World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 107 6298 5925 3358 3115 575 39047

James M. Church publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James M. Church between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James M. Church published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 65 publications in 2025. 78 of the 684 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 65. Peak 65 publications in 2025. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 29 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 41 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 65 publications
1976 2025

684 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James M. Church: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 2
1986 2
1987 2
1988 4
1989 1
1990 3
1991 7
1992 13
1993 10
1994 6
1995 10
1996 9
1997 11
1998 11
1999 9
2000 15
2001 12
2002 15
2003 20
2004 23
2005 21
2006 8
2007 9
2008 17
2009 18
2010 28
2011 29
2012 24
2013 21
2014 24
2015 24
2016 20
2017 22
2018 18
2019 41
2020 26
2021 25
2022 18
2023 26
2024 13
2025 65
Total 684
Download as CSV

James M. Church publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Church sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 575 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 575
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

James M. Church D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Church sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 107
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James M. Church is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a notable emphasis on Oncology and Surgery, as well as related subfields including Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Epidemiology.

The main topics of their work cover:

  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
  • Diverticular Disease and Complications
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease

James M. Church has contributed extensively to several frequent publication venues, including:

  • Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
  • ANZ Journal of Surgery
  • Gastroenterology
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Carol A. Burke
  • David Liska
  • Matthew F. Kalady
  • Gautam Mankaney
  • Brandie Heald

Recent notable papers published by James M. Church include:

  • Variation in the risk of colorectal cancer in families with Lynch syndrome: a retrospective cohort study, 2021, The Lancet Oncology
  • Eflornithine plus Sulindac for Prevention of Progression in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer Position statement on multigene panel testing for patients with colorectal cancer and/or polyposis, 2020, Familial Cancer
  • Using chatbots to screen for heritable cancer syndromes in patients undergoing routine colonoscopy, 2020, Journal of Medical Genetics
  • Surveillance pouchoscopy for dysplasia: Cleveland Clinic Ileoanal Pouch Anastomosis Database, 2020, British journal of surgery

Best Publications

  • Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients

    Victor W. Fazio;Yehiel Ziv;James M. Church;John R. Oakley

  • Guidelines on Genetic Evaluation and Management of Lynch Syndrome: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

    Francis M. Giardiello;John I. Allen;Jennifer E. Axilbund;C. Richard Boland

  • Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: Quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence

    Todd H. Rockwood;James M. Church;James W. Fleshman;Robert L. Kane

  • ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes.

    Sapna Syngal;Randall E. Brand;James M. Church;Francis M. Giardiello

  • Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

    Douglas K. Rex;John H. Bond;Sidney Winawer;Theodore R. Levin

  • Serrated Lesions of the Colorectum: Review and Recommendations From an Expert Panel

    Douglas K. Rex;Dennis J. Ahnen;John A. Baron;Kenneth P. Batts

  • Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index.

    Todd H. Rockwood;James M. Church;James W. Fleshman;Robert L. Kane

  • Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients

    Andrea Vignali;Victor W Fazio;Ian C Lavery;Jeffrey W Milsom

  • ASCO/SSO Review of Current Role of Risk-Reducing Surgery in Common Hereditary Cancer Syndromes

    José G. Guillem;William C. Wood;Jeffrey F. Moley;Andrew Berchuck

  • Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised)

    Rectal Surgeons: Joe J. Tjandra

  • Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy.

    Victor W. Fazio;Micheal G. O’Riordain;Ian C. Lavery;James M. Church

  • Effect of resection margins on the recurrence of Crohn's disease in the small bowel. A randomized controlled trial.

    V W Fazio;F Marchetti;M Church;J R Goldblum

  • Metachronous Colorectal Cancer Risk for Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation Carriers: The Advantage of More Extensive Colon Surgery

    Susan Parry;Susan Parry;Aung Ko Win;Bryan Parry;Finlay A Macrae

  • Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy

    Peter W. Marcello;Jeffrey W. Milsom;S. K. Wong;Katherine A. Hammerhofer

  • Prospective, Age-Related Analysis of Surgical Results, Functional Outcome, and Quality of Life After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

    Conor P. Delaney;Victor W. Fazio;Feza H. Remzi;Jeff Hammel

  • Use of infliximab within 3 months of ileocolonic resection is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes in Crohn's patients.

    Kweku A. Appau;Victor W. Fazio;Bo Shen;James M. Church

  • Dysplasia of the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: results of prospective evaluation after a minimum of ten years.

    Feza H. Remzi;Victor W. Fazio;Conor Patrick Delaney;Miriam Preen

  • Loop Ileostomy Closure After Restorative Proctocolectomy: Outcome in 1,504 Patients

    Kutt Sing Wong;Feza H. Remzi;Emre Gorgun;Susana Arrigain

  • Meta-analysis of observational studies of ileorectal versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis.

    O Aziz;T Athanasiou;V W Fazio;R J Nicholls

  • Practice Parameters for Colon Cancer

    Daniel Otchy;Neil H. Hyman;Clifford Simmang;Thomas Anthony

Frequent Co-Authors

Victor W. Fazio
Victor W. Fazio Cleveland Clinic
Ian C. Lavery
Ian C. Lavery Cleveland Clinic
Feza H. Remzi
Feza H. Remzi New York University Langone Medical Center
Jeffrey W. Milsom
Jeffrey W. Milsom Cornell University
Graham Casey
Graham Casey University of Virginia
Rocio Lopez
Rocio Lopez Cleveland Clinic
Conor P. Delaney
Conor P. Delaney Cleveland Clinic
Sapna Syngal
Sapna Syngal Harvard Medical School
Charis Eng
Charis Eng Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine
Randall W. Burt
Randall W. Burt University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine or healthcare doesn’t always follow a traditional path. There are several related online degrees that can open doors to diverse opportunities in the industry. For those interested in healthcare leadership, an accelerated healthcare administration degree online provides a fast-track to management roles within hospitals or clinics.

Registered nurses looking to advance can benefit from rn to np bridge programs, which allow nurses to earn a nurse practitioner credential more efficiently. Nutrition is also a growing field, and earning a nutrition degree online prepares students for roles in wellness, education, or clinical settings.

Finally, for those interested in high-level healthcare management, accredited mha programs offer the credentials needed for executive positions. These online options provide flexibility and accessibility, making it easier to advance your medical or healthcare career while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Church

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles