World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
57
Citations
12453
World Ranking
1785
National Ranking
851

Scott M. Wright publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott M. Wright sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 251 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Scott M. Wright D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott M. Wright sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott M. Wright is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and health professions, focusing particularly on innovations in medical education and patient care.

The main fields of study for Scott M. Wright include:

  • Medicine
  • Health Professions

Their subfields of study reflect diverse interests within health disciplines:

  • General Health Professions
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

The primary topics in their work cover:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Scott M. Wright has contributed articles to several publication venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Postgraduate Medical Journal
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • BMC Medical Education
  • Journal of the National Medical Association
  • Frontiers in Public Health

Among recent papers associated with this researcher are:

  • Global Burden of Childhood Epilepsy, Intellectual Disability, and Sensory Impairments, published in 2020 in PEDIATRICS
  • How Visual Arts-Based Education Can Promote Clinical Excellence, published in 2020 in Academic Medicine
  • Measuring Flourishing Among Internal Medicine and Psychiatry Residents, published in 2020 in Journal of Graduate Medical Education
  • Cerebral palsy and developmental intellectual disability in children younger than 5 years: Findings from the GBD-WHO Rehabilitation Database 2019, published in 2022 in Frontiers in Public Health
  • Healthcare distrust among hospitalised black patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, published in 2021 in Postgraduate Medical Journal

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Ché Matthew Harris
  • Sean Tackett
  • Bolajoko O. Olusanya
  • Mijna Hadders-Algra
  • Susan Mirabal

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive Discharge Planning With Postdischarge Support for Older Patients With Congestive Heart Failure: A Meta-analysis

    Christopher O. Phillips;Scott M. Wright;David E. Kern;Ramesh M. Singa

  • Association between funding and quality of published medical education research.

    Darcy A. Reed;David A. Cook;Thomas J. Beckman;Rachel B. Levine

  • Developmental disabilities among children younger than 5 years in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

    Bolajoko O. Olusanya;Adrian C. Davis;Donald Wertlieb;Nem-Yun Boo

  • The Impact of Role Models on Medical Students

    Scott Wright;Annie Wong;Carol Newill

  • Doctor role modelling in medical education: BEME Guide No. 27

    Unknown

  • Predictive validity evidence for medical education research study quality instrument scores: quality of submissions to JGIM's Medical Education Special Issue.

    Darcy A. Reed;Thomas J. Beckman;Scott M. Wright;Rachel B. Levine

  • Promotion criteria for clinician-educators

    Ayse A. Atasoylu;Scott M. Wright;Brent W. Beasley;Joseph Cofrancesco

  • Promotion criteria for clinician-educators in the United States and Canada. A survey of promotion committee chairpersons.

    Brent W. Beasley;Scott M. Wright;Joseph Cofrancesco;Stewart F. Babbott

  • National survey of internal medicine residency program directors regarding problem residents

    David C. Yao;Scott M. Wright

  • Excellence in role modelling: insight and perspectives from the pros.

    Scott M. Wright;Joseph A. Carrese

  • A Systematic Review of Teamwork Training Interventions in Medical Student and Resident Education

    Chayan Chakraborti;Romsai T. Boonyasai;Scott M. Wright;David E. Kern

  • Challenges in systematic reviews of educational intervention studies.

    Darcy Reed;Eboni G. Price;Donna M. Windish;Scott M. Wright

  • Completing a scholarly project during residency training. Perspectives of residents who have been successful.

    Josette A. Rivera;Rachel B. Levine;Scott M. Wright

  • Stories From Early-Career Women Physicians Who Have Left Academic Medicine: A Qualitative Study at a Single Institution

    Rachel B. Levine;Fenny Lin;David E. Kern;Scott M. Wright

  • Global Burden of Childhood Epilepsy, Intellectual Disability, and Sensory Impairments

    Bolajoko O. Olusanya;Scott M. Wright;M.K.C. Nair;Nem-Yun Boo

  • Faculty development in teaching skills: an intensive longitudinal model.

    Karan A Cole;L Randol Barker;Ken Kolodner;Penelope Williamson

  • The impact of prompted narrative writing during internship on reflective practice: a qualitative study

    Rachel B. Levine;David E. Kern;Scott M. Wright

  • A systematic review of resident research curricula

    Randy S. Hebert;Rachel B. Levine;Cheri G. Smith;Scott M. Wright

  • Resident research and scholarly activity in internal medicine residency training programs.

    Rachel B. Levine;Randy S. Hebert;Scott M. Wright

  • Morbidity and mortality conference, grand rounds, and the ACGME’s core competencies

    Steven J. Kravet;Eric Howell;Scott M. Wright

  • Costs and funding for published medical education research

    Darcy A. Reed;David E. Kern;Rachel B. Levine;Scott M. Wright

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Kern
David E. Kern Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Eric B. Bass
Eric B. Bass Johns Hopkins University
Jonathan M. Zenilman
Jonathan M. Zenilman Johns Hopkins University
Marie Diener-West
Marie Diener-West Johns Hopkins University
Bolajoko O. Olusanya
Bolajoko O. Olusanya Centre for Healthy Start Initiative
David W. Eisele
David W. Eisele Johns Hopkins University
Felix Akpojene Ogbo
Felix Akpojene Ogbo Western Sydney University
Paul Haidet
Paul Haidet Pennsylvania State University
Frederick L. Brancati
Frederick L. Brancati Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The fields of Social Sciences and Humanities offer diverse and rewarding career paths, many of which can be accessed through flexible online degree programs. Prospective students interested in helping professions may want to explore cacrep online counseling programs for accredited pathways in mental health counseling. Similarly, those passionate about supporting families can consider an marriage and family therapist degree to build careers in therapy practices or community agencies.

For students seeking a broader foundation, an accredited online psychology degree provides entry routes into research, counseling, or social services. If your goal is to advance within social work, explore the masters in social work online programs that emphasize accessibility and practical training.

These online degree options offer affordability, flexibility, and strong career prospects, making them attractive pathways for students ready to make a positive impact in their communities.

Best Scientists Citing Scott M. Wright

Trending Scientists