World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 17840 16768 8902 8228 394 31872

John M. Inadomi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John M. Inadomi between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John M. Inadomi published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2013. 25 of the 444 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2013. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 30 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 49 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 13 publications
1986 2025

444 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John M. Inadomi: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 2
1998 5
1999 5
2000 9
2001 12
2002 5
2003 22
2004 6
2005 10
2006 12
2007 18
2008 19
2009 30
2010 20
2011 16
2012 17
2013 49
2014 15
2015 19
2016 10
2017 22
2018 9
2019 10
2020 12
2021 15
2022 13
2023 33
2024 12
2025 13
Total 444
Download as CSV

John M. Inadomi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Inadomi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 394 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 394
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John M. Inadomi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Inadomi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John M. Inadomi is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States and has a significant research output in medicine, particularly within the fields of surgery, oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, pathology and forensic medicine, and general health professions.

Their recent research contributions include publications on colorectal, gastric, and esophageal cancers, among other gastroenterological topics. Notable papers include:

  • Screening and prevention of colorectal cancer, 2021, BMJ
  • An Approach to the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Gastric Cancer in the United States, 2021, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Computational modelling suggests that Barrett's oesophagus may be the precursor of all oesophageal adenocarcinomas, 2020, Gut
  • AGA Institute Rapid Review and Recommendations on the Role of Pre-Procedure SARS-CoV-2 Testing and Endoscopy, 2020, Gastroenterology
  • Model-Based Estimation of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2021, JAMA Network Open

Their work frequently appears in prominent publication venues, including:

  • Gastroenterology (26 publications)
  • JAMA (22 publications)
  • UNC Libraries (7 publications)
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (5 publications)
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (4 publications)

John M. Inadomi has collaborated extensively with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Michael Berkwits
  • Preeti Malani
  • Mary Mcdermott
  • Christopher Muth
  • Jody Zylke

Their main fields of study encompass medicine with a focused concentration on surgery, oncology, and respiratory medicine, as well as pathology and forensic medicine. Subfields include surgical techniques and oncology research.

Their research covers diverse topics such as:

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies

Best Publications

  • Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis.

    Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao;Arun J. Sanyal;Norman D. Grace;William D. Carey

  • Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis.

    Peter A. Banks;Martin L. Freeman;Ronnie Fass;Darren S. Baroni

  • American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening 2008

    Douglas K Rex;David A Johnson;Joseph C Anderson;Phillip S Schoenfeld

  • Diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a consensus document

    Antoni Rimola;Guadalupe García-Tsao;Miquel Navasa;Laura J.V. Piddock

  • National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement: management of hepatitis B.

    Michael Floyd Sorrell;Edward A. Belongia;Jose Costa;Ilana F. Gareen

  • American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett's esophagus.

    Stuart J Spechler;Prateek Sharma;Rhonda F Souza

  • American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett's esophagus.

    Stuart J. Spechler;Prateek Sharma;Rhonda F. Souza;John M. Inadomi

  • American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on Initial Management of Acute Pancreatitis.

    Seth D. Crockett;Sachin Wani;Timothy B. Gardner;Yngve Falck-Ytter;Yngve Falck-Ytter

  • Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.

    Amnon Sonnenberg;Fabiola Delcò;John M. Inadomi

  • Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa.

    Shin ei Kudo;René Lambert;John I. Allen;Hiroaki Fujii

  • Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Competing Strategies

    John M. Inadomi;Sandeep Vijan;Nancy K. Janz;Angela Fagerlin

  • AGA Institute Review of Endoscopic Sedation

    Lawrence B. Cohen;Mark H. DeLegge;James Aisenberg;Joel V. Brill

  • The Impact of a Celebrity Promotional Campaign on the Use of Colon Cancer Screening: The Katie Couric Effect

    Peter Cram;A. Mark Fendrick;John Inadomi;Mark E. Cowen;Mark E. Cowen

  • ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing

    Ikuo Hirano;Joel E. Richter;Ronnie Fass;Darren S. Baroni

  • Consensus Statements for Management of Barrett's Dysplasia and Early-Stage Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Based on a Delphi Process

    Cathy Bennett;Nimish Vakil;Jacques Bergman;Rebecca Harrison

  • Screening and surveillance for Barrett esophagus in high-risk groups: a cost-utility analysis.

    John M Inadomi;Richard Sampliner;Jesper Lagergren;David Lieberman

  • American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Use of Thiopurines, Methotrexate, and Anti–TNF-α Biologic Drugs for the Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Inflammatory Crohn's Disease

    Themistocles Dassopoulos;Shahnaz Sultan;Yngve T. Falck–Ytter;John M. Inadomi

  • Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Lukejohn W. Day;Lukejohn W. Day;Annette Kwon;John M. Inadomi;Louise C. Walter

  • Lansoprazole treatment of patients with chronic idiopathic laryngitis: a placebo-controlled trial.

    Hashem B El-Serag;Patty Lee;Anna Buchner;John M Inadomi

  • Step-down management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

    John M. Inadomi;John M. Inadomi;Roula Jamal;Roula Jamal;Glen H. Murata;Glen H. Murata;Richard M. Hoffman;Richard M. Hoffman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason A. Dominitz
Jason A. Dominitz United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Hal Morgenstern
Hal Morgenstern University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard E. Sampliner
Richard E. Sampliner University of Arizona
William D. Chey
William D. Chey University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Henry D. Appelman
Henry D. Appelman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hashem B. El-Serag
Hashem B. El-Serag Baylor College of Medicine
Nicholas J. Shaheen
Nicholas J. Shaheen University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Carolyn M. Rutter
Carolyn M. Rutter RAND Corporation
Yngve Falck-Ytter
Yngve Falck-Ytter Case Western Reserve University
Eric Vittinghoff
Eric Vittinghoff University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The path to a medical career in the USA isn't limited to earning a traditional MD. Today, students are choosing from a growing number of related online degrees and alternative career pathways in healthcare. These options offer flexible learning opportunities and can lead to well-paying, in-demand roles.

Aspiring pharmacists can pursue an online pharmacist degree for a comprehensive education in drug therapy, patient care, and pharmacy practice—all through convenient online coursework.

Those interested in the digital side of healthcare may consider rhit programs online. These programs train students in health information management, preparing them for roles that ensure data integrity and patient privacy.

For individuals seeking quick entry into the workforce, a low cost medical coding and billing online program offers fast, affordable training for vital administrative positions in clinics, hospitals, and insurance companies.

Registered nurses aiming to advance their careers might enroll in one of the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs. These degrees open doors to higher-level clinical roles and increased autonomy in patient care.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Inadomi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles