World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
21001
World Ranking
19110
National Ranking
1726

Psychology

D-Index
74
Citations
20461
World Ranking
1884
National Ranking
212

Ian M. Anderson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian M. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 295 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ian M. Anderson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian M. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian M. Anderson is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a total of 39 publications. Within this domain, their work spans several subfields including Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research addresses a range of topics related to brain disorders and mental health, including:

  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Ian M. Anderson has co-authored frequently with several researchers, including:

  • J.F.W. Deakin
  • Zsófia Gál
  • Dóra Török
  • Xénia Gonda
  • Nóra Eszlári

Their publications have appeared in various venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Lancet Oncology
  • Nature Mental Health
  • Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • Tucatinib plus trastuzumab for chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, RAS wild-type unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer (MOUNTAINEER): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study (2023, The Lancet Oncology)
  • A Delphi-method-based consensus guideline for definition of treatment-resistant depression for clinical trials (2021, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with solid tumours harbouring specific activating HER2 mutations (DESTINY-PanTumor01): an international, phase 2 study (2024, The Lancet Oncology)
  • The prescriber's guide to classic MAO inhibitors (phenelzine, tranylcypromine, isocarboxazid) for treatment-resistant depression (2022, CNS Spectrums)
  • Cognitive function after electroconvulsive therapy for depression: relationship to clinical response (2020, Psychological Medicine)

In addition to journal articles, Ian M. Anderson has contributed to academic book publications. Notably, they have one book published by Cambridge University Press titled Seminars in General Adult Psychiatry (2024), which has been cited in other research.

Best Publications

  • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability.

    Ian M. Anderson

  • Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: A revision of the 2008 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines

    Anthony Cleare;Carmine Pariante;Allan Young;I M Anderson

  • Evidence-based pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A revision of the 2005 guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

    David S. Baldwin;David S. Baldwin;Ian M. Anderson;David J. Nutt;Christer Allgulander

  • Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders: recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

    David S. Baldwin;Ian M. Anderson;David J. Nutt;Borwin Bandelow

  • Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: A revision of the 2000 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines

    IM Anderson;IN Ferrier;RC Baldwin;PJ Cowen

  • Magnetic resonance imaging studies in unipolar depression: Systematic review and meta-regression analyses

    D. Arnone;A. M. McIntosh;K. P. Ebmeier;Marcus R Munafo

  • Antipsychotic-Related QTc Prolongation, Torsade de Pointes and Sudden Death

    Peter M. Haddad;Ian M. Anderson

  • Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: a revision of the 1993 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines:

    I. M. Anderson;D. J. Nutt;J. F. W. Deakin

  • Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants: a meta-analysis

    David Smith;Carrie Dempster;Julie Glanville;Nick Freemantle

  • Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement

    S. Mobini;S. Body;M.-Y. Ho;C. M. Bradshaw

  • Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis

    I M Anderson;B M Tomenson

  • Affective cognition and its disruption in mood disorders.

    Rebecca Elliott;Roland Zahn;J F William Deakin;Ian M Anderson

  • SSRIS versus tricyclic antidepressants in depressed inpatients: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability.

    Anderson Im

  • Systematic review and guide to selection of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

    J G Edwards;I Anderson

  • The efficacy of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors in depression: a meta-analysis of studies against tricyclic antidepressants.

    I.M. Anderson;B.M. Tomenson

  • Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression

    R. C. Culverhouse;N. L. Saccone;A. C. Horton;Y. Ma

  • The effect of Citalopram pretreatment on neuronal responses to neuropsychological tasks in normal volunteers: an FMRI study.

    Cristina M Del-Ben;J F William Deakin;Shane Mckie;Nicola A Delvai

  • State-dependent changes in hippocampal grey matter in depression.

    D. Arnone;Shane McKie;Rebecca Elliott;Gabriella Juhász;Gabriella Juhász

  • Relationship between 5-HT function and impulsivity and aggression in male offenders with personality disorders.

    M. Dolan;I. M. Anderson;J.F.W. Deakin

  • Meta-analytical studies on new antidepressants

    Ian M Anderson

  • Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression

    Robert C. Culverhouse;Nancy L. Saccone;Amy C. Horton;Yinjiao Ma

Frequent Co-Authors

Rebecca Elliott
Rebecca Elliott University of Manchester
Gyorgy Bagdy
Gyorgy Bagdy Semmelweis University
Shane McKie
Shane McKie University of Manchester
John Francis William Deakin
John Francis William Deakin University of Manchester
Xenia Gonda
Xenia Gonda Semmelweis University
Philip J. Cowen
Philip J. Cowen University of Oxford
Glyn Lewis
Glyn Lewis University College London
Heinz Grunze
Heinz Grunze Paracelsus Medical University
C. M. Bradshaw
C. M. Bradshaw University of Nottingham
Roland Zahn
Roland Zahn King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens doors to a wide range of career pathways—especially for those interested in becoming professional counselors. Accredited online programs allow you to study flexibly and efficiently, with some offering accelerated tracks to help you enter the workforce faster.

Each state has its own requirements for licensure, so it’s important to understand regional differences. For example, those searching for the shortest path to becoming a counselor in South Carolina can benefit from programs designed for quick completion. Similarly, shortest path to becoming a counselor in Tennessee programs offer specialized coursework and clear step-by-step licensure guidance.

In regions like South Dakota, aspiring professionals may look for South Dakota accelerated counseling programs to fast-track their studies. Meanwhile, if you’re interested in Texas, find out more about the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Texas through flexible online and hybrid options.

Whether you plan to become a school counselor, mental health specialist, or pursue advanced research, online psychology degrees provide adaptable pathways to launch your career efficiently and confidently—no matter where you live.

Best Scientists Citing Ian M. Anderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles