World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emmett B. Keeler

Emmett B. Keeler

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 15967 15020 8035 7433 307 29111

Emmett B. Keeler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emmett B. Keeler between 1969 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emmett B. Keeler published across 53 years, from 1969 to 2021, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2006. 4 of the 331 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2006. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 2 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 2 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 11 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 16 publications 1991: 22 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications
1969 2021

331 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emmett B. Keeler: publications per year, 1969 to 2021
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 2
1971 1
1972 2
1973 1
1974 2
1975 4
1976 2
1977 11
1978 3
1979 0
1980 3
1981 4
1982 5
1983 5
1984 3
1985 6
1986 5
1987 9
1988 7
1989 10
1990 16
1991 22
1992 11
1993 7
1994 7
1995 12
1996 7
1997 2
1998 3
1999 5
2000 12
2001 1
2002 5
2003 11
2004 9
2005 22
2006 24
2007 8
2008 11
2009 4
2010 6
2011 1
2012 4
2013 1
2014 8
2015 7
2016 4
2017 5
2018 3
2019 3
2020 2
2021 2
Total 331
Download as CSV

Emmett B. Keeler publications per year - data summary

  • Emmett B. Keeler, a Medicine scholar from RAND Corporation, has 331 publications recorded across 53 years, from 1969 to 2021.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1969 and the most recent to 2021.
  • The most productive year is 2006, with 24 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1969, 1971, 1973, 2001 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 53 years in the span carries no publications at all (1979).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.4 per year counting only the 52 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2017-2021) hold 15 publications, 5% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1969-1986: 60 publications (3.3 per year); 1987-2004: 156 publications (8.7 per year); 2005-2021: 115 publications (6.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Emmett B. Keeler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmett B. Keeler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 307 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834 307
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Emmett B. Keeler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Emmett B. Keeler, a Medicine scholar from RAND Corporation, records 307 publications - the 18th percentile of the discipline.
  • 18% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Emmett B. Keeler, and about 82% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Emmett B. Keeler ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Emmett B. Keeler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmett B. Keeler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Emmett B. Keeler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Emmett B. Keeler, a Medicine scholar from RAND Corporation, records 82 D-Index - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Emmett B. Keeler, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Emmett B. Keeler ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Emmett B. Keeler is affiliated with the RAND Corporation in the United States. Their research spans several fields, primarily focusing on Medicine and Health Professions. Within these areas, subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Surgery, and Psychiatry and Mental Health are represented in their work.

The scientist's publications frequently appear in notable venues including the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, BMJ Quality & Safety, and Health Services Research. Their recent papers cover topics related to dementia care, quality improvement in hospital settings, and healthcare access. Specific papers include:

  • The Effects of Dementia Care Co-Management on Acute Care, Hospice, and Long-Term Care Utilization (2020, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society)
  • Economic evaluation of quality improvement interventions to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the hospital setting: a systematic review (2021, BMJ Quality & Safety)
  • Validation of a Brief Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Dementia Severity (2020, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society)
  • Primary Care Physician Supply, Access to Care, and Market Adjustments to Physician Shortages (2020, Health Services Research)

Frequent collaborators in their research include Lee A. Jennings, Neil S. Wenger, David B. Reuben, Simon Hollands, and Sara G. McCleskey. These coauthors have contributed to multiple papers regional to the topics explored by Keeler.

The primary topics investigated by Emmett B. Keeler reflect a focus on care and management issues such as:

  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Surgical Site Infection Prevention
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

In recognition of their contributions to the field, Emmett B. Keeler was named a Member of the National Academy of Medicine in 2006.

Best Publications

  • Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment.

    W G Manning;J P Newhouse;N Duan;E B Keeler

  • Effect of Corticosteroids for Fetal Maturation on Perinatal Outcomes: NIH Consensus Development Panel on the Effect of Corticosteroids for Fetal Maturation on Perinatal Outcomes

    Larry C. Gilstrap;Robert Christensen;William H. Clewell;Mary E. D'Alton

  • Primer on Certain Elements of Medical Decision Making

    B J McNeil;E Keller;S J Adelstein

  • Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomized controlled trial.

    Robert H. Brook;John E. Ware;William H. Rogers;Emmett B. Keeler

  • Some Interim Results from a Controlled Trial of Cost Sharing in Health Insurance

    Joseph P. Newhouse;Willard G. Manning;Carl N. Morris;Larry L. Orr

  • A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses.

    Alexander C. Tsai;Sally C. Morton;Carol M. Mangione;Emmett B. Keeler

  • Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology

    Paul G Shekelle;Sally C Morton;Emmett B Keeler

  • The Cost Effectiveness of Preoperative Autologous Blood Donations

    Jeff A. Etchason;Lawrence D. Petz;Emmett B. Keeler;Loni Calhoun

  • Cost-Effectiveness of CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial

    William C. Black;Ilana F. Gareen;Samir S. Soneji;JoRean D. Sicks

  • Hospital characteristics and quality of care.

    Emmett B. Keeler;Lisa V. Rubenstein;Katherine L. Kahn;David Draper

  • The taxes of sin. Do smokers and drinkers pay their way

    Willard G. Manning;Emmett B. Keeler;Joseph P. Newhouse;Elizabeth M. Sloss

  • Health care for black and poor hospitalized Medicare patients.

    Katherine L. Kahn;Marjorie L. Pearson;Ellen R. Harrison;Katherine A. Desmond

  • Comparison of health outcomes at a health maintenance organisation with those of fee-for-service care.

    JohnE. Ware;WilliamH. Rogers;AllysonRoss Davies;GeorgeA. Goldberg

  • Comparing outcomes of care before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system.

    Katherine L. Kahn;Emmett B. Keeler;Marjorie J. Sherwood;William H. Rogers

  • The Costs of Poor Health Habits

    Willard G. Manning;Emmett B. Keeler;Joseph P. Newhouse;Elizabeth M. Sloss

  • The changing effects of competition on non-profit and for-profit hospital pricing behavior.

    Emmett B. Keeler;Glenn Melnick;Jack Zwanziger

  • Adjusting capitation rates using objective health measures and prior utilization

    Joseph P. Newhouse;Willard G. Manning;Emmett B. Keeler;Elizabeth M. Sloss

  • Explaining Variations in Hospital Death Rates: Randomness, Severity of Illness, Quality of Care

    Rolla Edward Park;Robert H. Brook;Jacqueline Kosecoff;Joan Keesey

  • Reducing the global burden of tuberculosis: the contribution of improved diagnostics

    Emmett Keeler;Mark D. Perkins;Peter Small;Christy Hanson

  • Measuring Quality of Care With Explicit Process Criteria Before and After Implementation of the DRG-Based Prospective Payment System

    Katherine L. Kahn;William H. Rogers;Lisa V. Rubenstein;Marjorie J. Sherwood

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert H. Brook
Robert H. Brook RAND Corporation
Joseph P. Newhouse
Joseph P. Newhouse Harvard University
Katherine L. Kahn
Katherine L. Kahn University of California, Los Angeles
Willard G. Manning
Willard G. Manning University of Chicago
William H. Rogers
William H. Rogers Tufts Medical Center
Carol M. Mangione
Carol M. Mangione University of California, Los Angeles
David B. Reuben
David B. Reuben University of California, Los Angeles
Paul G. Shekelle
Paul G. Shekelle RAND Corporation
Kathleen N. Lohr
Kathleen N. Lohr RTI International
Kenneth B. Wells
Kenneth B. Wells University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine is a diverse field, and not all healthcare careers require attending medical school. If you're seeking flexible options to advance your career, several pharm d online programs provide a pathway to becoming a pharmacist, blending clinical knowledge with patient care expertise.

For those interested in healthcare technology, health information technology programs online prepare graduates for roles managing electronic health records, data security, and compliance.

As medical administrative roles continue to grow, the cheapest medical billing and coding online courses offer an affordable way to enter the field by learning critical documentation and coding skills required by hospitals and clinics.

Registered nurses looking to expand their practice can consider the cheapest online fnp program, which offers flexibility and specialized training to become a Family Nurse Practitioner.

Each of these online options opens doors to rewarding healthcare careers without following the traditional medical school route. Choose a pathway that fits your interests, goals, and schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Emmett B. Keeler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles