World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert H. Hawes

Robert H. Hawes

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
37517
World Ranking
7090
National Ranking
3728

Robert H. Hawes publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert H. Hawes sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 679 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert H. Hawes D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert H. Hawes sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert H. Hawes is affiliated with Orlando Health in the United States and has published extensively in the field of medicine, with a particular focus on surgery, oncology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields, including pancreatic and hepatic oncology, gallbladder and bile duct disorders, and pancreatitis pathology and treatment.

Their recent scholarly output includes research papers published between 2020 and 2023. Notable publications include:

  • Equivalent performance of single-use and reusable duodenoscopes in a randomised trial, 2020, Gut
  • Comparing Needles and Methods of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy to Optimize Specimen Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy for Patients With Pancreatic Masses in a Randomized Trial, 2020, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Lumen-apposing metal stent placement for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: predictors of adverse events, 2020, Gut
  • Upfront endoscopic necrosectomy or step-up endoscopic approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis (DESTIN): a single-blinded, multicentre, randomised trial, 2023, The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology
  • Use of Artificial Intelligence to Reduce Radiation Exposure at Fluoroscopy-Guided Endoscopic Procedures, 2020, The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Frequent co-authors contributing to collaborating research include:

  • Ji Young Bang
  • Shyam Varadarajulu
  • Udayakumar Navaneethan
  • Paul Fockens
  • D. Nageshwar Reddy

Robert H. Hawes has contributed to multiple publications in several key venues in gastroenterology and related fields. The primary publication outlets for their work include:

  • Digestive Endoscopy
  • Gut
  • Endoscopy
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Their research topics center predominantly around pancreatic and hepatic oncology research, gallbladder and bile duct disorders, pancreatitis pathology and treatment, pediatric hepatobiliary diseases and therapies, esophageal and gastrointestinal pathology, gastrointestinal disorders and treatments, and cancer genomics and diagnostics.

This breadth of work reflects a concentration on clinical and translational medicine related to the digestive system and oncology, with emphasis on diagnostic methods, treatment modalities, and procedural safety.

Best Publications

  • Radiofrequency Ablation in Barrett's Esophagus with Dysplasia

    Nicholas J Shaheen;Prateek Sharma;Bergein F. Overholt;Herbert C. Wolfsen

  • Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience.

    D B Williams;A V Sahai;L Aabakken;I D Penman

  • Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia.

    P. J. Pasricha;R. Hawari;I. Ahmed;J. Chen

  • Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy : a prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts

    Stuart Sherman;Thomas A. Ruffolo;Robert H. Hawes;Glen A. Lehman

  • Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

    Paul R. Tarnasky;Yuko Y. Palesch;John T. Cunningham;Patrick D. Mauldin

  • Submucosal Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy: A Novel Experimental Approach for the Treatment of Achalasia

    Pankaj J. Pasricha;Rami Hawari;Ijaz Ahmed;Peter B. Cotton

  • Endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy using linear array and radial scanning endosonography

    Frank G. Gress;Robert H. Hawes;Thomas J. Savides;Steven O. Ikenberry

  • Alcohol Consumption, Cigarette Smoking, and the Risk of Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis

    Dhiraj Yadav;Robert H. Hawes;Randall E. Brand;Michelle A. Anderson

  • Durability of Radiofrequency Ablation in Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia

    Nicholas J Shaheen;Bergein F. Overholt;Richard E. Sampliner;Herbert C. Wolfsen

  • Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model.

    Sanjay B. Jagannath;Sergey V. Kantsevoy;Cheryl A. Vaughn;Sydney S.C. Chung

  • Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model.

    Sergey V. Kantsevoy;Sanjay B. Jagannath;Hideaki Niiyama;Sydney S.C. Chung

  • Pancreatic cyst fluid DNA analysis in evaluating pancreatic cysts: a report of the PANDA study

    Asif Khalid;Maliha Zahid;Sydney D. Finkelstein;Julia K. LeBlanc

  • Endosonographic differentiation of benign and malignant stromal cell tumors

    Amitabh Chak;Marcia Irene Canto;Thomas Rösch;Hans J. Dittler

  • Colonic Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Persons With Negative Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Influence of Age, Gender, and Family History

    Douglas K. Rex;Glen A. Lehman;Thomas M. Ulbright;Jennefer J. Smith

  • Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with chronic abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin

    M. J. Wiersema;R. H. Hawes;G. A. Lehman;M. L. Kochman

  • Prospective assessment of the ability of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose, exclude, or establish the severity of chronic pancreatitis found by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

    Anand V. Sahai;Matt Zimmerman;Lars Aabakken;Paul R. Tarnasky

  • Role of EUS in the preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer: a large single-center experience.

    Frank G. Gress;Robert H. Hawes;Thomas J. Savides;Steven O. Ikenberry

  • Endoscopic Ultrasonography, Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Guided by Endoscopic Ultrasonography, and Computed Tomography in the Preoperative Staging of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Comparison Study

    Frank G. Gress;Thomas J. Savides;Alan Sandler;Kenneth Kesler

  • Standard endoscopy with random biopsies versus narrow band imaging targeted biopsies in Barrett's oesophagus: a prospective, international, randomised controlled trial

    Prateek Sharma;Robert H Hawes;Ajay Bansal;Ajay Bansal;Neil Gupta;Neil Gupta

  • Type of pain, pain-associated complications, quality of life, disability and resource utilisation in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study

    Daniel K. Mullady;Dhiraj Yadav;Stephen T. Amann;Michael R. O'Connell

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter B. Cotton
Peter B. Cotton Medical University of South Carolina
Shyam Varadarajulu
Shyam Varadarajulu AdventHealth Orlando
Stuart Sherman
Stuart Sherman Indiana University
David C. Whitcomb
David C. Whitcomb University of Pittsburgh
Randall E. Brand
Randall E. Brand University of Pittsburgh
Amitabh Chak
Amitabh Chak Case Western Reserve University
Peter A. Banks
Peter A. Banks Brigham and Women's Hospital
Glen A. Lehman
Glen A. Lehman Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering a career in medicine, a variety of related online degrees can offer alternative pathways or specialized credentials. Nursing remains a popular option, and many prospective students wonder, do I need to take the TEAS test for LPN programs? Some schools are now offering admissions without this requirement, making nursing more accessible.

If you are interested in the administrative side of healthcare, there are excellent healthcare administration degree programs online. These accelerated options prepare you for leadership roles in clinical and hospital settings with a flexible learning schedule.

Registered nurses may want to advance their careers through ADN to FNP bridge programs. These online pathways help nurses become Family Nurse Practitioners more efficiently, often without leaving the workforce.

For those interested in prevention and wellness, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition supports careers in dietetics, public health, and education. These related degrees provide flexible, reputable alternatives for entering and advancing within the healthcare field outside a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Robert H. Hawes

Trending Scientists