World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael B. Wallace

Michael B. Wallace

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 98 9007 8454 4637 4289 1133 30268

Michael B. Wallace publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael B. Wallace between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael B. Wallace published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 26.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 87 publications in 2009. 110 of the 1,331 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 87. Peak 87 publications in 2009. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 24 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 28 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 49 publications 2007: 43 publications 2008: 69 publications 2009: 87 publications 2010: 53 publications 2011: 58 publications 2012: 54 publications 2013: 48 publications 2014: 53 publications 2015: 60 publications 2016: 69 publications 2017: 54 publications 2018: 59 publications 2019: 61 publications 2020: 62 publications 2021: 73 publications 2022: 42 publications 2023: 73 publications 2024: 52 publications 2025: 58 publications
1975 2025

1,331 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael B. Wallace: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 3
1989 3
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 6
1999 7
2000 24
2001 17
2002 12
2003 15
2004 28
2005 30
2006 49
2007 43
2008 69
2009 87
2010 53
2011 58
2012 54
2013 48
2014 53
2015 60
2016 69
2017 54
2018 59
2019 61
2020 62
2021 73
2022 42
2023 73
2024 52
2025 58
Total 1,331
Download as CSV

Michael B. Wallace publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael B. Wallace sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,121–1,140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,133 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49 1,133
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael B. Wallace D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael B. Wallace sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 98
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael B. Wallace is primarily affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their research focuses on various areas within medicine, particularly oncology, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, and cancer research.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Michael B. Wallace has contributed to several publications with high relevance in the medical field, especially in gastroenterology and cancer detection. Recent papers authored by them include:

  • Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Miss Rate of Colorectal Neoplasia, 2022, Gastroenterology

Other influential papers relevant to their broader research area but authored by other researchers include:

  • Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial, 2020, Gastroenterology
  • Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy experience: lessons from two randomised trials, 2021, Gut
  • Prospective, Multi-Institutional, Real-Time Next-Generation Sequencing of Pancreatic Cyst Fluid Reveals Diverse Genomic Alterations That Improve the Clinical Management of Pancreatic Cysts, 2022, Gastroenterology

Michael B. Wallace frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Amit Rastogi
  • Prasad G. Iyer
  • Karthik Ravi
  • Ara Sahakian
  • Brian Weston

The venues in which Michael B. Wallace has published or frequently contributed include:

  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Gastroenterology
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Endoscopy
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Their research intersects multiple medical fields, with a strong emphasis on oncology and advanced imaging techniques involving radiomics and machine learning, aiming to enhance cancer diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Best Publications

  • Invasive mediastinal staging of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition).

    Frank C. Detterbeck;Michael A. Jantz;Michael Wallace;Johan Vansteenkiste

  • Detection of preinvasive cancer cells

    V. Backman;M. B. Wallace;L. T. Perelman;J. T. Arendt

  • Fluorescence, reflectance, and light-scattering spectroscopy for evaluating dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus

    Irene Georgakoudi;Brian C. Jacobson;Jacques Van Dam;Vadim Backman

  • Observation of periodic fine structure in reflectance from biological tissue: A new technique for measuring nuclear size distribution

    L. T. Perelman;V. Backman;M. Wallace;G. Zonios

  • Minimally invasive endoscopic staging of suspected lung cancer.

    Michael B. Wallace;Jorge M. S. Pascual;Massimo Raimondo;Timothy A. Woodward

  • Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial.

    Alessandro Repici;Matteo Badalamenti;Roberta Maselli;Loredana Correale

  • ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps.

    Barham K. Abu Dayyeh;Nirav C Thosani;Vani Konda;Michael B. Wallace

  • Endoscopic Tri-Modal Imaging for Detection of Early Neoplasia in Barrett’s Oesophagus; A multi-centre feasibility study using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging incorporated in one endoscopy system.

    Wouter Lodewijk Curvers;Rajvinder Singh;Louis-Michel Wong Kee Song;Herbert C Wolfsen

  • Endoscopic detection of dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus using light-scattering spectroscopy

    Michael B. Wallace;Michael B. Wallace;Lev T. Perelman;Vadim Backman;James M. Crawford

  • Real-time increased detection of neoplastic tissue in Barrett's esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: final results of an international multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial

    Prateek Sharma;Alexander R. Meining;Emmanuel Coron;Charles J. Lightdale

  • The safety of intravenous fluorescein for confocal laser endomicroscopy in the gastrointestinal tract.

    M. B. Wallace;A. Meining;M. I. Canto;P. Fockens

  • Prospective, controlled tandem endoscopy study of narrow band imaging for dysplasia detection in Barrett's Esophagus

    Herbert C. Wolfsen;Julia E. Crook;Murli Krishna;Sami R. Achem

  • Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy: Technical Advances and Clinical Applications

    Helmut Neumann;Ralf Kiesslich;Michael B. Wallace;Markus F. Neurath

  • Interobserver agreement among endosonographers for the diagnosis of neoplastic versus non-neoplastic pancreatic cystic lesions

    Nuzhat A. Ahmad;Michael L. Kochman;Michael L. Kochman;Colleen Brensinger;Colleen Brensinger;William R. Brugge;William R. Brugge

  • Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration.

    S. Varadarajulu;M. Fraig;N. Schmulewitz;S. Roberts

  • Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy.

    M. Wallace;Gregory Y. Lauwers;Y. Chen;E. Dekker

  • Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy

    Michael B. Wallace;Timothy Kennedy;Valerie Durkalski;Mohamed A. Eloubeidi

  • The reliability of EUS for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: interobserver agreement among experienced endosonographers

    Michael B. Wallace;Robert H. Hawes;Valerie Durkalski;Amitabh Chak

  • An analysis of multiple staging management strategies for carcinoma of the esophagus: computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound, positron emission tomography, and thoracoscopy/laparoscopy

    Michael B Wallace;Paul J Nietert;Craig Earle;Mark J Krasna

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert H. Hawes
Robert H. Hawes Orlando Health
Prateek Sharma
Prateek Sharma University of Kansas
Kenneth K. Wang
Kenneth K. Wang Mayo Clinic
Ulas Bagci
Ulas Bagci Northwestern University
Alessandro Repici
Alessandro Repici Humanitas University
Douglas K. Rex
Douglas K. Rex Indiana University
Paul Fockens
Paul Fockens University of Amsterdam
Nicholas J. Talley
Nicholas J. Talley University of Newcastle Australia
Tom Vercauteren
Tom Vercauteren King's College London
Keith D. Lindor
Keith D. Lindor Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens many academic and professional doors. For those interested in healthcare administration, there are several online healthcare administration programs that offer foundational knowledge in managing medical facilities and improving patient care.

Students seeking advanced leadership roles often opt for a master's degree. There are many cheap mha programs that provide affordable and flexible pathways to higher-level careers in healthcare management.

For those aiming to become clinical leaders or educators, pursuing the highest level of nursing with one of the least expensive dnp programs can be a great step. These programs are designed for experienced nurses seeking to influence practice, policy, and patient outcomes.

If your interests lie in pharmacy, there are also online pharmd programs that deliver a comprehensive pharmaceutical education online, preparing graduates for licensure and diverse pharmacy careers.

Exploring these options can help you discover new opportunities and specialized roles in the vast and evolving field of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Michael B. Wallace

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles