World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
36
Citations
5457
World Ranking
6494
National Ranking
3140

Deborah Simpson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah Simpson sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 220 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Deborah Simpson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah Simpson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Deborah Simpson is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States and contributes primarily to the field of Medicine. Their research encompasses several subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Education, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Gender Studies.

Their scholarly work covers various topics such as Innovations in Medical Education, Diversity and Career in Medicine, Radiology practices and education, Interprofessional Education and Collaboration, Health Sciences Research and Education, Health and Medical Research Impacts, and Reflective Practices in Education.

Simpson has published extensively in a number of academic venues. Frequent publication platforms include:

  • Journal of Graduate Medical Education
  • Innovation in Aging
  • Journal of patient-centered research and reviews
  • MedEdPORTAL
  • Academic Medicine

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Simpson include:

  • "Program Evaluation: Getting Started and Standards" (2020, Journal of Graduate Medical Education)
  • "Envisioning Graduate Medical Education in 2030" (2020, Journal of Graduate Medical Education)
  • "Got 15? Try Faculty Development on the Fly: A Snippets Workshop for Microlearning" (2021, MedEdPORTAL)
  • "Optimizing the Physical Clinical Learning Environment for Teaching" (2020, Journal of Graduate Medical Education)
  • "Blueprinting Program Evaluation Evidence Through the Lens of Key Stakeholders" (2020, Journal of Graduate Medical Education)

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Gail M. Sullivan
  • Anthony R. Artino
  • Lalena M. Yarris
  • Nicole M. Deiorio
  • Dorene F. Balmer

Simpson's work primarily addresses issues related to medical education and program evaluation, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach that intersects educational methods, health professions, and clinical environment optimization. The citation counts of their recent works indicate engagement within the research community on topics surrounding educational strategies and program development in graduate medical education.

Best Publications

  • Keeping Granny Safe on July 1: A Consensus on Minimum Geriatrics Competencies for Graduating Medical Students

    Rosanne M. Leipzig;Lisa Granville;Deborah Simpson;M Brownell Anderson

  • Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship.

    Deborah Simpson;Ruth Marie E Fincher;Janet P. Hafler;David M. Irby

  • Scholarship in teaching: an imperative for the 21st century

    Ruth Marie E Fincher;Deborah E. Simpson;Stewart P. Mennin;Gary C. Rosenfeld

  • Strategies for efficient and effective teaching in the ambulatory care setting

    Gary Ferenchick;Deborah Simpson;James Blackman;Debra DaRosa

  • Attitudes of internal medicine faculty and residents toward professional interaction with pharmaceutical sales representatives.

    McKinney Wp;Schiedermayer Dl;Lurie N;Simpson De

  • A survey of sued and nonsued physicians and suing patients.

    Robyn S. Shapiro;Deborah E. Simpson;Steven L. Lawrence;Anne Marie Talsky

  • Pharmaceutical representatives in academic medical centers: interaction with faculty and housestaff.

    N Lurie;E C Rich;D E Simpson;J Meyer

  • Educational fellowship programs: common themes and overarching issues.

    Larry D. Gruppen;Deborah Simpson;Nancy S. Searle;Lynne Robins

  • The search for effective and efficient ambulatory teaching methods through the literature.

    Charlotte Heidenreich;Patricia Lye;Deborah Simpson;Mary Lourich

  • An alternative approach to defining the role of the clinical teacher.

    J A Ullian;C J Bland;D E Simpson

  • A descriptive, cross-sectional study of formal mentoring for faculty.

    J A Morzinski;S Diehr;D J Bower;D E Simpson

  • Documentation systems for educators seeking academic promotion in U.S. medical schools.

    Deborah Simpson;Janet Hafler;Diane Brown;Lu Ann Wilkerson

  • Influence of sleep deprivation on learning among surgical house staff and medical students

    B J Browne;T Van Susteren;D R Onsager;D Simpson

  • Learning/feedback activities and high-quality teaching: perceptions of third-year medical students during an inpatient rotation.

    Dario Torre;Deborah Simpson;James Sebastian;D Elnicki

  • Faculty development through formal mentoring.

    Jeffrey A. Morzinski;Deborah E. Simpson;Douglas J. Bower;Sabina Diehr

  • Meeting the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies using established residency training program assessment tools.

    Karen J Brasel;Dawn Bragg;Deborah E Simpson;John A Weigelt

  • Evaluating educators using a novel toolbox: applying rigorous criteria flexibly across institutions

    Maryellen E. Gusic;Constance D. Baldwin;Latha Chandran;Suzanne Rose

  • Feasibility, Reliability and User Satisfaction With a PDA-Based Mini-CEX to Evaluate the Clinical Skills of Third-Year Medical Students

    Dario M Torre;Deborah E Simpson;D Michael Elnicki;James L Sebastian

  • Fifteen years of aligning faculty development with primary care clinician-educator roles and academic advancement at the Medical College of Wisconsin.

    Deborah Simpson;Karen Marcdante;Jeffrey Morzinski;Linda Meurer

  • Learning activities and high-quality teaching: perceptions of third-year IM clerkship students.

    Dario M. Torre;James L. Sebastian;Deborah E. Simpson

  • Job Roles of the 2025 Medical Educator.

    Deborah Simpson;Karen Marcdante;Kevin H Souza;Andy Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony R. Artino
Anthony R. Artino George Washington University
Karen J. Brasel
Karen J. Brasel Medical College of Wisconsin
David M. Irby
David M. Irby University of California, San Francisco
Nicole Lurie
Nicole Lurie Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations
Larry D. Gruppen
Larry D. Gruppen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Debra A. DaRosa
Debra A. DaRosa Northwestern University
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania
Henry W. Strobel
Henry W. Strobel The University of Texas at Austin
Arthur L. Haas
Arthur L. Haas Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans
Margaret L. Stuber
Margaret L. Stuber University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open up flexible pathways for students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities. Many universities in the USA are now offering 1 year masters programs that allow graduates to advance their skills rapidly and efficiently.

For those at the undergraduate level, accelerated online degree programs can help you earn a bachelor's in less time, offering both convenience and cost savings. These programs are ideal for students balancing work, family, or other commitments.

If your interests lie in the fields of social work or behavioral analysis, affordability is a key consideration. There are several options for cheapest online master's in social work, enabling you to gain advanced credentials without excessive student debt.

Similarly, obtaining a credential as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) can significantly enhance your career prospects. Investigate the bcba certification online cost to make an informed, budget-conscious choice as you plan your professional future.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah Simpson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles