World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 10214 9586 5252 4852 269 24292

Ian C. Lavery publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ian C. Lavery between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ian C. Lavery published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2009. 1 of the 270 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2009. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 5 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 12 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 16 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 6 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1978 2025

270 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ian C. Lavery: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 3
1980 1
1981 5
1982 4
1983 3
1984 2
1985 7
1986 4
1987 12
1988 7
1989 5
1990 6
1991 5
1992 10
1993 16
1994 8
1995 2
1996 9
1997 8
1998 3
1999 1
2000 3
2001 5
2002 7
2003 5
2004 4
2005 4
2006 5
2007 9
2008 13
2009 17
2010 15
2011 15
2012 12
2013 8
2014 5
2015 6
2016 2
2017 5
2018 1
2019 6
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 270
Download as CSV

Ian C. Lavery publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian C. Lavery sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 269 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 269
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ian C. Lavery D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian C. Lavery sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ian C. Lavery is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States. Their research output includes contributions to the field of tracking technology and performer identification systems.

Among the recent papers authored, one notable publication is titled Inexpensive Colour Tracking to Overcome Performer ID Loss, published in 2020. This paper was presented through the venue of Zenodo, associated with the CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research. The paper addresses the challenge of maintaining performer identification using economical color tracking methods.

Ian C. Lavery frequently collaborates with Robert Pritchard. Their documented coauthorship shows involvement in at least one joint publication, specifically the aforementioned paper.

Their work has been published in the following venue:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

The scientist's research topics focus primarily on areas linked to performer tracking technologies, though specific subject fields have not been detailed in available records.

Best Publications

  • Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients

    Victor W. Fazio;Yehiel Ziv;James M. Church;John R. Oakley

  • Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients

    Andrea Vignali;Victor W Fazio;Ian C Lavery;Jeffrey W Milsom

  • Mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

    Michael L. Arvanitis;David G. Jagelman;Victor W. Fazio;Ian C. Lavery

  • Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy.

    Victor W. Fazio;Micheal G. O’Riordain;Ian C. Lavery;James M. Church

  • Laparoscopic colectomy: A critical appraisal

    P. M. Falk;R. W. Beart;S. D. Wexner;A. G. Thorson

  • Effect of resection margins on the recurrence of Crohn's disease in the small bowel. A randomized controlled trial.

    V W Fazio;F Marchetti;M Church;J R Goldblum

  • Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

    Matthew F. Kalady;Luiz Felipe de Campos-Lobato;Luca Stocchi;Daniel P. Geisler

  • Relationship Between Tumor Gene Expression and Recurrence in Four Independent Studies of Patients With Stage II/III Colon Cancer Treated With Surgery Alone or Surgery Plus Adjuvant Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin

    Michael J. O'Connell;Ian Lavery;Greg Yothers;Soonmyung Paik

  • Prospective, Age-Related Analysis of Surgical Results, Functional Outcome, and Quality of Life After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

    Conor P. Delaney;Victor W. Fazio;Feza H. Remzi;Jeff Hammel

  • Total mesorectal excision is not necessary for cancers of the upper rectum

    Francisco Lopez-Kostner;Ian C. Lavery;Graham R. Hool;Lisa A. Rybicki

  • Internal fistulas in diverticular disease.

    Rodney J. Woods;Ian C. Lavery;Victor W. Fazio;David G. Jagelman

  • Quantification of risk for pouch failure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery.

    Victor W. Fazio;Paris P. Tekkis;Feza Remzi;Ian C. Lavery

  • Dysplasia of the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: results of prospective evaluation after a minimum of ten years.

    Feza H. Remzi;Victor W. Fazio;Conor Patrick Delaney;Miriam Preen

  • Desmoid tumors in familial polyposis coli.

    I T Jones;D G Jagelman;V W Fazio;I C Lavery

  • A Meta-Analysis of Quality of Life for Abdominoperineal Excision of Rectum versus Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

    Julie A. Cornish;Henry S. Tilney;Alexander G. Heriot;Ian C. Lavery

  • Risk Factors for Diseases of Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis After Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis

    Bo Shen;Victor W. Fazio;Feza H. Remzi;Aaron Brzezinski

  • Recurrence after transanal excision of T1 rectal cancer: should we be concerned?

    Khaled M. Madbouly;Feza H. Remzi;Bulent A. Erkek;Anthony J. Senagore

  • Plasma Lysophosphatidylcholine Levels: Potential Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer

    Zhenwen Zhao;Yijin Xiao;Paul Elson;Haiyan Tan

  • Safety and longterm efficacy of strictureplasty in 314 patients with obstructing small bowel Crohn's disease.

    David W Dietz;Silvio Laureti;Scott A Strong;Tracy L Hull

  • A proposed classification of ileal pouch disorders and associated complications after restorative proctocolectomy.

    Bo Shen;Feza H. Remzi;Ian C. Lavery;Bret A. Lashner

Frequent Co-Authors

Victor W. Fazio
Victor W. Fazio Cleveland Clinic
James M. Church
James M. Church Columbia University
Feza H. Remzi
Feza H. Remzi New York University Langone Medical Center
Jeffrey W. Milsom
Jeffrey W. Milsom Cornell University
Bo Shen
Bo Shen Columbia University
Conor P. Delaney
Conor P. Delaney Cleveland Clinic
John R. Goldblum
John R. Goldblum Cleveland Clinic
Anthony J. Senagore
Anthony J. Senagore Central Michigan University
Kirk A. Easley
Kirk A. Easley Emory University
Graham Casey
Graham Casey University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For many students interested in medicine, online degree programs can offer flexible entry points and career advancement opportunities. If you’re seeking advanced practice roles, consider exploring the cheapest online dnp programs to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice affordably from accredited institutions.

Those looking to enter the workforce quickly might research options like the lpn accelerated program. These fast-track courses help students become Licensed Practical Nurses in less time while studying online.

Mental health professionals are in high demand, and the fastest pmhnp program allows registered nurses to specialize as Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners more quickly than traditional programs.

Alternatively, those with an interest in healthcare leadership can pursue a bachelors in health administration online. This degree prepares graduates for administrative and management roles across the healthcare sector.

Whether your goal is clinical practice or healthcare management, online programs offer diverse pathways into the medical field, enabling career flexibility and progression.

Best Scientists Citing Ian C. Lavery

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles