World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17335 16288 261 249 460 52669

Sabina De Geest publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sabina De Geest between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sabina De Geest published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 16.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2022. 28 of the 554 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2022. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 25 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 30 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 27 publications 2026: 1 publication
1994 2026

554 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sabina De Geest: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 3
1996 2
1997 2
1998 6
1999 13
2000 11
2001 12
2002 12
2003 12
2004 25
2005 23
2006 30
2007 16
2008 16
2009 17
2010 24
2011 19
2012 22
2013 27
2014 15
2015 22
2016 18
2017 19
2018 26
2019 18
2020 12
2021 22
2022 35
2023 24
2024 22
2025 27
2026 1
Total 554
Download as CSV

Sabina De Geest publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sabina De Geest sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 460 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 460
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Sabina De Geest D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sabina De Geest sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sabina De Geest is affiliated with the University of Basel in Switzerland and has an extensive publication record primarily within the fields of medicine and health professions. Their research work spans various subfields including general health professions, transplantation, epidemiology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and family practice.

The primary topics covered in Sabina De Geest's research include:

  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes

De Geest has contributed to multiple scholarly articles, among which the following recent papers stand out:

  • Core components and impact of nurse-led integrated care models for home-dwelling older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, International Journal of Nursing Studies
  • Clinicians and patients perspectives on follow-up care and eHealth support after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A mixed-methods contextual analysis as part of the SMILe study, 2020, European Journal of Oncology Nursing
  • Powering Swiss health care for the future: implementation science to bridge "the valley of death", 2020, Swiss Medical Weekly
  • Unraveling implementation context: the Basel Approach for coNtextual ANAlysis (BANANA) in implementation science and its application in the SMILe project, 2022, Implementation Science Communications
  • Positive effect of the INTERCARE nurse-led model on reducing nursing home transfers: A nonrandomized stepped-wedge design, 2022, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

De Geest frequently collaborates with a set of co-authors, including:

  • Oriol Manuel
  • Kris Denhaerynck
  • Fabienne Dobbels
  • Juliane Mielke
  • Sonja Beckmann

Publications by De Geest often appear in journals with significant activity from them, including:

  • Journal of Nursing Scholarship
  • Transplant International
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

In addition to journal articles, De Geest has contributed to book publications, such as a forthcoming title titled Medications for Older Persons, to be published by Elsevier BV in 2025.

Best Publications

  • 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

    Giuseppe Mancia;Robert Fagard;Krzysztof Narkiewicz;Josep Redon

  • Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action:

    Sabina De Geest;Eduardo Sabaté

  • A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications

    Bernard Vrijens;Sabina De Geest;Sabina De Geest;Dyfrig A. Hughes;Kardas Przemyslaw

  • Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: a review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches.

    Philip Moons;Werner Budts;Sabina De Geest;Sabina De Geest

  • Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of nonadherence to imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: the ADAGIO study

    Lucien Noens;Marie Anne Van Lierde;Robrecht De Bock;Gregor Verhoef

  • Prevalence, patterns and predictors of nursing care left undone in European hospitals: results from the multicountry cross-sectional RN4CAST study

    Dietmar Ausserhofer;Britta Zander;Reinhard Busse;Maria Schubert

  • Prevalence and Consequences of Nonadherence to Hemodialysis Regimens

    Kris Denhaerynck;Dominique Manhaeve;Fabienne Dobbels;Daniela Garzoni

  • A nurse-led interdisciplinary intervention program for delirium in elderly hip-fracture patients.

    Koen Milisen;Marquis D. Foreman;Ivo L. Abraham;Sabina De Geest

  • Prevalence, consequences, and determinants of nonadherence in adult renal transplant patients: a literature review.

    Kris Denhaerynck;Fabienne Dobbels;Irina Cleemput;Ariane Desmyttere

  • Rationing of nursing care and its relationship to patient outcomes: the Swiss extension of the International Hospital Outcomes Study

    Maria Schubert;Tracy R. Glass;Sean P. Clarke;Linda H. Aiken

  • Incidence, determinants, and consequences of subclinical noncompliance with immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients.

    Sabina De Geest;Liesbeth Borgermans;Hilde Gemoets;Ivo Abraham;Ivo Abraham

  • Growing pains: Non‐adherence with the immunosuppressive regimen in adolescent transplant recipients

    Fabienne Dobbels;Rita Van Damme-Lombaert;Johan Vanhaecke;Sabina De Geest;Sabina De Geest

  • Identification and Assessment of Adherence-Enhancing Interventions in Studies Assessing Medication Adherence Through Electronically Compiled Drug Dosing Histories: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

    Jenny Demonceau;Todd Ruppar;Todd Ruppar;Paulus Kristanto;Dyfrig A. Hughes

  • Practical Recommendations for Long-term Management of Modifiable Risks in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: A Guidance Report and Clinical Checklist by the Consensus on Managing Modifiable Risk in Transplantation (COMMIT) Group.

    James M. Neuberger;Wolf O. Bechstein;Dirk R.J. Kuypers;Patrizia Burra

  • Validation of the Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care instrument.

    Maria Schubert;Tracy R. Glass;Sean P. Clarke;Bianca Schaffert-Witvliet

  • ESPACOMP Medication Adherence Reporting Guideline (EMERGE).

    Sabina De Geest;Leah L Zullig;Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob;Remon Helmy

  • Pretransplant predictors of posttransplant adherence and clinical outcome: an evidence base for pretransplant psychosocial screening.

    Fabienne Dobbels;Johan Vanhaecke;Lieven Dupont;Frederik Nevens

  • Falls and consequent injuries in hospitalized patients: effects of an interdisciplinary falls prevention program

    René Schwendimann;Hugo Bühler;Sabina De Geest;Sabina De Geest;Koen Milisen

  • The association of patient safety climate and nurse-related organizational factors with selected patient outcomes: a cross-sectional survey.

    Dietmar Ausserhofer;Maria Schubert;Mario Desmedt;Mary A. Blegen

  • Interventions to improve medication‐adherence after transplantation: a systematic review

    Leentje De Bleser;Michelle Matteson;Fabienne Dobbels;Cynthia Russell

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Gewillig
Marc Gewillig KU Leuven
Heiner C. Bucher
Heiner C. Bucher University Hospital of Basel
Anne-Mieke Vandamme
Anne-Mieke Vandamme Rega Institute for Medical Research
Tiny Jaarsma
Tiny Jaarsma Linköping University
Lieven Dupont
Lieven Dupont KU Leuven
Anna Wirz-Justice
Anna Wirz-Justice University of Basel
Stephanie J. Lee
Stephanie J. Lee Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA doesn’t always start or end with the traditional path of an MD. Many students consider online programs in nursing and allied health, given their flexibility and affordability. If you’re seeking advanced practice roles, you might compare the cheapest online msn programs to maximize your investment and reduce your loan burden.

Ambitious nurses aiming to reach the highest levels of practice and research can benefit from a phd in nursing. This degree opens doors to academic, leadership, and policy-making positions. For RNs seeking to advance, understanding the average cost of rn to bsn programs is crucial to ensure affordability without sacrificing program quality.

For those without a nursing background, online opportunities exist as well. Direct entry np programs for non nurses online offer a streamlined route into advanced nursing, helping career changers step into healthcare leadership quickly. Exploring these diverse degree options can open up multiple rewarding pathways in the US medical and healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Sabina De Geest

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles