World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
50049
World Ranking
9490
National Ranking
4895

David A. Lieberman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Lieberman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 500 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David A. Lieberman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Lieberman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Lieberman is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with extensive work in oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, pathology and forensic medicine, surgery, and epidemiology.

Their research topics cover a broad range within colorectal and gastrointestinal health, including:

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Genetic Factors in Colorectal Cancer
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Diverticular Disease and Complications
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment

David A. Lieberman has published numerous papers, with notable recent works including:

  • Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, 2020, Gastroenterology
  • Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, 2020, The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, 2020, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Endoscopic Removal of Colorectal Lesions-Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, 2020, Gastroenterology
  • Endoscopic Removal of Colorectal Lesions: Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, 2020, The American Journal of Gastroenterology

The venues where Lieberman frequently publishes include:

  • Gastroenterology
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • UNC Libraries

Collaborations have been an integral part of their career. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Jason A. Dominitz
  • Samir Gupta
  • Aasma Shaukat
  • Douglas J. Robertson
  • Thomas S. Redding

In addition to journal publications, David A. Lieberman has also contributed to book literature, with at least one book titled Learning and Memory published by Cambridge University Press in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

    Bernard Levin;David A Lieberman;Beth McFarland;Kimberly S Andrews

  • Use of Colonoscopy to Screen Asymptomatic Adults for Colorectal Cancer

    David A. Lieberman;David G. Weiss;John H. Bond;Dennis J. Ahnen

  • Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi‐Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology*†

    Bernard Levin;David A. Lieberman;Beth McFarland;Robert A. Smith

  • Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Screening and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

    David A. Lieberman;Douglas K. Rex;Sidney J. Winawer;Francis M. Giardiello

  • Guidelines on Genetic Evaluation and Management of Lynch Syndrome: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

    Francis M. Giardiello;John I. Allen;Jennifer E. Axilbund;C. Richard Boland

  • Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

    Douglas K. Rex;C. Richard Boland;Jason A. Dominitz;Francis M. Giardiello

  • Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

    Douglas K. Rex;John H. Bond;Sidney Winawer;Theodore R. Levin

  • Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

    Samir Gupta;David Lieberman;Joseph C. Anderson;Carol A. Burke

  • Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology

    Douglas K. Rex;David A. Johnson;David A. Lieberman;Randall W. Burt

  • The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps.

    Douglas K. Rex;Charles Kahi;Michael O'Brien;T.R. Levin

  • Recommendations on fecal immunochemical testing to screen for colorectal neoplasia: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer

    Douglas J. Robertson;Douglas J. Robertson;Jeffrey K. Lee;C. Richard Boland;Jason A. Dominitz

  • A Pooled Analysis of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Diagnoses After Colonoscopic Polypectomy

    María Elena Martínez;John A. Baron;David A. Lieberman;Arthur Schatzkin

  • Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

    Cesare Hassan;Enrique Quintero;Jean Marc Dumonceau;Jaroslaw Regula

  • Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia.

    Philip Schoenfeld;Philip Schoenfeld;Philip Schoenfeld;Brooks Cash;Brooks Cash;Andrew Flood;Richard Dobhan;Richard Dobhan;Richard Dobhan

  • Risk Factors for Advanced Colonic Neoplasia and Hyperplastic Polyps in Asymptomatic Individuals

    David A. Lieberman;Sheila Prindiville;David G. Weiss;Walter Willett

  • Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa.

    Shin ei Kudo;René Lambert;John I. Allen;Hiroaki Fujii

  • Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy

    Douglas B. Nelson;Kenneth R. McQuaid;John H. Bond;David A. Lieberman

  • Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography.

    David Lieberman;Matthew Moravec;Jennifer Holub;Leann Michaels

  • European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis : Overview and introduction to the full Supplement publication.

    L. Von Karsa;J. Patnick;J. Patnick;N. Segnan;W. Atkin

  • Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

    Douglas K. Rex;Charles J. Kahi;Bernard Levin;Robert A. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas K. Rex
Douglas K. Rex Indiana University
Jason A. Dominitz
Jason A. Dominitz United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Prateek Sharma
Prateek Sharma University of Kansas
Brooks D. Cash
Brooks D. Cash The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Gary W. Falk
Gary W. Falk University of Pennsylvania
Dennis J. Ahnen
Dennis J. Ahnen University of Colorado Denver
Theodore R. Levin
Theodore R. Levin Kaiser Permanente
John J. Vargo
John J. Vargo Cleveland Clinic
Elizabeth R. Hauser
Elizabeth R. Hauser Duke University
C. Richard Boland
C. Richard Boland University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens doors to a variety of rewarding pathways, many of which can be entered through flexible online programs. Degree options are not limited to traditional roles for doctors and nurses but also include fields like healthcare administration, pharmacy, and advanced clinical practice.

If you're interested in healthcare management or leadership, consider enrolling in an online health management degree. These programs offer knowledge in policy, finance, and operations, and can be both accessible and affordable.

For those seeking advanced leadership, the cheapest master's in healthcare administration options provide rigorous coursework in organizational strategies, patient safety, and health systems—all from the convenience of your home.

Clinical professionals aiming to specialize further may explore the best online dnp programs. A Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree prepares nurses to take on advanced roles in clinical leadership or education.

Those interested in pharmaceutical sciences can also benefit from online pharmacist programs, which train students for crucial roles in patient care, drug therapy management, and pharmacy administration.

Researching these online pathways can help you find an educational route that fits your career goals, budget, and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Lieberman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles