychology study are interwoven with issues in Neuroticism, Personality, Depression and Anxiety.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Neuroscience (25.09%)
  • Cognition (20.79%)
  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (19.71%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Internal medicine (17.20%)
  • Clinical psychology (17.92%)
  • Oncology (8.96%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her main research concerns Internal medicine, Clinical psychology, Oncology, Cognition and Depression. The Oncology study combines topics in areas such as Cancer, Radiation therapy and Genetic risk factor. She mostly deals with Working memory in her studies of Cognition.

Her Depression research includes elements of Disease activity, MiRNA binding, Anxiety, Anterior cingulate cortex and Prefrontal cortex. Her study on Anterior cingulate cortex also encompasses disciplines like

  • Insula that connect with fields like Functional magnetic resonance imaging,
  • Citalopram, which have a strong connection to Amygdala. Her Amygdala research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Neural correlates of consciousness and Orbitofrontal cortex.

Between 2018 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Radiogenomics Consortium Genome-Wide Association Study Meta-Analysis of Late Toxicity After Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy. (23 citations)
  • REQUITE: A prospective multicentre cohort study of patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast, lung or prostate cancer (15 citations)
  • Regional default mode network connectivity in major depressive disorder: modulation by acute intravenous citalopram (14 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Cognition
  • Neuroscience

Rebecca Elliott mainly focuses on Internal medicine, Depression, Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Oncology and Clinical psychology. Her Internal medicine research integrates issues from Working memory, Cognition and Mood. Her study in the field of Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery also crosses realms of Lupus erythematosus.

Rebecca Elliott has included themes like Gyrus, Systematic review, Visual perception, Functional imaging and Maternal sensitivity in her Functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Rebecca Elliott interconnects Cancer, Breast cancer, Prostate cancer and Radiation therapy in the investigation of issues within Oncology. Her work deals with themes such as MiRNA binding, Endophenotype and rs6311, which intersect with Clinical psychology.

Best Publications

  • Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task

    Birgit A. Völlm;Alexander N. W. Taylor;Paul Richardson;Rhiannon Corcoran

  • Dissociable Functions in the Medial and Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex: Evidence from Human Neuroimaging Studies

    Rebecca Elliott;Raymond J. Dolan;Chris D. Frith

  • Executive functions and their disorders.

    Rebecca Elliott

  • Neural Activity Relating to Generation and Representation of Galvanic Skin Conductance Responses: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Hugo D. Critchley;Rebecca Elliott;Christopher J. Mathias;Raymond J. Dolan

  • Dissociable Neural Responses in Human Reward Systems

    Rebecca Elliott;Karl J. Friston;Raymond J. Dolan

  • Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study

    N R Horn;Mairead Dolan;Rebecca Elliott;John F W Deakin

  • Neuropsychological impairments in unipolar depression : the influence of perceived failure on subsequent performance

    R. Elliott;B. J. Sahakian;A. P. McKay;J. J. Herrod

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients

    Joseph Firth;Jack Cotter;Rebecca Elliott;Paul French

  • Differential Response Patterns in the Striatum and Orbitofrontal Cortex to Financial Reward in Humans: A Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Rebecca Elliott;Jana L. Newman;Olivia A. Longe;J. F. William Deakin

  • Cognitive Mechanisms of Treatment in Depression

    Jonathan P Roiser;Rebecca Elliott;Barbara J Sahakian

  • The Neural Basis of Mood-Congruent Processing Biases in Depression

    Rebecca Elliott;Judy S. Rubinsztein;Barbara J. Sahakian;Raymond J. Dolan

  • Aerobic Exercise Improves Cognitive Functioning in People With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Joseph Firth;Brendon Stubbs;Brendon Stubbs;Simon Rosenbaum;Davy Vancampfort

  • Effects of methylphenidate on spatial working memory and planning in healthy young adults

    R. Elliott;B. J. Sahakian;K. Matthews;A. Bannerjea

  • The neural response to emotional prosody, as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Rachel L.C. Mitchell;Rebecca Elliott;Martin Barry;Alan Cruttenden

  • Prefrontal dysfunction in depressed patients performing a complex planning task: a study using positron emission tomography.

    R. Elliott;S. C. Baker;R. D. Rogers;D. A. O'Leary

  • Affective cognition and its disruption in mood disorders.

    Rebecca Elliott;Roland Zahn;J F William Deakin;Ian M Anderson

  • Attention to pain localization and unpleasantness discriminates the functions of the medial and lateral pain systems.

    B. Kulkarni;D. E. Bentley;R. Elliott;P. Youell

  • Abnormal response to negative feedback in unipolar depression:evidence for a diagnosis specific impairment

    R Elliott;B J Sahakian;J J Herrod;T W Robbins

  • Neuropsychological evidence for frontostriatal dysfunction in schizophrenia

    R. Elliott;P. J. McKenna;T. W. Robbins;B. J. Sahakian

  • The effect of Citalopram pretreatment on neuronal responses to neuropsychological tasks in normal volunteers: an FMRI study.

    Cristina M Del-Ben;J F William Deakin;Shane Mckie;Nicola A Delvai

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian M. Anderson
Ian M. Anderson University of Manchester
Shane McKie
Shane McKie University of Manchester
Barbara J. Sahakian
Barbara J. Sahakian University of Cambridge
John Francis William Deakin
John Francis William Deakin University of Manchester
Alison M. Dunning
Alison M. Dunning University of Cambridge
Catharine M L West
Catharine M L West University of Manchester
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Raymond J. Dolan
Raymond J. Dolan University College London
John Suckling
John Suckling University of Cambridge
Gyorgy Bagdy
Gyorgy Bagdy Semmelweis University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary career options, many of which can be explored online. For those interested in merging neuroscience with social work, msw programs offer advanced knowledge in mental health and counseling—key areas of overlap with neuroscience.

If you’re considering a quicker route to start your career, accelerated psychology degree programs provide flexible and fast-paced learning experiences, often online, to build a solid foundation in brain and behavior studies.

For those who wish to become licensed counselors or pursue clinical practice, choosing cacrep accredited online counseling programs ensures a reputable and recognized education in the field. Budget-conscious students can also explore the cheapest online counseling degree options to minimize tuition costs while preparing for a meaningful career.

Exploring these related online pathways can complement neuroscience studies and expand potential career opportunities in health, research, and counseling sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca Elliott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles