World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
41378
World Ranking
12934
National Ranking
1212

Julia Brown publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Brown sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 386 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Julia Brown D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Brown sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julia Brown is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with a significant number of publications in the subfields of Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Brown's work covers a range of topics including:

  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Global Health and Surgery
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Their recent notable papers include:

  • "Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial of eRAPID: eHealth Intervention During Chemotherapy" (2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology)
  • "Efficacy of Reduced-Intensity Chemotherapy With Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine on Quality of Life and Cancer Control Among Older and Frail Patients With Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer" (2021, JAMA Oncology)
  • "SPIRIT-PRO Extension explanation and elaboration: guidelines for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in protocols of clinical trials" (2021, BMJ Open)
  • "Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Therapy Guided by Measurable Residual Disease" (2023, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Reducing surgical site infections in low-income and middle-income countries (FALCON): a pragmatic, multicentre, stratified, randomised controlled trial" (2021, The Lancet)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Brown are:

  • Galina Velikova
  • David Jayne
  • Deena Harji
  • Niamh McKigney
  • Kate Absolom

Julia Brown has contributed extensively to publications in several venues, including:

  • Trials
  • British Journal of Surgery
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • European Journal of Surgical Oncology

In addition to journal articles, Brown has published a book titled "Background and Development of a Guide for Intersection Control Evaluation" in 2024, through Transportation Research Board eBooks.

Best Publications

  • Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial

    Pierre J Guillou;Philip Quirke;Helen Thorpe;Joanne Walker

  • High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma.

    J. Anthony Child;Gareth J. Morgan;Faith E. Davies;Roger G. Owen

  • Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

    David G. Jayne;Pierre J. Guillou;Helen Thorpe;Philip Quirke

  • Measuring Quality of Life in Routine Oncology Practice Improves Communication and Patient Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Galina Velikova;Laura Booth;Adam B. Smith;Paul M. Brown

  • Five‐year follow‐up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer

    D G Jayne;H C Thorpe;J Copeland;P Quirke

  • Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.

    David Jayne;Alessio Pigazzi;Helen Marshall;Julie Croft

  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial

    John P Greenwood;Neil Maredia;John F Younger;Julia M Brown

  • The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial B of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial.

    Bentzen Sm;Agrawal Rk;Aird Eg

  • The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial.

    Bentzen Sm;Agrawal Rk;Aird Eg

  • The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy.

    Ray Garry;Jayne Fountain;Su Mason;Jeremy Hawe

  • Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: a systematic review.

    Claudia Gorecki;Julia M. Brown;E. Andrea Nelson;Michelle Briggs

  • Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer

    B L Green;H C Marshall;F Collinson;P Quirke

  • Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO Extension.

    Melanie Calvert;Derek Kyte;Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber;Anita Slade

  • Patient risk factors for pressure ulcer development: systematic review.

    Susanne Coleman;Claudia Gorecki;E. Andrea Nelson;S. José Closs

  • Evidence-Based Guidelines for Determination of Sample Size and Interpretation of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30

    Kim Cocks;Madeleine T. King;Galina Velikova;Galina Velikova;Marrissa Martyn St-James

  • Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis.

    H. Jacob Bonjer;H. Jacob Bonjer;Wim C. J. Hop;Heidi Nelson;Daniel J. Sargent

  • Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial

    Lindsay Turnbull;Sarah Brown;Ian Harvey;Catherine Olivier

  • Adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BEATRICE): primary results of a randomised, phase 3 trial

    David Cameron;Julia Brown;Rebecca Dent;Christian Jackisch

  • Bladder and Sexual Function Following Resection for Rectal Cancer in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Technique

    D.G. Jayne;J.M. Brown;H. Thorpe;J. Walker

  • Lack of communication between healthcare professionals and women with ovarian cancer about sexual issues

    M L Stead;J M Brown;L Fallowfield;P Selby

Frequent Co-Authors

John P. Greenwood
John P. Greenwood University of Leeds
Bobby Samir Acharya
Bobby Samir Acharya King's College London
Sven Plein
Sven Plein University of Leeds
Susan A. Jebb
Susan A. Jebb University of Oxford
Walter M Gregory
Walter M Gregory University of Leeds
Tobias Golling
Tobias Golling University of Geneva
Peter Selby
Peter Selby University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare can significantly broaden your career options beyond traditional medical degrees. Online learning now makes it easier and more affordable to gain specialized qualifications in the medical field. For example, if you are aiming for advanced practice nursing, you can discover some of the cheapest DNP programs online that offer flexibility and cost savings, enabling you to balance work, study, and personal commitments.

Pharmacy is another thriving area within healthcare. If becoming a pharmacist interests you, consider enrolling in the cheapest online pharmacy school programs that can help minimize student debt while opening doors to rewarding pharmacy careers.

For those drawn to healthcare technology and data, accredited HIM programs teach you how to manage patient information systems—a vital role in modern healthcare organizations.

Finally, if you’re seeking a fast entry to the job market, exploring medical billing and coding may be right for you. Learning about medical coding certification cost demonstrates how to launch your career in this essential and growing field without breaking the bank.

Best Scientists Citing Julia Brown

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles