D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

Geert Bekaert

Columbia University
United States

Economics and Finance

USA

2023

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking

Economics and Finance D-index 94 Citations 54,215 244 World Ranking 88 National Ranking 72

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

2023 - Research.com Economics and Finance in United States Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study Geert Bekaert is best known for:

Finance
Market liquidity
Financial economics

His multidisciplinary approach integrates Financial economics and Capital asset pricing model in his work. He merges many fields, such as Capital asset pricing model and Financial economics, in his writings. He frequently studies issues relating to Interest rate and Monetary economics. Geert Bekaert connects Finance with Dividend in his research. Econometrics is closely attributed to Volatility (finance) in his work. He connects Volatility (finance) with Implied volatility in his research. Implied volatility is closely attributed to Econometrics in his research. Geert Bekaert integrates several fields in his works, including Law and Equity (law). He undertakes interdisciplinary study in the fields of Equity (law) and Law through his works.

His most cited work include:

Time-Varying World Market Integration (1619 citations)
Foreign Speculators and Emerging Equity Markets (1553 citations)
Does financial liberalization spur growth? (1472 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date

Much of his study explores Econometrics relationship to Volatility (finance) and Capital asset pricing model. His Finance study frequently links to other fields, such as Emerging markets, Volatility (finance), Financial market, Bond, Capital asset pricing model and Dividend. Geert Bekaert integrates many fields in his works, including Financial market and Finance. His study deals with a combination of Financial economics and Portfolio. Borrowing concepts from Financial economics, he weaves in ideas under Portfolio. By researching both Monetary economics and Macroeconomics, Geert Bekaert produces research that crosses academic boundaries. Geert Bekaert integrates Macroeconomics and Monetary economics in his research. In his works, he undertakes multidisciplinary study on Law and Equity (law). In his papers, Geert Bekaert integrates diverse fields, such as Equity (law) and Law.

Geert Bekaert most often published in these fields:

Financial economics (64.75%)
Monetary economics (54.92%)
Econometrics (53.28%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

Econometrics (66.67%)
Monetary economics (55.56%)
Financial economics (44.44%)

In recent works Geert Bekaert was focusing on the following fields of study:

Geert Bekaert integrates Econometrics and Panel data in his studies. Geert Bekaert conducted interdisciplinary study in his works that combined Panel data and Econometrics. He combines topics linked to Us dollar with his work on Monetary economics. His research on Us dollar frequently links to adjacent areas such as Monetary economics. He connects Financial economics with Capital asset pricing model in his research. He integrates Capital asset pricing model with Risk premium in his research. In his research, he undertakes multidisciplinary study on Risk premium and Expected utility hypothesis. Geert Bekaert performs integrative study on Expected utility hypothesis and Risk aversion (psychology). His research on Risk aversion (psychology) frequently links to adjacent areas such as Financial economics.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

On the global financial market integration “swoosh” and the trilemma (55 citations)
The Time Variation in Risk Appetite and Uncertainty (49 citations)
Good Carry, Bad Carry (27 citations)

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.