World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2877 2640 121 118 176 12256
Neuroscience 65 3179 2902 273 254 171 12156

Frank Rösler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frank Rösler between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frank Rösler published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2003. 8 of the 215 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2003. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 8 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 13 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 1 publication
1978 2025

215 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frank Rösler: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 2
1982 8
1983 0
1984 1
1985 3
1986 3
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 0
1993 7
1994 2
1995 4
1996 3
1997 6
1998 5
1999 9
2000 7
2001 4
2002 4
2003 15
2004 12
2005 7
2006 9
2007 9
2008 10
2009 15
2010 8
2011 13
2012 6
2013 1
2014 2
2015 4
2016 2
2017 1
2018 0
2019 3
2020 1
2021 1
2022 13
2023 3
2024 7
2025 1
Total 215
Download as CSV

Frank Rösler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Rösler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 176 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 176
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Frank Rösler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Rösler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Psychology and Cognitive Sciences

Overview

Frank Rösler is affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany and conducts research primarily in the field of mathematics. Their work spans various specialized areas including mathematical physics, cognitive neuroscience, computational theory and mathematics, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and developmental and educational psychology.

Their research topics cover several detailed subjects such as spectral theory in mathematical physics, matrix theory and algorithms, numerical methods in inverse problems, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, NMR spectroscopy and applications, quantum chaos and dynamical systems, and neurobiology of language and bilingualism.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Frank Rösler include:

  • Are words pre-activated probabilistically during sentence comprehension? Evidence from new data and a Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using publicly available data (2020, Neuropsychologia)
  • Understanding the Effects of Constraint and Predictability in ERP (2022, Neurobiology of Language)
  • Computing scattering resonances (2022, Journal of the European Mathematical Society)
  • Developmental experiences alter the temporal processing characteristics of the visual cortex: Evidence from deaf and hearing native signers (2022, European Journal of Neuroscience)
  • Universal algorithms for computing spectra of periodic operators (2022, Numerische Mathematik)

Frequent collaborators include Bruno Nicenboim, Shravan Vasishth, Kate Stone, Jonathan Ben-Artzi, and Marco Marletta.

The venues where Frank Rösler has frequently published comprise:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Neurobiology of Language

In recognition of contributions to psychology and cognitive sciences, Frank Rösler was awarded membership in the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina in 2001.

Best Publications

  • Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans

    Brigitte Röder;Wolfgang Teder-Sälejärvi;Anette Sterr;Frank Rösler

  • Speech processing activates visual cortex in congenitally blind humans.

    Brigitte Röder;Oliver Stock;Siegfried Bien;Helen Neville

  • Early Vision Impairs Tactile Perception in the Blind

    Brigitte Röder;Frank Rösler;Charles Spence

  • Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations

    Frank Rösler;Peter Pütz;Angela Friederici;Anja Hahne

  • Brain activation modulated by the comprehension of normal and pseudo-word sentences of different processing demands: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Brigitte Röder;Oliver Stock;Helen J. Neville;Siegfried Bien

  • Slow negative brain potentials as reflections of specific modular resources of cognition

    Frank Rösler;Martin Heil;Brigitte Röder

  • Parsing of Sentences in a Language with Varying Word Order: Word-by-Word Variations of Processing Demands Are Revealed by Event-Related Brain Potentials ☆ ☆☆ ★

    Frank Rösler;Thomas Pechmann;Judith Streb;Brigitte Röder

  • Auditory memory in congenitally blind adults: a behavioral-electrophysiological investigation

    Brigitte Röder;Frank Rösler;Helen J Neville

  • Lifespan development and the brain: The perspective of biocultural co-constructivism

    Paul B. Baltes;Patricia Ann Reuter-Lorenz;Frank Rösler

  • Event-related potentials during auditory and somatosensory discrimination in sighted and blind human subjects.

    Brigitte Röder;Frank Rösler;Erwin Hennighausen;Fritz Näcker

  • Theta and alpha oscillations during working-memory maintenance predict successful long-term memory encoding

    Patrick H. Khader;Kerstin Jost;Charan Ranganath;Frank Rösler

  • To Predict or Not to Predict: Influences of Task and Strategy on the Processing of Semantic Relations

    Dietmar Roehm;Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky;Frank Rösler;Matthias Schlesewsky

  • N400 Effects Reflect Activation Spread During Retrieval of Arithmetic Facts

    Michael Niedeggen;Frank Rösler

  • Event-related potentials during auditory language processing in congenitally blind and sighted people.

    Brigitte Röder;Frank Rösler;Helen J Neville

  • Early visual deprivation impairs multisensory interactions in humans.

    Lisa Putzar;Ines Goerendt;Kathrin Lange;Frank Rösler

  • Early processing stages are modulated when auditory stimuli are presented at an attended moment in time: an event-related potential study.

    Kathrin Lange;Frank Rösler;Brigitte Röder

  • Processing of incongruous mental calculation problems: Evidence for an arithmetic N400 effect

    Michael Niedeggen;Frank Rösler;Kerstin Jost

  • Memory for environmental sounds in sighted, congenitally blind and late blind adults: evidence for cross-modal compensation

    Brigitte Röder;Frank Rösler

  • Multisensory processing in the redundant-target effect: a behavioral and event-related potential study.

    Matthias Gondan;Birgit Niederhaus;Frank Rösler;Brigitte Röder

  • A correction method for DC drift artifacts

    Erwin Hennighausen;Martin Heil;Frank Rösler

Frequent Co-Authors

Brigitte Röder
Brigitte Röder Universität Hamburg
Martin Heil
Martin Heil Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Helen J. Neville
Helen J. Neville University of Oregon
Charan Ranganath
Charan Ranganath University of California, Davis
Denise Y. P. Henriques
Denise Y. P. Henriques York University
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Paul B. Baltes
Paul B. Baltes Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Shravan Vasishth
Shravan Vasishth University of Potsdam
Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford
Christiane M. Thiel
Christiane M. Thiel Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology extends beyond the classroom. There are a variety of online degrees available that can pave the way to rewarding roles, like counseling, mental health therapy, or research. Many graduates pursue professional licensure to work as therapists or counselors, and requirements can differ depending on location.

For instance, to meet Buffalo licensed therapist requirements, you'll need to complete a graduate degree, supervised clinical hours, and pass a recognized exam. Those interested in another region can check the Chandler licensed therapist requirements or review the licensed therapist requirements in Charlotte for specific state criteria. Requirements for the licensed therapist requirements in Chesapeake also highlight the importance of approved coursework and state licensing exams.

Before enrolling in any online psychology program, review both your career goals and the relevant state or city licensing standards. Proper research ensures your education aligns with licensure needs, opening doors to diverse and fulfilling pathways in mental health and psychology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Rösler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles