World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 35 6566 6106 3173 2897 89 14810

Laura Campbell-Sills publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laura Campbell-Sills between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laura Campbell-Sills published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2017. 5 of the 92 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2017. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
2004 2025

92 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laura Campbell-Sills: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 2
2006 5
2007 2
2008 1
2009 5
2010 2
2011 5
2012 4
2013 6
2014 5
2015 3
2016 2
2017 9
2018 5
2019 7
2020 7
2021 8
2022 2
2023 6
2024 2
2025 3
Total 92
Download as CSV

Laura Campbell-Sills publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura Campbell-Sills sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 84–93 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 89 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301 89
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Laura Campbell-Sills D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura Campbell-Sills sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243 35
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Laura Campbell-Sills is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily spans across psychology and medicine, with a strong focus on clinical psychology and related subfields such as epidemiology, emergency medicine, experimental and cognitive psychology, and neurology.

The core topics in their research include suicide and self-harm studies, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) research, resilience and mental health, and traumatic brain injury research. Additional notable areas of study cover cardiac arrest and resuscitation, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, along with anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Campbell-Sills has contributed to a number of peer-reviewed publications including:

  • Satisfaction with Life after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study (2020, Journal of Neurotrauma)
  • Dissecting the heterogeneity of posttraumatic stress disorder: differences in polygenic risk, stress exposures, and course of PTSD subtypes (2021, Psychological Medicine)
  • Unit cohesion during deployment and post-deployment mental health: is cohesion an individual- or unit-level buffer for combat-exposed soldiers? (2020, Psychological Medicine)
  • Invariance of the Bifactor Structure of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) Symptoms on the Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire Across Time, Demographic Characteristics, and Clinical Groups: A TRACK-TBI Study (2020, Assessment)
  • Change in neural response during emotion regulation is associated with symptom reduction in cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders (2020, Journal of Affective Disorders)

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Campbell-Sills include Murray B. Stein, Robert J. Ursano, Sonia Jain, Ronald C. Kessler, and Xiaoying Sun. These collaborations are reflected in numerous jointly authored studies contributing to the understanding of mental health and related medical fields.

Campbell-Sills's research is commonly published in venues such as Psychological Medicine, JAMA Network Open, Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of Neurotrauma, and Assessment. The largest number of contributions appear in Psychological Medicine and JAMA Network Open, indicative of a focus on psychiatry and broad medical research.

Best Publications

  • Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience.

    Laura Campbell-Sills;Murray B. Stein

  • Relationship of resilience to personality, coping, and psychiatric symptoms in young adults.

    Laura Campbell-Sills;Sharon L. Cohan;Sharon L. Cohan;Murray B. Stein;Murray B. Stein;Murray B. Stein

  • Effects of suppression and acceptance on emotional responses of individuals with anxiety and mood disorders.

    Laura Campbell-Sills;David H. Barlow;Timothy A. Brown;Stefan G. Hofmann

  • Acceptability and suppression of negative emotion in anxiety and mood disorders.

    Laura Campbell-Sills;David H. Barlow;Timothy A. Brown;Stefan G. Hofmann

  • Incorporating Emotion Regulation into Conceptualizations and Treatments of Anxiety and Mood Disorders.

    Laura Campbell-Sills;David H. Barlow

  • Demographic and childhood environmental predictors of resilience in a community sample.

    Laura Campbell-Sills;David R. Forde;Murray B. Stein

  • Delivery of evidence-based treatment for multiple anxiety disorders in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.

    Peter Roy-Byrne;Michelle G. Craske;Greer Sullivan;Raphael D. Rose

  • Validation of a Brief Measure of Anxiety-Related Severity and Impairment: The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS)

    Laura Campbell-Sills;Sonya B. Norman;Sonya B. Norman;Michelle G. Craske;Greer Greer Sullivan;Greer Greer Sullivan

  • Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation scales in a large sample of outpatients with anxiety and mood disorders.

    Laura Campbell-Sills;Gabrielle I. Liverant;Timothy A. Brown

  • Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depression in Civilian Patients After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study

    Murray B. Stein;Murray B. Stein;Sonia Jain;Joseph T. Giacino;Joseph T. Giacino;Harvey Levin

  • Prefrontal dysfunction during emotion regulation in generalized anxiety and panic disorders.

    T. Manber Ball;H. J. Ramsawh;L. Campbell-Sills;M. P. Paulus

  • Computer-assisted delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders in primary-care settings.

    Michelle G. Craske;Raphael D. Rose;M.P.H Ariel Lang Ph.D.;Stacy Shaw Welch

  • Amygdala response and functional connectivity during emotion regulation: a study of 14 depressed adolescents.

    Greg Perlman;Alan N. Simmons;Alan N. Simmons;Jing Wu;Kevin S. Hahn

  • Prospective Longitudinal Evaluation of the Effect of Deployment-Acquired Traumatic Brain Injury on Posttraumatic Stress and Related Disorders: Results From the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS)

    Murray B. Stein;Ronald C. Kessler;Steven G. Heeringa;Sonia Jain

  • Functioning of neural systems supporting emotion regulation in anxiety-prone individuals

    Laura Campbell-Sills;Alan N. Simmons;Alan N. Simmons;Kathryn L. Lovero;Alexis A. Rochlin

  • Disorder-specific Impact of Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management Treatment for Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care

    Michelle G. Craske;Murray Stein;J. Greer Sullivan;Cathy D. Sherbourne

  • Genetic variation in 5HTTLPR is associated with emotional resilience.

    Murray B. Stein;Laura Campbell-Sills;Joel Gelernter

  • The distinctiveness of compulsive hoarding from obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Jessica R. Grisham;Timothy A. Brown;Gabrielle I. Liverant;Laura Campbell-Sills

  • Psychometrics of a Brief Measure of Anxiety to Detect Severity and Impairment: The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS)

    Sonya B. Norman;Laura Campbell-Sills;Carla A. Hitchcock;Carla A. Hitchcock;Sarah Sullivan

  • Single-Subject Anxiety Treatment Outcome Prediction using Functional Neuroimaging

    Tali M Ball;Murray B Stein;Holly J Ramsawh;Laura Campbell-Sills

  • Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in a Large Sample of Anxiety Patients

    Alexander Bystritsky;Sarit Hovav;Cathy Sherbourne;Murray B. Stein

Frequent Co-Authors

Murray B. Stein
Murray B. Stein University of California, San Diego
Ronald C. Kessler
Ronald C. Kessler Harvard University
Robert J. Ursano
Robert J. Ursano Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Peter Roy-Byrne
Peter Roy-Byrne University of Washington
Matthew K. Nock
Matthew K. Nock Harvard University
Michelle G. Craske
Michelle G. Craske University of California, Los Angeles
Steven G. Heeringa
Steven G. Heeringa University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ariel J. Lang
Ariel J. Lang University of California, San Diego
Cathy D. Sherbourne
Cathy D. Sherbourne RAND Corporation
Denise A. Chavira
Denise A. Chavira University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can open a wide array of career pathways. Many students choose programs that blend affordability, flexibility, and strong career outcomes. For those interested in social work, there are cheapest msw programs online that provide quality education without the high price tag, making advanced degrees more accessible than ever.

If you’re passionate about behavior analysis, bcba programs offer a highly specialized credential with strong job prospects, and many universities now feature completely online, affordable options. For students who want to advance their career quickly, the fastest msw program can help you earn your degree in a shorter time frame.

Psychology is another popular choice, and it’s now possible to find a accelerated psychology degree online that helps you enter the field rapidly. These programs combine online flexibility with intensive coursework, making them ideal for motivated students.

Best Scientists Citing Laura Campbell-Sills

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles