World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John H. Pemberton

John H. Pemberton

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 10159 9535 5228 4829 338 29320

John H. Pemberton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John H. Pemberton between 1955 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John H. Pemberton published across 71 years, from 1955 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2010. 4 of the 348 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1955 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2010. 1955: 3 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 1 publication 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 6 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 12 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1955 2025

348 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John H. Pemberton: publications per year, 1955 to 2025
Year Publications
1955 3
1956 0
1957 0
1958 1
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 2
1982 1
1983 4
1984 1
1985 6
1986 4
1987 12
1988 5
1989 9
1990 9
1991 11
1992 11
1993 12
1994 9
1995 7
1996 5
1997 14
1998 14
1999 12
2000 13
2001 7
2002 4
2003 8
2004 6
2005 10
2006 10
2007 13
2008 13
2009 15
2010 16
2011 11
2012 6
2013 7
2014 4
2015 4
2016 9
2017 16
2018 5
2019 3
2020 5
2021 1
2022 4
2023 2
2024 2
2025 2
Total 348
Download as CSV

John H. Pemberton publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John H. Pemberton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 338 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 338
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John H. Pemberton D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John H. Pemberton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John H. Pemberton is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed significantly to the field of medicine, with a specific focus on endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism. Their research encompasses 27 publications primarily within the field of medicine, with particular interest in subfields such as endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, surgery, genetics, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and physiology.

Their work addresses several key topics including diabetes management and research, pancreatic function and diabetes, diabetes and associated disorders, hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients, diabetes related cardiovascular risks and lipoproteins, cardiovascular function and risk factors, as well as nutrition and health in aging.

Frequent publication venues for John H. Pemberton include:

  • Endocrine Abstracts
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons
  • Preprints.org
  • Journal of Clinical Pathology
  • Digestive Surgery

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Pemberton include:

  • Assessment of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK HbA1c testing: implications for diabetes management and diagnosis (2021), Journal of Clinical Pathology
  • Assessing Malnutrition Before Major Oncologic Surgery: One Size Does Not Fit All (2020), Journal of the American College of Surgeons
  • Surgical Management of Idiopathic Perianal Fistulas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2021), Digestive Surgery
  • International Organization for the Study of IBD Recommendations for Surgery in Patients With IBD During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic (2020), Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
  • Innovative solution or cause for concern? The use of continuous glucose monitors in people not living with diabetes: A narrative review (2024), Diabetic Medicine

Among frequent collaborators are Louise Collins, Zhanna Oganesova, Adrian Brown, Ruth Krone, and Nicholas P. McKenna, reflecting a range of joint research efforts spanning multiple study areas within medicine.

Best Publications

  • Pouchitis After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Pouchitis Disease Activity Index

    William J. Sandborn;William J. Tremaine;Kenneth P. Batts;John H. Pemberton

  • American Gastroenterological Association Technical Review on Constipation

    Adil E. Bharucha;John H. Pemberton;G. Richard Locke

  • J ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long‐term outcome in 1310 patients

    A. P. Meagher;R. Farouk;R. R. Dozois;K. A. Kelly

  • A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn's perianal fistulas

    David A. Schwartz;Maurits J. Wiersema;Kika M. Dudiak;J.G. Fletcher

  • Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: Report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society

    Bert Messelink;Thomas Benson;Bary Berghmans;Kari Bø

  • Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results.

    John H. Pemberton;Keith A. Kelly;Robert W. Beart;Roger R. Dozois

  • Pouchitis and extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

    J L Lohmuller;J H Pemberton;R R Dozois;D Ilstrup

  • Early postoperative complications are not increased in patients with Crohn's disease treated perioperatively with infliximab or immunosuppressive therapy

    Jean Frédéric Colombel;Edward V Loftus;William J Tremaine;John H Pemberton

  • Results at up to 20 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.

    D. Hahnloser;J. H. Pemberton;B. G. Wolff;D. R. Larson

  • Decreased interstitial cell of Cajal volume in patients with slow-transit constipation

    Chong–Liang He;Larry Burgart;Linan Wang;John Pemberton

  • Functional disorders of the anus and rectum.

    William E. Whitehead;A. Wald;N. E. Diamant;P. Enck

  • Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Rectum

    Salman Zaheer;John H. Pemberton;Ridzuan Farouk;Roger R. Dozois

  • Effect of infliximab on short-term complications in patients undergoing operation for chronic ulcerative colitis.

    Chelliah R. Selvasekar;Robert R. Cima;David W. Larson;Eric J. Dozois

  • AGA technical review on constipation

    G.Richard Locke;John H. Pemberton;Sidney F. Phillips

  • American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement: guidelines on constipation.

    G.Richard Locke;John H. Pemberton;Sidney F. Phillips

  • The long-term effect of adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma on bowel function

    C. F. Kollmorgen;A. P. Meagher;B. G. Wolff;J. H. Pemberton

  • Long-term results of lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure with particular reference to incidence of fecal incontinence.

    Denis C. N. K. Nyam;John H. Pemberton

  • Long-term results of surgery for chronic constipation

    Denis C. N. K. Nyam;John H. Pemberton;Duane M. Ilstrup;Doris M. Rath

  • Scintigraphic measurement of regional gut transit in idiopathic constipation

    Todd Stivland;Michael Camilleri;Mario Vassallo;Maritza Proano

  • Functional outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.

    Ridzuan Farouk;John H. Pemberton;Bruce G. Wolff;Roger R. Dozois

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce G. Wolff
Bruce G. Wolff Mayo Clinic
Roger R. Dozois
Roger R. Dozois Mayo Clinic
Edward V. Loftus
Edward V. Loftus Mayo Clinic
Dirk R. Larson
Dirk R. Larson Mayo Clinic
William J. Sandborn
William J. Sandborn University of California, San Diego
Duane M. Ilstrup
Duane M. Ilstrup Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens the door to various related fields that complement or expand your opportunities in healthcare. Many students are now considering online degrees for flexibility and accelerated learning.

For those interested in leadership or administrative roles, there are healthcare administration accelerated degree programs available online. These fast-track options can help you move quickly into management positions within healthcare organizations.

Nurses looking to advance can benefit from asn to nurse practitioner programs. These bridge programs are designed to help registered nurses earn advanced degrees, increasing their scope of practice and earning potential.

Nutrition is another booming field in healthcare. Consider pursuing a nutrition degree online to prepare for careers in clinical nutrition, public health, or wellness coaching without needing to relocate.

Those interested in hospital or healthcare system management can explore top online mha programs that are cahme accredited. These accredited programs ensure you receive a high-quality education recognized by employers.

Best Scientists Citing John H. Pemberton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles