World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexander T. Archibald

Alexander T. Archibald

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
12783
World Ranking
4183
National Ranking
323

Alexander T. Archibald publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander T. Archibald sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 337 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Alexander T. Archibald D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander T. Archibald sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander T. Archibald is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, focusing extensively on subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering, and Automotive Engineering.

The scientist's main topics of work include atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric ozone and climate, air quality and health impacts, climate variability and models, air quality monitoring and forecasting, and climate change and health impacts.

Archibald has contributed to numerous peer-reviewed publications with recent papers including:

  • Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere-troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1, 2020, Geoscientific model development
  • Implementation of U.K. Earth System Models for CMIP6, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report, 2020, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Frequent coauthors of Archibald's work include Nathan Luke Abraham, Paul T. Griffiths, James Keeble, Fiona M. O'Connor, and Youngsub Matthew Shin.

The scientist has published extensively in several key venues, with the most frequent publication venues being:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Archibald's research contributions predominantly address complex interactions in atmospheric chemistry, model development for Earth system processes, and evaluation of tropospheric ozone and aerosol dynamics. This body of work supports advancing understanding in air quality, climate modeling, and environmental impacts on health.

Best Publications

  • Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer

    P. S. Monks;A. T. Archibald;Augustin Colette;O. Cooper

  • UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model

    Alistair A. Sellar;Colin G. Jones;Jane P. Mulcahy;Yongming Tang

  • Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP)

    P. J. Young;P. J. Young;P. J. Young;A. T. Archibald;K. W. Bowman;J.-F. Lamarque

  • Nitrate radicals and biogenic volatile organic compounds: oxidation, mechanisms, and organic aerosol

    Nga Lee Ng;Steven S. Brown;Steven S. Brown;Alexander T. Archibald;Elliot Atlas

  • Tropospheric ozone changes, radiative forcing and attribution to emissions in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP)

    D. S. Stevenson;Paul Young;Paul Young;Paul Young;Vaishali Naik;Jean-Francois Lamarque

  • Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)

    Olaf Morgenstern;Michaela I. Hegglin;Eugene Rozanov;Fiona M. O'Connor

  • Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere–troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1

    Alexander T. Archibald;Fiona M. O'Connor;Nathan Luke Abraham;Scott Archer-Nicholls

  • Implementation of U.K. Earth system models for CMIP6

    Alistair A. Sellar;Jeremy Walton;Colin G. Jones;Richard Wood

  • Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations

    Paul T. Griffiths;Lee T. Murray;Guang Zeng;Youngsub Matthew Shin

  • Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1850 to 2100

    A. T. Archibald;J. L. Neu;Y. F. Elshorbany;O. R. Cooper;O. R. Cooper

  • Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations

    Sandip S. Dhomse;Douglas Kinnison;Martyn P. Chipperfield;Ross J. Salawitch

  • Impacts of mechanistic changes on HO x formation and recycling in the oxidation of isoprene

    A.T Archibald;A.T Archibald;M.C Cooke;S.R Utembe;Dudley E Shallcross

  • Regional and global impacts of Criegee intermediates on atmospheric sulphuric acid concentrations and first steps of aerosol formation

    Carl J. Percival;Oliver Welz;Arkke J. Eskola;John D. Savee

  • Atlantic Multidecadal Variability and the U.K. ACSIS Program

    R.T. Sutton;Gerard D. McCarthy;James Robson;B. Sinha

  • Source-Receptor Relationship Revealed by the Halted Traffic and Aggravated Haze in Beijing during the COVID-19 Lockdown.

    Zhaofeng Lv;Xiaotong Wang;Fanyuan Deng;Qi Ying

  • Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models

    Gillian Thornhill;William Collins;Dirk Olivié;Ragnhild B. Skeie

  • Supplementary material to "Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere-troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1"

    Unknown

  • Molecular composition of organic aerosols in central Amazonia: An ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry study

    Ivan Kourtchev;Ivan Kourtchev;Ricardo H. M. Godoi;Sarah Connors;James G. Levine

  • Implementation of the Fast-JX Photolysis scheme (v6.4) into the UKCA component of the MetUM chemistry-climate model (v7.3)

    P. J. Telford;N. L. Abraham;A. T. Archibald;P. Braesicke

  • Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period

    Yuanhong Zhao;Marielle Saunois;Philippe Bousquet;Xin Lin;Xin Lin

  • Lightning NO x , a key chemistry–climate interaction: impacts of future climate change and consequences for tropospheric oxidising capacity

    A. Banerjee;A. T. Archibald;A. C. Maycock;P. Telford

  • Stratospheric ozone loss over the Eurasian continent induced by the polar vortex shift.

    Jiankai Zhang;Wenshou Tian;Fei Xie;Martyn P. Chipperfield

  • Impacts of HOx regeneration and recycling in the oxidation of isoprene: Consequences for the composition of past, present and future atmospheres

    A.T. Archibald;James G. Levine;N.L. Abraham;M.C. Cooke

Frequent Co-Authors

John A. Pyle
John A. Pyle University of Cambridge
Dudley E. Shallcross
Dudley E. Shallcross University of Bristol
Michael E. Jenkin
Michael E. Jenkin University of Bristol
Carl J. Percival
Carl J. Percival University of Manchester
Paul Young
Paul Young Lancaster University
Olaf Morgenstern
Olaf Morgenstern National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Guang Zeng
Guang Zeng National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
David A. Plummer
David A. Plummer Environment and Climate Change Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences can lead to diverse career opportunities, many of which intersect with other fields. For instance, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly essential for environmental data analysis and mapping. Students interested in integrating technology with environmental research may consider exploring the best gis graduate programs, which offer specialized training in spatial data management.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy and management, a Master of Public Administration (MPA) can be a valuable addition. Accelerated options, such as the one year mpa programs, equip professionals with leadership skills that drive sustainable initiatives within government and nonprofit sectors.

Understanding societal factors is crucial in addressing environmental challenges. An online sociology degree bachelors provides insights into human behavior and social structures, enhancing the impact of environmental outreach and education.

For educators and professionals seeking advanced leadership roles without the lengthy dissertation process, online ed d programs without dissertation offer practical doctoral training, often focusing on organizational change and program development in environmental education settings.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander T. Archibald

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles