World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 104 333 303 152 130 326 41047

Alan G. Barbour publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alan G. Barbour between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alan G. Barbour published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 1989. 5 of the 362 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 1989. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 14 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 26 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 18 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 9 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1970 2025

362 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alan G. Barbour: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 1
1977 1
1978 1
1979 2
1980 2
1981 5
1982 4
1983 14
1984 7
1985 10
1986 8
1987 4
1988 8
1989 26
1990 9
1991 13
1992 18
1993 12
1994 11
1995 9
1996 9
1997 10
1998 9
1999 12
2000 9
2001 10
2002 4
2003 8
2004 11
2005 8
2006 11
2007 2
2008 3
2009 4
2010 5
2011 1
2012 6
2013 6
2014 11
2015 9
2016 9
2017 5
2018 2
2019 5
2020 6
2021 4
2022 1
2023 9
2024 2
2025 3
Total 362
Download as CSV

Alan G. Barbour publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan G. Barbour sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 325–334 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 326 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65 326
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Alan G. Barbour D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan G. Barbour sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19 104
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Alan G. Barbour is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Immunology and Microbiology, Medicine, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these broader domains, their work encompasses subfields such as Parasitology, Infectious Diseases, Genetics, Immunology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientific topics frequently addressed in their publications include Vector-borne infectious diseases, Viral Infections and Vectors, Immune Response and Inflammation, Bat Biology and Ecology Studies, Gut microbiota and health, Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research, and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock.

Alan G. Barbour has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • The Family Borreliaceae (Spirochaetales), a Diverse Group in Two Genera of Tick-Borne Spirochetes of Mammals, Birds, and Reptiles, 2021, Journal of Medical Entomology
  • An Infection-Tolerant Mammalian Reservoir for Several Zoonotic Agents Broadly Counters the Inflammatory Effects of Endotoxin, 2021, mBio
  • Autoimmunity to synovial extracellular matrix proteins in patients with postinfectious Lyme arthritis, 2023, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia miyamotoi seroprevalence in California blood donors, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • The infection-tolerant white-footed deermouse tempers interferon responses to endotoxin in comparison to the mouse and rat, 2023, eLife

Their work has appeared across multiple publication venues, with frequent contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), eLife, PLoS ONE, Journal of Medical Entomology, and mBio.

Alan G. Barbour collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including Ana Milovic, Jonathan V. Duong, Anthony D. Long, Gabriela Balderrama-Gutierrez, and A Mortazavi.

Best Publications

  • Lyme disease-a tick-borne spirochetosis?

    Willy Burgdorfer;Alan G. Barbour;Stanley F. Hayes;Jorge L. Benach

  • Isolation and cultivation of Lyme disease spirochetes.

    Barbour Ag

  • The Spirochetal Etiology of Lyme Disease

    Allen C. Steere;Robert L. Grodzicki;Arnold N. Kornblatt;Joseph E. Craft

  • Spirochetes isolated from the blood of two patients with Lyme disease.

    Jorge L. Benach;Edward M. Bosler;John P. Hanrahan;James L. Coleman

  • Biology of Borrelia species.

    A G Barbour;S F Hayes

  • The biological and social phenomenon of Lyme disease

    Alan G. Barbour;Durland Fish

  • Antigenic Variation in Lyme Disease Borreliae by Promiscuous Recombination of VMP-like Sequence Cassettes

    Jing Ren Zhang;John M. Hardham;Alan G. Barbour;Steven J Norris

  • Lyme disease spirochetes and ixodid tick spirochetes share a common surface antigenic determinant defined by a monoclonal antibody.

    A G Barbour;S L Tessier;W J Todd

  • Identification of an Uncultivable Borrelia Species in the Hard Tick Amblyomma americanum: Possible Agent of a Lyme Disease-like Illness

    Alan G. Barbour;Gary O. Maupin;Glenna J. Teltow;Carol J. Carter

  • Megabase-sized linear DNA in the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease agent

    M.S. Ferdows;A.G. Barbour

  • Linear plasmids of the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi have covalently closed ends

    Alan G. Barbour;Alan G. Barbour;Claude F. Garon

  • Heterogeneity of Major Proteins in Lyme Disease Borreliae: A Molecular Analysis of North American and European Isolates

    Alan G. Barbour;Ramona A. Heiland;Timothy R. Howe

  • Sequence typing reveals extensive strain diversity of the Lyme borreliosis agents Borrelia burgdorferi in North America and Borrelia afzelii in Europe

    Jonas Bunikis;Ulf Garpmo;Jean I Tsao;Johan Berglund

  • A Borrelia-specific monoclonal antibody binds to a flagellar epitope.

    A G Barbour;S F Hayes;R A Heiland;M E Schrumpf

  • Molecular analysis of linear plasmid‐encoded major surface proteins, OspA and OspB, of the Lyme disease spirochaete Borrelia burgdorferi

    S. Bergström;V. G. Bundoc;A. G. Barbour

  • Plasmid analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease agent.

    A G Barbour

  • The western black-legged tick, Ixodes pacificus: a vector of Borrelia burgdorferi.

    Willy Burgdorfer;Robert S. Lane;Alan G. Barbour;Robert A. Gresbrink

  • Niche partitioning of Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia miyamotoi in the same tick vector and mammalian reservoir species

    Alan G. Barbour;Jonas Bunikis;Bridgit Travinsky;Anne Gatewood Hoen

  • An ecological approach to preventing human infection: Vaccinating wild mouse reservoirs intervenes in the Lyme disease cycle

    Jean I. Tsao;J. Timothy Wootton;Jonas Bunikis;Maria Gabriela Luna

  • Variation in a major surface protein of Lyme disease spirochetes.

    A G Barbour;S L Tessier;S F Hayes

  • Profiling of Temperature-Induced Changes in Borrelia burgdorferi Gene Expression by Using Whole Genome Arrays

    Caroline Ojaimi;Chad Brooks;Sherwood Casjens;Patricia Rosa

  • Antigenic Variability of Borrelia burgdorferi

    Bettina Wilske;Vera Preac-Mursic;Günther Schierz;Renate Kühbeck

Frequent Co-Authors

Sven Bergström
Sven Bergström Umeå University
Louis A. Magnarelli
Louis A. Magnarelli Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station
Durland Fish
Durland Fish Yale University
Stanley F. Hayes
Stanley F. Hayes National Institutes of Health
John J. Dunn
John J. Dunn Brookhaven National Laboratory
Steven J. Norris
Steven J. Norris The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Tom G. Schwan
Tom G. Schwan National Institutes of Health
Patricia A. Rosa
Patricia A. Rosa National Institutes of Health
Peter J. Krause
Peter J. Krause Yale University
Claude F. Garon
Claude F. Garon National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths, many of which can be complemented by specialized online degrees. For those interested in healthcare, becoming a functional medicine nurse practitioner offers a unique blend of clinical skills and patient-centered care, often incorporating microbiological knowledge into treatment strategies.

Another promising field is medical coding, where professionals must understand healthcare data and terminologies. Achieving professional coder certification can significantly enhance job prospects in hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies.

For those drawn to the management side of healthcare, a career as a health information manager leverages microbiology knowledge in overseeing patient data and medical records. To pursue this path effectively, enrolling in reputable online health information management degree programs cahiim accredited ensures relevant accreditation and comprehensive training.

Exploring these online degrees and certifications can broaden your career options, linking microbiology expertise with dynamic roles in healthcare, technology, and patient management.

Best Scientists Citing Alan G. Barbour

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles