World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
23875
World Ranking
17516
National Ranking
8765

Katherine L. Kahn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine L. Kahn sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 349 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Katherine L. Kahn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine L. Kahn sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Katherine L. Kahn is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a total of 42 publications contributing to this area.

The subfields in which Katherine L. Kahn has concentrated their work include:

  • Oncology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • General Health Professions
  • Sociology and Political Science

The main topics addressed by their research cover:

  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Katherine L. Kahn include:

  • "Trends in US Ambulatory Care Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2019-2021" (2022), published in JAMA
  • "Practical publication metrics for academics" (2021), published in Clinical and Translational Science
  • "Taking Care of Yourself and Your Risk for Breast Cancer (CUIDARSE): A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Health Communication Intervention for Latinas" (2020), published in Health Education & Behavior
  • "Engaging Latino Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Cancer Survivors in Their Care: Piloting a Photonovela Intervention" (2020), published in Journal of Cancer Education
  • "Oncologists' perceptions of the usefulness of cancer survivorship care plan components" (2020), published in Supportive Care in Cancer

Katherine L. Kahn frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • John N. Mafi
  • Sitaram Vangala
  • Melody Craff
  • Cheryl L. Damberg
  • Dale Skinner

Their work has appeared across various publication venues, highlighting their research presence in:

  • UNC Libraries
  • JAMA
  • Clinical and Translational Science
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Health Affairs

Best Publications

  • Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures.

    Mark R. Chassin;Jacqueline Kosecoff;Rolla Edward Park;Constance M. Winslow

  • Epidemiology of Sepsis Syndrome in 8 Academic Medical Centers

    Kenneth E. Sands;David W. Bates;Paul N. Lanken;Paul S. Graman

  • Variations in the Use of Medical and Surgical Services by the Medicare Population

    Mark R. Chassin;Robert H. Brook;Rolla Edward Park;Joan Keesey

  • Arm Edema in Breast Cancer Patients

    Virginia S. Erickson;Marjorie L. Pearson;Patricia A. Ganz;John Adams

  • Hospital characteristics and quality of care.

    Emmett B. Keeler;Lisa V. Rubenstein;Katherine L. Kahn;David Draper

  • Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures.

    Rolla Edward Park;Arlene Fink;Robert H. Brook;Mark R. Chassin

  • Objective burden, resources, and other stressors among informal cancer caregivers: A hidden quality issue?

    Michelle van Ryn;Sara Sanders;Katherine L. Kahn;Courtney van Houtven

  • Preoperative prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in esophageal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review

    Gareth S. Dulai;Sushovan Guha;Katherine L. Kahn;Jeffrey Gornbein

  • Health care for black and poor hospitalized Medicare patients.

    Katherine L. Kahn;Marjorie L. Pearson;Ellen R. Harrison;Katherine A. Desmond

  • Comparing outcomes of care before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system.

    Katherine L. Kahn;Emmett B. Keeler;Marjorie J. Sherwood;William H. Rogers

  • Physician factors associated with discussions about end‐of‐life care

    Nancy L. Keating;Mary Beth Landrum;Selwyn O. Rogers;Susan K. Baum

  • Family Perspectives on Aggressive Cancer Care Near the End of Life.

    Alexi A. Wright;Nancy L. Keating;John Z. Ayanian;Elizabeth A. Chrischilles

  • Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The 'quicker-and-sicker' story revisited.

    Jacqueline Kosecoff;Katherine L. Kahn;William H. Rogers;Ellen J. Reinisch

  • Explaining Variations in Hospital Death Rates: Randomness, Severity of Illness, Quality of Care

    Rolla Edward Park;Robert H. Brook;Jacqueline Kosecoff;Joan Keesey

  • Measuring Quality of Care With Explicit Process Criteria Before and After Implementation of the DRG-Based Prospective Payment System

    Katherine L. Kahn;William H. Rogers;Lisa V. Rubenstein;Marjorie J. Sherwood

  • What is the concordance between the medical record and patient self-report as data sources for ambulatory care?

    Diana M. Tisnado;John L. Adams;Honghu Liu;Cheryl L. Damberg

  • Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: How Can We Improve the Quality of Cancer Care in the United States?

    Jennifer L. Malin;Eric C. Schneider;Arnold M. Epstein;John Adams

  • Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis.

    M R DiMatteo;S C Morton;H S Lepper;T M Damush

  • Quality of care before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. A summary of effects.

    William H. Rogers;David Draper;Katherine L. Kahn;Emmett B. Keeler

  • Objective Burden, Resources, and Other Stressors Among Informal Cancer Caregivers

    Michelle van Ryn;Sara Sanders;Katherine L. Kahn;Courtney van Houtven

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert H. Brook
Robert H. Brook RAND Corporation
Patricia A. Ganz
Patricia A. Ganz University of California, Los Angeles
Nancy L. Keating
Nancy L. Keating Harvard University
Emmett B. Keeler
Emmett B. Keeler RAND Corporation
William H. Rogers
William H. Rogers Tufts Medical Center
Honghu Liu
Honghu Liu University of California, Los Angeles
Clifford Y. Ko
Clifford Y. Ko University of California, Los Angeles
Neil S. Wenger
Neil S. Wenger University of California, Los Angeles
Jane C. Weeks
Jane C. Weeks Harvard University
John Z. Ayanian
John Z. Ayanian University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine in the USA offers a diverse range of educational options and career paths beyond the MD. Many students consider online healthcare administration degree programs as a practical alternative or complement to clinical practice. These degrees equip graduates with essential management and leadership skills needed in modern healthcare settings.

For nurses seeking career advancement, adn to np bridge programs provide a streamlined pathway from an Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN) to a Nurse Practitioner (NP) role. These programs are designed for working professionals and allow for greater flexibility through online study.

Nutrition is another vital field, and an online bachelor’s in nutrition can open doors to careers in dietetics, wellness coaching, or public health. Such online degrees cater to students balancing education with other responsibilities.

When exploring healthcare management, accreditation is crucial. Prospective students should research which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? to ensure program credibility and career readiness.

Whether your interests lie in clinical practice, health management, or wellness, a flexible online degree can be a valuable step toward your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Katherine L. Kahn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles