World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
9588
World Ranking
8107
National Ranking
4347

Suzanne H. Mitchell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suzanne H. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 197 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Suzanne H. Mitchell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suzanne H. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Suzanne H. Mitchell is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Psychology, with notable contributions across several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work often addresses themes related to decision-making processes, behavioral economics, and psychological factors influencing behavior. Main topics they explore include:

  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health

Mitchell has published in a variety of scientific journals and venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Behavioural Processes
  • BMC Palliative Care

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Mitchell include:

  • "Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture," 2023, BMC Palliative Care
  • "Moderate Stability among Delay, Probability, and Effort Discounting in Humans," 2023, The Psychological Record
  • "Effort-Related Decision-Making in ADHD," 2020, Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Science
  • "Environmental enrichment promotes adaptive responding during tests of behavioral regulation in male heterogeneous stock rats," 2024, Scientific Reports
  • "Genome-wide association study of delay discounting in Heterogeneous Stock rats," 2024, Genes Brain & Behavior

Frequent collaborators in Mitchell's research include Abraham A. Palmer, Connor D. Martin, Anthony M. George, Apurva S. Chitre, and Oksana Polesskaya. These coauthors have contributed to multiple publications alongside Mitchell, reflecting collaborative work across related research topics.

Best Publications

  • Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers

    Suzanne H. Mitchell

  • DELAY OR PROBABILITY DISCOUNTING IN A MODEL OF IMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR: EFFECT OF ALCOHOL

    Jerry B. Richards;Lan Zhang;Suzanne H. Mitchell;Harriet de Wit

  • Understanding the construct of impulsivity and its relationship to alcohol use disorders.

    Danielle M. Dick;Gregory Smith;Peter Olausson;Suzanne H. Mitchell

  • Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure.

    J B Richards;S H Mitchell;H de Wit;L S Seiden

  • Neuropsychological function and delay discounting in methamphetamine-dependent individuals.

    William F. Hoffman;William F. Hoffman;Meredith Moore;Raymond Templin;Bentson McFarland;Bentson McFarland

  • Behavioral and Biological Indicators of Impulsivity in the Development of Alcohol Use, Problems, and Disorders

    C. W. Lejuez;Jessica F. Magidson;Suzanne H. Mitchell;Ranjana Sinha

  • Choice impulsivity: Definitions, measurement issues, and clinical implications

    Kristen R. Hamilton;Marci R. Mitchell;Victoria C. Wing;Iris M. Balodis

  • Large-scale topology and the default mode network in the mouse connectome

    James M. Stafford;Benjamin R. Jarrett;Oscar Miranda-Dominguez;Brian D. Mills

  • Cortical activation during delay discounting in abstinent methamphetamine dependent individuals

    William F. Hoffman;William F. Hoffman;Daniel L. Schwartz;Daniel L. Schwartz;Marilyn S. Huckans;Marilyn S. Huckans;Bentson H. McFarland;Bentson H. McFarland

  • Effects of short-term nicotine deprivation on decision-making: delay, uncertainty and effort discounting.

    Suzanne H. Mitchell

  • Global and local morphometric differences in recently abstinent methamphetamine-dependent individuals.

    Daniel L. Schwartz;Alex D. Mitchell;David L. Lahna;David L. Lahna;Hannah S. Luber;Hannah S. Luber

  • Measuring Impulsivity and Modeling Its Association With Cigarette Smoking

    Suzanne H. Mitchell

  • Delay discounting and substance abuse-dependence.

    Richard Yi;Suzanne H. Mitchell;Warren K. Bickel

  • Reward circuit connectivity relates to delay discounting in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Taciana G. Costa Dias;Vanessa B. Wilson;Deepti R. Bathula;Swathi P. Iyer

  • Delay discounting of reward in ADHD: application in young children

    Vanessa B. Wilson;Suzanne H. Mitchell;Erica D. Musser;Erica D. Musser;Colleen F. Schmitt

  • Delay discounting behavior and white matter microstructure abnormalities in youth with a family history of alcoholism.

    Megan M. Herting;Daniel Schwartz;Suzanne H. Mitchell;Bonnie J. Nagel

  • Relation between Time Perspective and Delay Discounting: A Literature Review.

    Ursina Teuscher;Suzanne H. Mitchell

  • Rats bred for high alcohol drinking are more sensitive to delayed and probabilistic outcomes

    Clare J. Wilhelm;Suzanne H. Mitchell

  • The subjective value of delayed and probabilistic outcomes: Outcome size matters for gains but not for losses

    Suzanne H. Mitchell;Vanessa B. Wilson

  • Characterizing heterogeneity in children with and without ADHD based on reward system connectivity

    Taciana G. Costa Dias;Taciana G. Costa Dias;Swathi P. Iyer;Samuel D. Carpenter;Robert P. Cary

  • Risk, Reward, and Economic Decision Making in Aging

    David R. Roalf;David R. Roalf;Suzanne H. Mitchell;William T. Harbaugh;Jeri S. Janowsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Harriet de Wit
Harriet de Wit University of Chicago
Tamara J. Phillips
Tamara J. Phillips Oregon Health & Science University
Joel T. Nigg
Joel T. Nigg Oregon Health & Science University
Damien A. Fair
Damien A. Fair University of Minnesota
Carl W. Lejuez
Carl W. Lejuez Stony Brook University
Richard Yi
Richard Yi University of Kansas
Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri
Warren K. Bickel
Warren K. Bickel Virginia Tech
Bonnie J. Nagel
Bonnie J. Nagel Oregon Health & Science University
Charles W. Mathias
Charles W. Mathias The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers. Many students consider becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role that combines counseling skills with family dynamics expertise. With the rise of online degrees, it’s more accessible than ever to begin this journey, but requirements can vary significantly based on location.

For example, those interested in practicing in Tulsa should review the mft requirements in Tulsa to understand local licensing and educational prerequisites. Similarly, aspiring therapists in Virginia should check the Virginia Beach mft certification requirements for specific state mandates.

If you are considering starting your MFT career in the nation’s capital, take a look at how to become an mft in Washington DC. Requirements may also differ in the Midwest, so review how to become a marriage and family therapist in Wichita for more information.

Whether you choose an online or traditional pathway, researching state-specific requirements is essential. Doing so will help you align your degree and training with your career goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Suzanne H. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles