World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
93
Citations
44804
World Ranking
2059
National Ranking
1124

Susannah G. Tringe publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susannah G. Tringe sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 306 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Susannah G. Tringe D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susannah G. Tringe sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Susannah G. Tringe is affiliated with the Joint Genome Institute in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within environmental science and molecular biology, focusing extensively on ecology, plant science, and oceanography.

The scientist has contributed to numerous publications over the years. Some recent papers include:

  • Plant-microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health, 2020, Nature Reviews Microbiology
  • A genomic catalog of Earth's microbiomes, 2020, Nature Biotechnology
  • Clades of huge phages from across Earth's ecosystems, 2020, Nature
  • Expansion of the global RNA virome reveals diverse clades of bacteriophages, 2022, Cell
  • Niche differentiation is spatially and temporally regulated in the rhizosphere, 2020, The ISME Journal

Their work covers a range of topics including microbial community ecology and physiology, genomics and phylogenetic studies, and environmental phenomena such as methane hydrates and geophysical measurements. Specific subjects researched are:

  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Polar Research and Ecology

Susannah G. Tringe collaborates frequently with other researchers. Notable co-authors include Scott Lea, Galya Orr, Gary Stacey, Ljiljana Paša-Tolić, and Angela Norbeck.

Research outputs have been published across various venues with the highest volume in:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • UNC Libraries
  • The ISME Journal
  • Microbiome

Their academic contributions primarily fall under the broader disciplines of Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. More focused areas include:

  • Ecology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Plant Science
  • Oceanography
  • Environmental Chemistry

Among their recognitions, Susannah G. Tringe was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health

    Pankaj Trivedi;Jan E. Leach;Susannah G. Tringe;Tongmin Sa

  • Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome

    Derek S. Lundberg;Sarah L. Lebeis;Sur Herrera Paredes;Scott Yourstone

  • Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea

    Robert M. Bowers;Nikos C. Kyrpides;Ramunas Stepanauskas;Miranda Harmon-Smith

  • Comparative Metagenomics of Microbial Communities

    Susannah Green Tringe;Christian von Mering;Arthur Kobayashi;Asaf A. Salamov

  • Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions

    Jason A. Peiffer;Aymé Spor;Omry Koren;Zhao Jin

  • Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen.

    Matthias Hess;Matthias Hess;Alexander Sczyrba;Alexander Sczyrba;Rob Egan;Rob Egan;Tae Wan Kim

  • Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite.

    Falk Warnecke;Peter Luginbühl;Natalia Ivanova;Majid Ghassemian

  • Salicylic acid modulates colonization of the root microbiome by specific bacterial taxa

    Sarah L. Lebeis;Sarah L. Lebeis;Sur Herrera Paredes;Derek S. Lundberg;Natalie Breakfield

  • Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy.

    Christian M. K. Sieber;Christian M. K. Sieber;Alexander J. Probst;Allison Sharrar;Brian C. Thomas

  • A genomic catalog of Earth’s microbiomes

    Stephen Nayfach;Simon Roux;Rekha Seshadri;Daniel Udwary

  • Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant

    Maggie R. Wagner;Derek S Lundberg;Tijana G. del Rio;Susannah G. Tringe

  • Plant Compartment and Biogeography Affect Microbiome Composition in Cultivated and Native Agave Species

    Devin Coleman‐Derr;Devin Coleman‐Derr;Damaris Desgarennes;Citlali Fonseca‐Garcia;Stephen Gross

  • Metagenomics: DNA sequencing of environmental samples.

    Susannah Green Tringe;Edward M. Rubin

  • Minimum information about an uncultivated virus genome (MIUVIG)

    Simon Roux;Evelien M. Adriaenssens;Bas E. Dutilh;Eugene V. Koonin

  • MaxBin: an automated binning method to recover individual genomes from metagenomes using an expectation-maximization algorithm.

    Yu Wei Wu;Yu Wei Wu;Yung Hsu Tang;Yung Hsu Tang;Susannah G. Tringe;Susannah G. Tringe;Blake A. Simmons;Blake A. Simmons

  • Metagenome, metatranscriptome and single-cell sequencing reveal microbial response to Deepwater Horizon oil spill

    Olivia U. Mason;Olivia U. Mason;Terry C. Hazen;Terry C. Hazen;Sharon Borglin;Patrick S. G. Chain;Patrick S. G. Chain

  • Community genomic analyses constrain the distribution of metabolic traits across the Chloroflexi phylum and indicate roles in sediment carbon cycling

    Laura A Hug;Cindy J Castelle;Kelly C Wrighton;Brian C Thomas

  • A renaissance for the pioneering 16S rRNA gene.

    Susannah G Tringe;Philip Hugenholtz

  • Genomic Expansion of Domain Archaea Highlights Roles for Organisms from New Phyla in Anaerobic Carbon Cycling

    Cindy J. Castelle;Kelly C. Wrighton;Brian C. Thomas;Laura A. Hug

  • Primer and platform effects on 16S rRNA tag sequencing.

    Julien Tremblay;Julien Tremblay;Kanwar Singh;Alison Fern;Edward S. Kirton

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip Hugenholtz
Philip Hugenholtz University of Queensland
Jillian F. Banfield
Jillian F. Banfield University of California, Berkeley
Tijana Glavina del Rio
Tijana Glavina del Rio Joint Genome Institute
Jizhong Zhou
Jizhong Zhou University of Oklahoma
Nikos C. Kyrpides
Nikos C. Kyrpides Joint Genome Institute
Katherine D. McMahon
Katherine D. McMahon University of Wisconsin–Madison
Janet K. Jansson
Janet K. Jansson Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Edward M. Rubin
Edward M. Rubin Joint Genome Institute
Natalia Ivanova
Natalia Ivanova Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Jeffery L. Dangl
Jeffery L. Dangl University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Biology or Biochemistry, numerous online degree programs can help you specialize and expand your career options. Healthcare professionals may explore asn online degrees to step into nursing or advance within clinical roles. For those passionate about the science of nutrition and wellness, earning the best online nutrition degree can lead to rewarding positions in health coaching, dietetics, and public health.

Management roles in healthcare are also in high demand. Programs like cahme accredited mha programs prepare graduates for leadership positions in medical facilities or biotech companies by focusing on both scientific knowledge and administrative skills. If your goal is advanced clinical practice or nursing leadership without mandatory in-person requirements, look into online dnp programs without clinicals.

Each of these pathways can be tailored to your interests in biology, healthcare, or management, providing flexible, accredited alternatives for career growth in the life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Susannah G. Tringe

Trending Scientists