World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lisette Schoonhoven

Lisette Schoonhoven

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
71
Citations
19115
World Ranking
19982
National Ranking
727

Lisette Schoonhoven publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisette Schoonhoven sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 308 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lisette Schoonhoven D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisette Schoonhoven sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Nursing
  • Surgery

Her primary areas of investigation include Nursing, Intensive care medicine, Delirium, Surgery and Intensive care unit. Nursing is closely attributed to Family medicine in her research. Her work on Intensive care as part of general Intensive care medicine study is frequently linked to Disease severity, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.

Her Delirium research incorporates elements of Chi-squared distribution, Case-control study, Critically ill and Coma. Her Surgery research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Dermatology and Risk factor. Her work deals with themes such as Prospective cohort study, Randomized controlled trial and Hazard ratio, which intersect with Intensive care unit.

Her most cited work include:

  • Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: a systematic review. (404 citations)
  • Patient risk factors for pressure ulcer development: systematic review. (356 citations)
  • Patient risk factors for pressure ulcer development: systematic review. (356 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Nursing, Intensive care medicine, Psychological intervention, Delirium and Intensive care unit are her primary areas of study. Her work carried out in the field of Nursing brings together such families of science as Quality, Randomized controlled trial and Family medicine. The study incorporates disciplines such as Population ageing and Observational study in addition to Quality.

Her Psychological intervention research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Intervention and Medical emergency. Her studies deal with areas such as Intensive care, Critically ill and Icu patients as well as Delirium. The various areas that Lisette Schoonhoven examines in her Intensive care unit study include Rapid response system, Prospective cohort study and Vital signs.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Nursing (51.99%)
  • Intensive care medicine (23.24%)
  • Psychological intervention (24.16%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Nursing (51.99%)
  • Psychological intervention (24.16%)
  • CINAHL (16.21%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Lisette Schoonhoven focuses on Nursing, Psychological intervention, CINAHL, Quality and Family medicine. Her work in Nursing incorporates the disciplines of Focus group and Resilience. Her Psychological intervention research includes themes of Intervention, Mental health and Nursing care.

Her research in CINAHL intersects with topics in PsycINFO, Systematic review, Cochrane Library and Critical appraisal. Her studies in Quality integrate themes in fields like Social skills and Acute care. Her Emergency medicine study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Intensive care, Intensive care unit and Delirium.

Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Effect of Haloperidol on Survival Among Critically Ill Adults With a High Risk of Delirium: The REDUCE Randomized Clinical Trial. (118 citations)
  • Effect of Haloperidol on Survival Among Critically Ill Adults With a High Risk of Delirium: The REDUCE Randomized Clinical Trial. (118 citations)
  • Effect of Haloperidol on Survival Among Critically Ill Adults With a High Risk of Delirium: The REDUCE Randomized Clinical Trial. (118 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Nursing
  • Surgery

Her main research concerns Delirium, Intensive care unit, Physical therapy, Confidence interval and Intensive care medicine. Lisette Schoonhoven combines Delirium and Haloperidol in her research. Her Intensive care unit research includes elements of Hazard ratio, Prospective cohort study, Intensive care and Emergency medicine.

Her work on Prospective cohort study is being expanded to include thematically relevant topics such as Cochrane Library. Her work focuses on many connections between Emergency medicine and other disciplines, such as Incidence, that overlap with her field of interest in Systematic review. Lisette Schoonhoven is interested in Critically ill, which is a branch of Intensive care medicine.

Best Publications

  • Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: a systematic review.

    Claudia Gorecki;Julia M. Brown;E. Andrea Nelson;Michelle Briggs

  • Patient risk factors for pressure ulcer development: systematic review.

    Susanne Coleman;Claudia Gorecki;E. Andrea Nelson;S. José Closs

  • Nurses' intention to leave their profession: a cross sectional observational study in 10 European countries

    Maud M. Heinen;Theo van Achterberg;René Schwendimann;Britta Zander

  • Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: a systematic review.

    Tom H. Van De Belt;Lucien J.L.P.G. Engelen;Sivera A.A. Berben;Lisette Schoonhoven

  • Nurse forecasting in Europe (RN4CAST): Rationale, design and methodology

    Walter Sermeus;Linda H Aiken;Koen Van den Heede;Anne Marie Rafferty

  • Development and validation of PRE-DELIRIC (PREdiction of DELIRium in ICu patients) delirium prediction model for intensive care patients: observational multicentre study

    M van den Boogaard;P Pickkers;A J C Slooter;M A Kuiper

  • Improving Patient Handovers From Hospital to Primary Care: A Systematic Review

    Gijs Hesselink;Lisette Schoonhoven;Paul Barach;Anouk Spijker

  • Nurses' shift length and overtime working in 12 European countries: the association with perceived quality of care and patient safety.

    Peter Griffiths;Chiara Dall’Ora;Chiara Dall’Ora;Michael Simon;Jane Ball

  • A new pressure ulcer conceptual framework

    Susanne Coleman;Jane Nixon;Justin Keen;Lyn Wilson

  • Delirium in critically ill patients: impact on long-term health-related quality of life and cognitive functioning.

    Mark van den Boogaard;Lisette Schoonhoven;Andrea W.M. Evers;Johannes G. van der Hoeven

  • Incidence of pressure ulcers due to surgery

    Lisette Schoonhoven;Tom Defloor;Maria H F Grypdonck

  • A systematic review of hand hygiene improvement strategies: a behavioural approach

    Anita Huis;Theo van Achterberg;Marijn de Bruin;Richard Grol

  • Nursing implementation science: how evidence-based nursing requires evidence-based implementation.

    Theo van Achterberg;Lisette Schoonhoven;Richard Grol

  • Knowledge and Attitudes of Nurses on Pressure Ulcer Prevention: A Cross‐Sectional Multicenter Study in Belgian Hospitals

    Dimitri Beeckman;Tom Defloor;Lisette Schoonhoven;Katrien Vanderwee

  • Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers

    Lisette Schoonhoven;Jeen R E Haalboom;Mente T Bousema;Ale Algra

  • A systematic survey instrument translation process for multi-country, comparative health workforce studies

    Allison Squires;Linda H. Aiken;Koen van den Heede;Walter Sermeus

  • Prevention and treatment of incontinence‐associated dermatitis: literature review

    Dimitri Beeckman;Lisette Schoonhoven;Sofie Verhaeghe;Alexander Heyneman

  • Incidence and short-term consequences of delirium in critically ill patients: A prospective observational cohort study.

    Mark van den Boogaard;Lisette Schoonhoven;Johannes G. van der Hoeven;Theo van Achterberg

  • EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers: European reliability study

    Dimitri Beeckman;Lisette Schoonhoven;Jacqui Fletcher;Kátia Furtado

  • Effect of Haloperidol on Survival Among Critically Ill Adults With a High Risk of Delirium: The REDUCE Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Mark van den Boogaard;Arjen J. C. Slooter;Roger J. M. Brüggemann;Lisette Schoonhoven;Lisette Schoonhoven;Lisette Schoonhoven

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Pickkers
Peter Pickkers Radboud University
Richard Grol
Richard Grol Radboud University
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen Radboud University
Ruud J.G. Halfens
Ruud J.G. Halfens Maastricht University
Erik Buskens
Erik Buskens University Medical Center Groningen
Andrea W M Evers
Andrea W M Evers Leiden University
Carl May
Carl May London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Cor J. Kalkman
Cor J. Kalkman University Medical Center Utrecht
Linda H. Aiken
Linda H. Aiken University of Pennsylvania
Jan A.M. Smeitink
Jan A.M. Smeitink Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA doesn’t have to mean a single pathway. There are many related degrees and careers that can be pursued online, offering flexibility and affordability for working professionals and career changers.

For advanced nursing credentials, those seeking affordable options can research the cheapest dnp programs online to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. Aspiring pharmacists can also find flexible study options through pharmacy school online, which may suit those balancing work or family commitments.

Those interested in the administrative and data management side of health might consider a him bachelor's degree online, which opens doors to roles in medical data and compliance. Additionally, medical billing and coding remains in high demand and can be a practical entry point. Prospective students should compare medical billing and coding online courses cost to find a program that fits their budget and goals.

These online health programs allow students to train for rewarding healthcare careers, often at a lower cost and with a flexible schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Lisette Schoonhoven

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles