World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
83
Citations
24017
World Ranking
3510
National Ranking
1762

Katherine D. McMahon publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine D. McMahon sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 203 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Katherine D. McMahon D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine D. McMahon sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Katherine D. McMahon is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. The main area of their research lies within Environmental Science, with a substantial focus on Ecology and Molecular Biology among other subfields. Their work encompasses various specialized topics related to microbial ecology and environmental processes.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science

The subfields in which they have contributed notably are:

  • Ecology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pollution
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Environmental Engineering

Key research topics covered in their publications involve:

  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies

Katherine D. McMahon has contributed to a range of recent scientific papers in prominent journals. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Giant virus diversity and host interactions through global metagenomics" (2020, Nature)
  • "Expansion of the global RNA virome reveals diverse clades of bacteriophages" (2022, Cell)
  • "Unraveling the functional dark matter through global metagenomics" (2023, Nature)
  • "Standardized multi-omics of Earth's microbiomes reveals microbial and metabolite diversity" (2022, Nature Microbiology)
  • "Depth-discrete metagenomics reveals the roles of microbes in biogeochemical cycling in the tropical freshwater Lake Tanganyika" (2021, The ISME Journal)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Elizabeth McDaniel
  • Patricia Q. Tran
  • Benjamin D. Peterson
  • Daniel R. Noguera
  • Robin R. Rohwer

Publication venues where they have frequently contributed consist of:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • mSystems
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Nature Microbiology
  • The ISME Journal

Best Publications

  • Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea

    Robert M. Bowers;Nikos C. Kyrpides;Ramunas Stepanauskas;Miranda Harmon-Smith

  • A Guide to the Natural History of Freshwater Lake Bacteria

    Ryan J. Newton;Stuart E. Jones;Alexander Eiler;Katherine D. McMahon

  • A genomic catalog of Earth’s microbiomes

    Stephen Nayfach;Simon Roux;Rekha Seshadri;Daniel Udwary

  • Metagenomic analysis of two enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) sludge communities

    Héctor García Martín;Natalia Ivanova;Victor Kunin;Falk Warnecke

  • Tetracycline resistance genes in activated sludge wastewater treatment plants.

    Eric A. Auerbach;Erin E. Seyfried;Katherine D. McMahon

  • Metabolic network analysis reveals microbial community interactions in anammox granules.

    Christopher E. Lawson;Sha Wu;Ananda S. Bhattacharjee;Joshua J. Hamilton

  • Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions--I. Digester performance.

    Peter G. Stroot;Katherine D. McMahon;Roderick I. Mackie;Lutgarde Raskin

  • Common principles and best practices for engineering microbiomes

    Christopher E. Lawson;William R. Harcombe;Roland Hatzenpichler;Stephen R. Lindemann

  • Methanogenic population dynamics during start-up of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and biosolids.

    Matt E. Griffin;Katherine D. McMahon;Roderick I. Mackie;Lutgarde Raskin

  • Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions-II : microbial population dynamics

    Katherine D. McMahon;Peter G. Stroot;Roderick I. Mackie;Lutgarde Raskin

  • Giant virus diversity and host interactions through global metagenomics

    Frederik Schulz;Simon Roux;David Paez-Espino;Sean Jungbluth

  • New Abundant Microbial Groups in Aquatic Hypersaline Environments

    Rohit Ghai;Lejla Pašić;Lejla Pašić;Ana Beatriz Fernández;Ana-Belen Martin-Cuadrado

  • “Candidatus Accumulibacter” Population Structure in Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Sludges as Revealed by Polyphosphate Kinase Genes

    Shaomei He;Daniel L. Gall;Katherine D. McMahon

  • Synchrony in aquatic microbial community dynamics.

    Angela D Kent;Angela D Kent;Anthony C Yannarell;Anthony C Yannarell;James A Rusak;Eric W Triplett

  • Cohesion: a method for quantifying the connectivity of microbial communities.

    Cristina M Herren;Katherine D McMahon

  • Genome-wide selective sweeps and gene-specific sweeps in natural bacterial populations

    Matthew L. Bendall;Sarah L.R. Stevens;Leong Keat Chan;Stephanie Malfatti

  • Keystone taxa predict compositional change in microbial communities.

    Cristina M. Herren;Cristina M. Herren;Katherine D. McMahon

  • Lake microbial communities are resilient after a whole-ecosystem disturbance

    Ashley Shade;Jordan S Read;Nicholas D Youngblut;Noah Fierer

  • Denitrification capabilities of two biological phosphorus removal sludges dominated by different ‘Candidatus Accumulibacter’ clades

    Jason J. Flowers;Shaomei He;Safak Yilmaz;Daniel R. Noguera

  • Microbial population dynamics during start-up and overload conditions of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and sewage sludge.

    Katherine D. McMahon;Dandan Zheng;Alfons J M Stams;Roderick Ian Mackie

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel R. Noguera
Daniel R. Noguera University of Wisconsin–Madison
Stefan Bertilsson
Stefan Bertilsson Swedish Research Council
Susannah G. Tringe
Susannah G. Tringe Joint Genome Institute
Ashley Shade
Ashley Shade Michigan State University
Stuart E. Jones
Stuart E. Jones University of Notre Dame
Hans-Peter Grossart
Hans-Peter Grossart University of Potsdam
Philip Hugenholtz
Philip Hugenholtz University of Queensland
Ramunas Stepanauskas
Ramunas Stepanauskas Bigelow Laboratory For Ocean Sciences
Natalia Ivanova
Natalia Ivanova Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Nikos C. Kyrpides
Nikos C. Kyrpides Joint Genome Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career options in Biology and Biochemistry? Advancements in online education have opened many doors in healthcare, nutrition, and management. For those interested in human health, an online nutritionist degree provides a flexible route to careers in wellness, nutrition counseling, and food science.

If your goals are in healthcare administration, consider programs like cahme accreditation mha programs, which ensure high standards and open pathways to management roles in hospitals and clinics.

For advanced nursing careers without the need for on-site clinicals, the best online dnp programs let you elevate your expertise in leadership, policy, and research while maintaining your flexibility.

Interested in senior healthcare leadership? A doctorate in healthcare management can boost your qualifications for executive and academic positions.

Whether you aspire to work directly in science or shift toward management, these online degrees offer diverse and accessible career pathways for students in Biology and Biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Katherine D. McMahon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles