World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
114
Citations
43578
World Ranking
4780
National Ranking
2590

Jane C. Weeks publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane C. Weeks sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 340 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jane C. Weeks D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane C. Weeks sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane C. Weeks was affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily focused on Medicine, with a significant concentration in Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, as well as Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

Their work spanned several key topics including Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology, Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies, Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes, Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments, Cancer survivorship and care, and Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies.

They published research in various venues, frequently contributing to UNC Libraries, as well as Supportive Care in Cancer and Research Square. Notable recent papers included:

  • Chemotherapy use and patient treatment preferences in advanced colorectal cancer: A prospective cohort study, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Does a multidisciplinary menopausal symptoms after cancer clinic reduce symptoms?, 2021, Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Does a Multidisciplinary Menopausal Symptoms after Cancer Clinic Reduce Symptoms?, 2021, Research Square (Research Square)
  • Early dissemination of bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective cohort study, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Comparative Effectiveness of Oxaliplatin vs Non-Oxaliplatin-containing Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer, 2020, UNC Libraries

Throughout their career, Jane C. Weeks frequently collaborated with other researchers. Their most common co-authors included:

  • Katherine L. Kahn
  • S. Yousuf Zafar
  • Jennifer L. Malin
  • Steven C. Grambow
  • David H. Abbott

The research contributions of Jane C. Weeks spanned multiple disciplines within medical science, with a prominent emphasis on cancer-related studies, particularly colorectal and gastric cancers, treatment efficacy, and patient-centered outcomes such as symptom management and survivorship. Their work also included investigations into menopausal symptom management in cancer patients, linking oncology with endocrine health.

Best Publications

  • 2000 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Hematopoietic Colony-Stimulating Factors: Evidence-Based, Clinical Practice Guidelines*

    Thomas J. Smith;Howard Ozer;Langdon L. Miller;Charles A. Schiffer

  • Symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer.

    Joanne Wolfe;Holcombe E. Grier;Neil Klar;Sarah B. Levin

  • Relationship Between Cancer Patients' Predictions of Prognosis and Their Treatment Preferences

    Jane Weeks;E. Francis Cook;Steven J. O'Day;Lynn M. Peterson

  • Patients’ Expectations about Effects of Chemotherapy for Advanced Cancer

    Jane C. Weeks;Paul J. Catalano;Angel Cronin;Matthew D. Finkelman

  • Aggressiveness of Cancer Care Near the End of Life: Is It a Quality-of-Care Issue?

    Craig C. Earle;Mary Beth Landrum;Jeffrey M. Souza;Bridget A. Neville

  • Trends in the Aggressiveness of Cancer Care Near the End of Life

    Craig C. Earle;Bridget A. Neville;Mary Beth Landrum;John Z. Ayanian

  • Short-term Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Randomized Trial

    Jane C. Weeks;Heidi Nelson;Shari Gelber;Daniel Sargent

  • Identifying Potential Indicators of the Quality of End-of-Life Cancer Care From Administrative Data

    Craig C. Earle;Elyse R. Park;Bonnie Lai;Jane C. Weeks

  • Use of alternative medicine by women with early-stage breast cancer.

    Harold J. Burstein;Shari Gelber;Edward Guadagnoli;Jane C. Weeks

  • End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences.

    Jennifer W. Mack;Jane C. Weeks;Alexi A. Wright;Susan D. Block

  • Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey

    Steven Joffe;Steven Joffe;E Francis Cook;Paul D Cleary;Jeffrey W Clark

  • Clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival among women with triple‐negative breast cancer in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

    Nancy U. Lin;Ann Vanderplas;Melissa E. Hughes;Richard L. Theriault

  • Single-Agent Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (study 9730)

    Rogerio C. Lilenbaum;James E. Herndon;Marcy A. List;Chris Desch

  • Associations Between End-of-Life Discussion Characteristics and Care Received Near Death: A Prospective Cohort Study

    Jennifer W. Mack;Angel Cronin;Nancy L. Keating;Nathan Taback

  • Decision analysis - Effects of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy on life expectancy among women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations

    Deborah Schrag;Karen M. Kuntz;Judy E. Garber;Jane C. Weeks

  • Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines

    John Fetting;Paul Anderson;Harrison Ball;John Benear

  • Understanding of prognosis among parents of children who died of cancer: impact on treatment goals and integration of palliative care.

    Joanne Wolfe;Neil Klar;Holcombe E. Grier;Janet Duncan

  • Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects

    Steven Joffe;E. Francis Cook;Paul D. Cleary;Jeffrey W. Clark

  • Hepatic Arterial Infusion Versus Systemic Therapy for Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial of Efficacy, Quality of Life, and Molecular Markers (CALGB 9481)

    Nancy E. Kemeny;Donna Niedzwiecki;Donna R. Hollis;Heinz-Josef Lenz

  • End-of-life care discussions among patients with advanced cancer: a cohort study.

    Jennifer W. Mack;Angel Cronin;Nathan Taback;Haiden A. Huskamp

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen B. Edge
Stephen B. Edge Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Katherine L. Kahn
Katherine L. Kahn University of California, Los Angeles
Richard L. Theriault
Richard L. Theriault The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Deborah Schrag
Deborah Schrag Harvard University
Karen M. Kuntz
Karen M. Kuntz University of Minnesota
Nancy L. Keating
Nancy L. Keating Harvard University
Milton C. Weinstein
Milton C. Weinstein Harvard University
Craig C. Earle
Craig C. Earle University of Toronto
Eric P. Winer
Eric P. Winer Yale University
Stuart R. Lipsitz
Stuart R. Lipsitz Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring healthcare careers outside of traditional medicine opens up a range of opportunities. For students looking for flexible and affordable options, online degrees provide access to specialized fields that are in high demand across the healthcare sector.

Those interested in health data can pursue rhit programs online, which prepare graduates to manage patient records and ensure the security of sensitive information. If you prefer administrative roles, affordable medical billing and coding programs offer the skills needed to process health insurance claims and support healthcare providers.

For students aiming to enter advanced clinical practice, exploring cheap online fnp programs leads to a rewarding career as a family nurse practitioner. Additionally, if you’re concerned about tuition costs, it’s important to consider how much is online nursing school before enrolling.

Each of these pathways provides unique ways to make an impact in healthcare, often with the flexibility and convenience of online study.

Best Scientists Citing Jane C. Weeks

Recently Published Articles