World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
47
Citations
15511
World Ranking
18551
National Ranking
7577

Stanley F. Hayes publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley F. Hayes sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 80 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Stanley F. Hayes D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley F. Hayes sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stanley F. Hayes is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research is primarily positioned within the fields of Immunology and Microbiology as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. These areas feature prominently in their scholarly output, with a focus on specialized subfields including Molecular Biology, Microbiology, and Immunology.

The scientist has contributed to topics such as Biochemical and Structural Characterization, Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities, and Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins. These themes represent the main content and direction of their research efforts.

Stanley F. Hayes has published work in at least one venue, notably UNC Libraries. Their recent paper titled "Leukocyte infection by the granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent is linked to expression of a selectin ligand" appeared in 2020 at UNC Libraries.

The work involves collaboration with a set of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Jesse L. Goodman
  • Curtis M. Nelson
  • Marina B. Klein
  • Brent W. Weston

This team-based approach to research suggests a multidisciplinary interaction within their projects, which are documented in scholarly articles. The number of citations on their recent publication stands at zero, indicating either a recent publication date or limited citation accrual so far.

Best Publications

  • Lyme disease-a tick-borne spirochetosis?

    Willy Burgdorfer;Alan G. Barbour;Stanley F. Hayes;Jorge L. Benach

  • The most infectious prion protein particles

    Jay R. Silveira;Gregory J. Raymond;Andrew G. Hughson;Richard E. Race

  • Secondary structure analysis of the scrapie-associated protein PrP 27-30 in water by infrared spectroscopy

    Byron W. Caughey;Aichun Dong;Kolari S. Bhat;Darwin Ernst

  • Biology of Borrelia species.

    A G Barbour;S F Hayes

  • Autophagy-mediated reentry of Francisella tularensis into the endocytic compartment after cytoplasmic replication

    Claire Checroun;Tara D. Wehrly;Elizabeth R. Fischer;Stanley F. Hayes

  • A Borrelia-specific monoclonal antibody binds to a flagellar epitope.

    A G Barbour;S F Hayes;R A Heiland;M E Schrumpf

  • Variation in a major surface protein of Lyme disease spirochetes.

    A G Barbour;S L Tessier;S F Hayes

  • Components and dynamics of fiber formation define a ubiquitous biogenesis pathway for bacterial pili

    Matthew Wolfgang;Matthew Wolfgang;Jos P.M. van Putten;Stanley F. Hayes;David Dorward

  • Isolation of a cultivable spirochete from Ixodes ricinus ticks of Switzerland

    Alan G. Barbour;Willy Burgdorfer;Stanley F. Hayes;Olivier Péter

  • Directional actin polymerization associated with spotted fever group Rickettsia infection of Vero cells.

    R A Heinzen;S F Hayes;M G Peacock;T Hackstadt

  • Invasion and Intracellular Development of the Human Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis Agent in Tick Cell Culture

    Ulrike G. Munderloh;Steven D. Jauron;Volker Fingerle;Lorenz Leitritz

  • Erythema chronicum migrans--a tickborne spirochetosis.

    Willy Burgdorfer;Alan G. Barbour;Stanley F. Hayes;Olivier Péter

  • Suppression of an absolute defect in Type IV pilus biogenesis by loss-of-function mutations in pilT, a twitching motility gene in Neisseria gonorrhoeae

    Matthew Wolfgang;Hae Sun Park;Stanley F. Hayes;Jos P.M. Van Putten

  • Neisseria gonorrhoeae PilV, a type IV pilus-associated protein essential to human epithelial cell adherence

    Hanne C. Winther-Larsen;Finn Terje Hegge;Matthew C Wolfgang;Stanley F. Hayes

  • Ixodes ricinus: vector of a hitherto undescribed spotted fever group agent in Switzerland.

    Burgdorfer W;Aeschlimann A;Peter O;Hayes Sf

  • Production of monoclonal antibodies reactive with a denatured form of the Friend murine leukemia virus gp70 envelope protein: use in a focal infectivity assay, immunohistochemical studies, electron microscopy and western blotting.

    Michael N. Robertson;Masaaki Miyazawa;Shiro Mori;Byron Caughey

  • Nucleoid Condensation in Escherichia coli That Express a Chlamydial Histone Homolog

    Clifton E. Barry;Stanley F. Hayes;Ted Hackstadt

  • Rickettsia bellii sp. nov.: a Tick-Borne Rickettsia, Widely Distributed in the United States, That Is Distinct from the Spotted Fever and Typhus Biogroups

    R. N. Philip;E. A. Casper;R. L. Anacker;J. Cory

  • The comP locus of Neisseria gonorrhoeae encodes a type IV prepilin that is dispensable for pilus biogenesis but essential for natural transformation.

    Matthew Wolfgang;Jos P. M. Van Putten;Stanley F. Hayes;Michael Koomey;Michael Koomey

  • Isolation of the equine granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent, Ehrlichia equi, in tick cell culture.

    U G Munderloh;J E Madigan;J S Dumler;J L Goodman

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan G. Barbour
Alan G. Barbour University of California, Irvine
Michael Koomey
Michael Koomey University of Oslo
Jos P. M. van Putten
Jos P. M. van Putten Utrecht University
Matthew C. Wolfgang
Matthew C. Wolfgang University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Byron Caughey
Byron Caughey National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Ted Hackstadt
Ted Hackstadt National Institutes of Health
David W. Dorward
David W. Dorward National Institutes of Health
Elizabeth R. Fischer
Elizabeth R. Fischer National Institutes of Health
Michael E. Konkel
Michael E. Konkel Washington State University
Robert S. Lane
Robert S. Lane University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in Biology and Biochemistry grows, students have a wide range of online degree options and flexible career pathways to consider. Programs such as a bs in biology online let you dive deep into the life sciences while balancing work or personal commitments.

Allied health professions also offer robust online pathways. For those starting in medical assistance, cma to lpn bridge programs online provide a streamlined route to further credentials, boosting employability in healthcare settings.

Nursing remains a popular and practical path. Students eager to make a direct impact on patient care can explore online asn programs, which pave the way for RN licensure and future specialization.

Nutrition is another rapidly growing field closely connected with biology and biochemistry. The best online nutrition programs open doors to roles in clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, and food science.

Ultimately, a strong background in biology or biochemistry serves as a launching pad for diverse, in-demand careers in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley F. Hayes

Recently Published Articles