World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
10171
World Ranking
3919
National Ranking
420

C. M. Bradshaw publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. M. Bradshaw sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 233 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

C. M. Bradshaw D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. M. Bradshaw sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

C. M. Bradshaw is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Neuroscience, with particular emphasis on Nutrition and Dietetics, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Food Science, and Sensory Systems.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics including Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques, Regulation of Appetite and Obesity, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods, Transgenic Plants and Applications, and Behavioral and Psychological Studies.

The most frequent publication venues for Bradshaw's research include Behavioural Processes, where most of their work appears, followed by contributions to arXiv (Cornell University), ESMO Open, Clinical Toxicology, and The Annals of Applied Statistics.

Notable recent papers by C. M. Bradshaw are:

  • Choice between different concentrations of sucrose in an adjusting-magnitude schedule: Evidence for reinforcer-specific value maxima (2020), Behavioural Processes
  • Further observations on the reinforcing value of sucrose solutions: Interaction between quantity and concentration (2023), Behavioural Processes
  • Theoretical note: Quantity and concentration as co-determinants of the reinforcing value of sucrose: A re-analysis of some previously published data (2024), Behavioural Processes
  • Adulteration of sucrose with citric acid: Effect on reinforcing value, examined using an adjusting-magnitude schedule of reinforcement (2021), Behavioural Processes
  • The effect of adulteration with a bitter tastant, denatonium benzoate, on the reinforcing value of sucrose (2022), Behavioural Processes

Frequent co-authors collaborating with C. M. Bradshaw include:

  • David M. Blei
  • E.P. Hamilton
  • Hee-Dong Han
  • Nour Abuhadra
  • K. Kalinsky

The research contributions by Bradshaw integrate experimental analysis of reinforcer value with biochemical and behavioral neuroscience methodologies, particularly investigating how variables such as concentration, quantity, and adulteration affect the reinforcing properties of sucrose.

Best Publications

  • Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement

    S. Mobini;S. Body;M.-Y. Ho;C. M. Bradshaw

  • Disconnection as a mechanism for cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.

    R. A. Dineen;J. Vilisaar;J. Hlinka;C. M. Bradshaw

  • Effects of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.

    S. Mobini;T.-J. Chiang;M.-Y. Ho;C.M. Bradshaw

  • Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of ”impulsive choice” behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology

    M.-Y. Ho;S. Mobini;T.-J. Chiang;C. M. Bradshaw

  • Effect of lesions of the ascending 5-hydroxytryptaminergic pathways on choice between delayed reinforcers

    Mary A. Wogar;C. M. Bradshaw;E. Szabadi

  • Quantification of Steady-State Operant Behavior

    Unknown

  • Behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

    C. M. Bradshaw;E. Szabadi;P. Bevan

  • Does modafinil activate the locus coeruleus in man? Comparison of modafinil and clonidine on arousal and autonomic functions in human volunteers

    R. H. Hou;C. Freeman;R. W. Langley;E. Szabadi

  • Effect of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on inter-temporal choice: a quantitative analysis.

    S. Mobini;T.-J. Chiang;A. S. A. Al-Ruwaitea;M.-Y. Ho

  • A theory of behaviour on progressive ratio schedules, with applications in behavioural pharmacology

    C. M. Bradshaw;P. R. Killeen

  • Time and behaviour : psychological and neurobehavioural analyses

    C. M. Bradshaw;E. Szabadi

  • THE PHARMACOLOGY OF ADRENERGIC NEURONAL RESPONSES IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX: EVIDENCE FOR EXCITATORY α‐ AND INHIBITORY β‐RECEPTORS

    P. Bevan;C.M. Bradshaw;E. Szabadi

  • Effects of orbital prefrontal cortex dopamine depletion on inter-temporal choice: a quantitative analysis.

    S. Kheramin;S. Body;M.-Y. Ho;D. N. Velázquez-Martinez

  • Effects of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the orbital prefrontal cortex on inter-temporal choice: a quantitative analysis.

    S. Kheramin;S. Body;S. Mobini;M.-Y. Ho

  • Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: II. Effect of the volume of sucrose reinforcement.

    C. M. Bradshaw;H. V. Ruddle;E. Szabadi

  • Comparison of the effects of clozapine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on performance on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule and on locomotor behaviour in the rat.

    S. Mobini;T.-J. Chiang;M.-Y. Ho;C. M. Bradshaw

  • Elongation of Pause-Time in Speech: A Simple, Objective Measure of Motor Retardation in Depression

    Unknown

  • The effect of acute tryptophan depletion on probabilistic choice.

    I. M. Anderson;R. A. Richell;C. M. Bradshaw

  • Comparison of the effects of clonidine and yohimbine on spontaneous pupillary fluctuations in healthy human volunteers.

    M A Phillips;E Szabadi;C M Bradshaw

  • Attenuation of the pupillary light reflex in anxious patients.

    A Bakes;CM Bradshaw;E Szabadi

  • Stroop performance in multiple sclerosis: information processing, selective attention, or executive functioning?

    J.A.B. Macniven;C. Davis;M.-Y. Ho;C.M. Bradshaw

  • 5-hydroxytryptamine and impulse control : prospects for a behavioural analysis

    M.-Y. Ho;S.S.A. Al-Zahrani;A.S.A. Al-Ruwaitea;C.M. Bradshaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Elemer Szabadi
Elemer Szabadi University of Nottingham
Panos Bitsios
Panos Bitsios University of Crete
Ian M. Anderson
Ian M. Anderson University of Manchester
John Francis William Deakin
John Francis William Deakin University of Manchester
Peter R. Killeen
Peter R. Killeen Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of flexible online degree programs and specialized career paths. Many students pursue online bachelor’s or master’s degrees in fields such as clinical psychology, counseling, or mental health. These programs often provide the coursework needed for licensure as a professional in evolving fields.

If you’re interested in working with couples and families, specialized training is required. To become a licensed expert, requirements can vary by location. For instance, regional guides can help you understand topics like how to become an mft in Port St. Lucie, how to become an mft in Portland, and how to become a marriage and family therapist in Raleigh. Each location has specific educational prerequisites, supervised experience hours, and licensing exams.

Career opportunities remain strong in cities nationwide, from the East Coast to the West. If you’re curious about the process elsewhere, explore steps for how to become an mft in Reno to see how requirements differ. Whichever route you choose, online psychology degrees form a flexible, accessible foundation for advancing in the field.

Best Scientists Citing C. M. Bradshaw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles