World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Glenda Andrews publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Glenda Andrews between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Glenda Andrews published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2012. 3 of the 86 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2012. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 9 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1997 2025

86 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Glenda Andrews: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 5
1999 1
2000 2
2001 1
2002 3
2003 1
2004 4
2005 1
2006 5
2007 7
2008 4
2009 1
2010 2
2011 1
2012 9
2013 2
2014 7
2015 2
2016 2
2017 4
2018 3
2019 7
2020 3
2021 3
2022 2
2023 0
2024 2
2025 1
Total 86
Download as CSV

Glenda Andrews publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenda Andrews sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Glenda Andrews D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenda Andrews sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Glenda Andrews is affiliated with Griffith University in Australia, contributing to the field of psychology with a focus on experimental and cognitive psychology. Their research spans several subfields including developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • "A Game a Day Keeps Cognitive Decline Away? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Commercially-Available Brain Training Programs in Healthy and Cognitively Impaired Older Adults" (2021, Neuropsychology Review)
  • "Gender Differences in Self-Estimated Intelligence: Exploring the Male Hubris, Female Humility Problem" (2022, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Self-referent encoding facilitates memory binding in young children: New insights into the self-reference effect in memory development" (2020, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology)
  • "A Cross-Cultural Study of Theory of Mind Using Strange Stories in School-Aged Children from Australia and Mainland China" (2021, Journal of Cognition and Development)
  • "Relations between Executive Functions, Theory of Mind, and Functional Outcomes in Middle Childhood" (2021, Developmental Neuropsychology)

Frequently publishing in journals such as Developmental Neuropsychology, Neuropsychology Review, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Cognition and Development, and Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Andrews has contributed substantially to these venues.

The main topics of research focus on:

  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Their frequent collaborators include Karen Murphy, David Shum, Lan Nguyen, David L. Neumann, and Si Wang, indicating ongoing partnerships in research.

Andrews' work encompasses a thorough examination of cognitive processes, developmental aspects of learning, and the interplay between psychological functions and social contexts, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach within psychology.

Best Publications

  • Preschool home literacy practices and children's literacy development: A longitudinal analysis.

    Michelle Heather Hood;Elizabeth Gwendolyne Conlon;Glenda Andrews

  • Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: a new hypothesis

    Graeme Sydney Halford;Nelson Cowan;Glenda Andrews

  • Gender differences in reading and writing achievement: Evidence from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).

    David Reilly;David L. Neumann;Glenda Andrews

  • Sex Differences in Mathematics and Science Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of National Assessment of Educational Progress Assessments.

    David Reilly;David L. Neumann;Glenda Andrews

  • A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development.

    Glenda Andrews;Graeme S Halford

  • Theory of mind and relational complexity.

    Glenda Andrews;Graeme Sydney Halford;Katie M. Bunch;Darryl Bowden

  • Investigating Gender Differences in Mathematics and Science: Results from the 2011 Trends in Mathematics and Science Survey

    David Reilly;David L. Neumann;Glenda Andrews

  • Gender Differences in Spatial Ability: Implications for STEM Education and Approaches to Reducing the Gender Gap for Parents and Educators

    David Reilly;David L. Neumann;Glenda Andrews

  • Young children's performance on the balance scale: the influence of relational complexity.

    Graeme Sydney Halford;Glenda Andrews;Cherie Dalton;Christine Boag

  • Immediate and Long-Term Efficacy of Executive Functions Cognitive Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Lan Nguyen;Karen Murphy;Glenda Andrews

  • Children's ability to make transitive inferences: The importance of premise integration and structural complexity

    Glenda Andrews;Graeme S. Halford

  • Cognitive and neural plasticity in old age: A systematic review of evidence from executive functions cognitive training.

    Lan Nguyen;Karen Murphy;Glenda Andrews

  • Induction of Relational Schemas: Common Processes in Reasoning and Complex Learning

    Graeme S. Halford;John D. Bain;Murray T. Maybery;Glenda Andrews

  • Measuring the Influence of Complexity on Relational Reasoning: The Development of the Latin Square Task

    Damian P. Birney;Graeme S. Halford;Glenda Andrews

  • Sex and sex-role differences in specific cognitive abilities

    David Reilly;David L. Neumann;Glenda Andrews

  • Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences.

    Glenda Andrews;Damian Birney;Graeme Sydney Halford

  • Complexity effects on the children's gambling task

    Katie Maree Bunch;Glenda Andrews;Graeme Sydney Halford

  • The development of deductive reasoning: How important is complexity?

    Graeme S Halford;Glenda Andrews

  • Executive function in middle childhood and the relationship with theory of mind.

    Jennifer Wilson;Glenda Andrews;Christy Hogan;Si Wang

  • Reasoning and Problem Solving

    Graeme Sydney Halford;Glenda Andrews

Frequent Co-Authors

Graeme S. Halford
Graeme S. Halford Griffith University
David Shum
David Shum Hong Kong Polytechnic University
David L. Neumann
David L. Neumann Griffith University
Margaret J. Wright
Margaret J. Wright University of Queensland
Sarah E. Medland
Sarah E. Medland QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jodie N. Painter
Jodie N. Painter QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Gail Davies
Gail Davies University of Edinburgh
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Grant W. Montgomery
Grant W. Montgomery University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a diverse range of online degree programs and career pathways. Many students interested in psychology consider careers in social work, counseling, human services, and related fields. Online degrees in psychology or social work offer flexible learning options, making it easier for working professionals or those with family commitments.

To become a social worker, requirements vary by state. For example, Massachusetts social work license requirements outline specific educational credentials and supervised experience. In Michigan, the process is detailed in becoming a social worker in Michigan, where licensure typically requires a degree from an accredited program.

Similarly, students interested in moving or practicing elsewhere should review how to become a social worker in Minnesota and Mississippi social work education requirements for state-specific pathways. As you explore related online degrees, it’s important to research the educational and licensing requirements for your intended state to ensure your career goals align with local standards.

Best Scientists Citing Glenda Andrews

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles