What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Finance
- Microeconomics
- Hedge fund
Her primary scientific interests are in Institutional investor, Shareholder, Monetary economics, Accounting and Corporate governance.
Her research on Institutional investor concerns the broader Finance.
Her work in the fields of Third market and Market liquidity overlaps with other areas such as Institution and Capitalization.
Her studies deal with areas such as Volatility, Incentive, Mutual fund and Uptick rule as well as Monetary economics.
The Equity research Laura T. Starks does as part of her general Accounting study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Identity, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.
She merges Corporate governance with Empirical evidence in her study.
Her most cited work include:
- Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation (1320 citations)
- Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors (1055 citations)
- Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund Industry (937 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Laura T. Starks focuses on Institutional investor, Monetary economics, Corporate governance, Financial economics and Mutual fund.
Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Executive compensation, Value, Convergence, Financial system and Hedge fund.
Her Monetary economics study combines topics in areas such as Investment strategy, Investment, Earnings and Portfolio.
In the subject of general Corporate governance, her work in Shareholder is often linked to Empirical evidence, thereby combining diverse domains of study.
Her work carried out in the field of Financial economics brings together such families of science as Econometrics, Leverage, Cash flow and Equity.
Her study on Mutual fund also encompasses disciplines like
- Open-end fund which connect with Fund administration and Manager of managers fund,
- Closed-end fund that intertwine with fields like Finance and Global assets under management.
She most often published in these fields:
- Institutional investor (32.06%)
- Monetary economics (28.24%)
- Corporate governance (19.85%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Institutional investor (32.06%)
- Equity (10.69%)
- Monetary economics (28.24%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Laura T. Starks spends much of her time researching Institutional investor, Equity, Monetary economics, Climate risk and Financial economics.
Her Institutional investor research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Public economics and Risk management.
Laura T. Starks combines subjects such as Divestment and Portfolio with her study of Public economics.
Her Equity study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Stock market.
Her research integrates issues of Voting, Opt-out, Hedge fund and Shareholder in her study of Monetary economics.
Her Financial economics research incorporates themes from Earnings and Demand shock.
Between 2016 and 2021, her most popular works were:
- The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors (60 citations)
- Sentiment Metrics and Investor Demand (29 citations)
- Corporate ESG Profiles and Investor Horizons (28 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Finance
- Microeconomics
- Hedge fund
Financial economics, Institutional investor, Risk management, Relation and Corporate governance are her primary areas of study.
Her work on Momentum as part of general Financial economics research is often related to SAFER and Work, thus linking different fields of science.
Her Institutional investor research includes elements of Divestment, Public economics, Equity and Portfolio.
Affect, Executive compensation, Econometrics, Computer science and Incentive are fields of study that intersect with her Relation study.
Corporate governance is frequently linked to Earnings in her study.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
