World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
118
Citations
56360
World Ranking
4035
National Ranking
393

Peter Selby publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Selby sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 812 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Selby D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Selby sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Selby is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their primary research focus lies within the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Their research topics cover a considerable range including:

  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Peter Selby has published extensively, with key papers in prominent journals. Recent significant publications include:

  • Challenges of early renal cancer detection: symptom patterns and incidental diagnosis rate in a multicentre prospective UK cohort of patients presenting with suspected renal cancer, 2020, BMJ Open
  • European Groundshot-addressing Europe's cancer research challenges: a Lancet Oncology Commission, 2022, The Lancet Oncology
  • Temporary treatment cessation versus continuation of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (STAR): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial, 2023, The Lancet Oncology
  • APOBEC3B-mediated corruption of the tumor cell immunopeptidome induces heteroclitic neoepitopes for cancer immunotherapy, 2020, Nature Communications
  • ECCO Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care: Prostate cancer, 2020, Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology

Frequent collaborators in their work include David Nelson, Ros Kane, Samuel Cooke, Mark Lawler, and Naveen Vasudev.

Their publications appear most commonly in venues such as:

  • Journal of Cancer Policy
  • Endocrine Abstracts
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal
  • BMJ Open
  • The Lancet Oncology

Best Publications

  • High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma.

    J. Anthony Child;Gareth J. Morgan;Faith E. Davies;Roger G. Owen

  • Measuring Quality of Life in Routine Oncology Practice Improves Communication and Patient Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Galina Velikova;Laura Booth;Adam B. Smith;Paul M. Brown

  • Neonatal abstinence syndrome after methadone or buprenorphine exposure

    Hendrée E. Jones;Karol Kaltenbach;Sarah H. Heil;Susan M. Stine

  • The prevalence and outcomes of frailty in older cancer patients: a systematic review

    C. Handforth;A. Clegg;C. Young;S. Simpkins

  • Detection of melanoma cells in peripheral blood by means of reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reaction.

    B. Smith;P. Selby;J. Southgate;K. Pittman

  • Release of the angiogenic cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from platelets: significance for VEGF measurements and cancer biology.

    R. E. Banks;M. A. Forbes;S. E. Kinsey;A. Stanley

  • Anxiety disorders in cancer patients: Their nature, associations, and relation to quality of life

    D. Stark;M. Kiely;A. Smith;G. Velikova

  • Proteomics: new perspectives, new biomedical opportunities

    Rosamonde E Banks;Michael J Dunn;Denis F Hochstrasser;Jean-Charles Sanchez

  • Hypertension Canada’s 2018 Guidelines for Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults and Children

    Kara A. Nerenberg;Kelly B. Zarnke;Alexander A. Leung;Kaberi Dasgupta

  • The 2015 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension.

    Kaberi Dasgupta;Robert R. Quinn;Kelly B. Zarnke;Doreen M. Rabi

  • Screening for anxiety and depression in cancer patients: the effects of disease and treatment

    T Ibbotson;Peter Maguire;P Selby;T Priestman

  • Hypertension Canada's 2020 Comprehensive Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults and Children.

    Doreen M. Rabi;Kerry A. McBrien;Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze;Meranda Nakhla

  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in Breast Cancer: Comparison of Plasma, Serum, and Tissue VEGF and Microvessel Density and Effects of Tamoxifen

    Jacqueline Adams;Pauline J. Carder;Sarah Downey;Mary A. Forbes

  • Cyclosporin A to prevent graft-versus-host disease in man after allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation.

    R.L. Powles;H.M. Clink;D. Spence;G. Morgenstern

  • A critical appraisal of the "human tumor stem-cell assay".

    Peter Selby;Ronald N. Buick;Ian Tannock

  • Detection of epithelial cancer cells in peripheral blood by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.

    SA Burchill;MF Bradbury;K Pittman;J Southgate

  • Interferon-alpha and survival in metastatic renal carcinoma: early results of a randomised controlled trial

    A Ritchie;G Griffiths;M Parmar;SD Fossa

  • Prognostic significance of BCL-2 expression and bcl-2 major breakpoint region rearrangement in diffuse large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a British National Lymphoma Investigation Study.

    ME Hill;KA MacLennan;DC Cunningham;B Vaughan Hudson

  • Lack of communication between healthcare professionals and women with ovarian cancer about sexual issues

    M L Stead;J M Brown;L Fallowfield;P Selby

  • Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension

    Alexander A. Leung;Kara Nerenberg;Stella S. Daskalopoulou;Kerry McBrien

Frequent Co-Authors

Rosamonde E. Banks
Rosamonde E. Banks University of Leeds
Alan Melcher
Alan Melcher Institute of Cancer Research
Richard G. Vile
Richard G. Vile Mayo Clinic
Kevin J. Harrington
Kevin J. Harrington Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Timothy Kottke
Timothy Kottke Mayo Clinic
Jennifer Southgate
Jennifer Southgate University of York
Matthew C. Coffey
Matthew C. Coffey Oncolytics Biotech (Canada)
Julia Brown
Julia Brown University of Leeds
Peter Johnson
Peter Johnson University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying medicine in the USA can open doors to many rewarding healthcare careers, even for those exploring alternative paths to becoming a healthcare professional. For individuals without a nursing background, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online offer a streamlined pathway to advanced nursing roles. These programs allow you to earn a master’s degree in nursing without prior RN credentials.

If you're seeking a more accessible entry point into nursing, online adn programs for non nurses are a popular choice. They typically take less time and can be a stepping stone to higher nursing degrees.

For those interested in healthcare administration, exploring financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes can help you launch a new career in medical billing or coding with the support of scholarships or grants.

Additionally, if testing is a concern, some institutions feature a nursing school without teas test requirement, making the application process less stressful and more approachable.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Selby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles