World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
5096
World Ranking
7672
National Ranking
73

Kerstin Tham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kerstin Tham sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 79 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kerstin Tham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kerstin Tham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kerstin Tham is affiliated with the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, where they focus their research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Occupational Therapy.

Their scholarly contributions primarily address topics related to Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders, Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation, and Occupational Therapy Practice and Research. These thematic areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach aimed at improving clinical practice and patient outcomes.

The scientist has published research in notable venues, including:

  • BMC Neurology
  • Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Recent papers authored by Kerstin Tham include:

  • "F@ce: a team-based, person-centred intervention for rehabilitation after stroke supported by information and communication technology - a feasibility study," published in 2020 in BMC Neurology
  • "Activities in Daily Living: The development of a new client-centred ADL intervention for persons with stroke," published in 2020 in Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts are:

  • Susanne Guidetti
  • Martha Gustavsson
  • Magnus Andersson
  • Uno Fors
  • Charlotte Ytterberg

The researcher's focus on stroke rehabilitation integrates technology and client-centered methods, as reflected in their recent work. Their studies often emphasize rehabilitation interventions that leverage information and communication technology to support recovery processes.

By working across multiple related fields and collaborating with other researchers, Kerstin Tham's contributions address complex challenges associated with neurological disorders and rehabilitation practices. Their publications provide insight into the development of interventions that prioritize personalized care and functional recovery in clinical settings.

Best Publications

  • Sustained attention training for unilateral neglect: Theoretical and rehabilitation implications

    Ian H. Robertson;Richard Tegnér;Kerstin Tham;Ada Lo

  • Combined life satisfaction of persons with stroke and their caregivers: associations with caregiver burden and the impact of stroke

    Aileen L Bergström;Gunilla Eriksson;Lena von Koch;Kerstin Tham;Kerstin Tham

  • The baking tray task: a test of spatial neglect

    Kerstin Tham

  • Participation in Complex and Social Everyday Activities Six Years after Stroke: Predictors for Return to Pre-Stroke Level

    Avvai Singam;Charlotte Ytterberg;Charlotte Ytterberg;Kerstin Tham;Kerstin Tham;Lena von Koch;Lena von Koch

  • Occupational gaps in everyday life 1-4 years after acquired brain injury.

    Gunilla Eriksson;Kerstin Tham;Jörgen Borg

  • The discovery of disability : A phenomenological study of unilateral neglect

    Kerstin Tham;Lena Borell;Anders Gustavsson

  • Rehabilitation at home after stroke: a descriptive study of an individualized intervention

    Lena von Koch;Lotta Widén Holmqvist;Annica Wohlin Wottrich;Kerstin Tham

  • Sustained attention and awareness of disability in chronic neglect.

    Haukur Hjaltason;Richard Tegnér;Kerstin Tham;Maria Levander

  • The Meaning of Rehabilitation in the Home Environment After Acute Stroke From the Perspective of a Multiprofessional Team

    Annica Wohlin Wottrich;Lena von Koch;Kerstin Tham

  • Relationship between occupational gaps in everyday life, depressive mood and life satisfaction after acquired brain injury.

    Gunilla Eriksson;Anders Kottorp;Jörgen Borg;Kerstin Tham

  • P-drive: assessment of driving performance after stroke.

    Ann-Helen Patomella;Kerstin Tham;Anders Kottorp

  • Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient's and therapist's perspective.

    Annica Wohlin Wottrich;Christina H Stenström;Margareta Engardt;Kerstin Tham

  • Training to improve awareness of disabilities in clients with unilateral neglect.

    Kerstin Tham;Elisabeth Ginsburg;Anne G. Fisher;Richard Tegnér

  • Participation in everyday life and life satisfaction in persons with stroke and their caregivers 3-6 months after onset.

    Aileen L. Bergström;Lena von Koch;Magnus Andersson;Kerstin Tham

  • The meaning of work after acquired brain injury.

    Ulla Johansson;Kerstin Tham

  • Video feedback in the rehabilitation of patients with unilateral neglect

    Kerstin Tham;Richard Tegnér

  • The meaning of the working cooperative for persons with long-term mental illness: a phenomenological study.

    Kitty Gahnström-Strandqvist;Anneli Liukko;Kerstin Tham

  • Development of the Assessment of Awareness of Disability

    Kerstin Tham;Birgitta Bernspång;Anne G. Fisher

  • Therapeutic strategies used by occupational therapists in self-care training: a qualitative study.

    Susanne Guidetti;Kerstin Tham

  • Using electronic aids to daily living after acquired brain injury: A study of the learning process and the usability

    I L Boman;K Tham;A Granqvist;A Bartfai

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne G. Fisher
Anne G. Fisher Colorado State University
Ian H. Robertson
Ian H. Robertson Trinity College Dublin
Axel R. Fugl-Meyer
Axel R. Fugl-Meyer Uppsala University
Ian Nimmo-Smith
Ian Nimmo-Smith MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers, particularly in mental health counseling. To become a counselor, requirements often include earning a relevant degree, gaining supervised clinical experience, and securing state licensure. Online psychology degrees can be a flexible path to meeting these requirements, especially for those balancing work or personal commitments.

Each state and even some cities may have unique educational and licensing standards. For example, you can explore mental health counselor requirements in Boston if you plan to work in Massachusetts. If your interest lies in New York, learn more about how to become a mental health counselor in Buffalo. Aspiring counselors in Arizona can read about how to become a mental health counselor in Chandler. Similarly, those in North Carolina should review the Charlotte mental health counselor education requirements.

Taking time to research these local guidelines ensures you choose the right online degree and understand additional steps—like internships or exams—needed for your career path. An online psychology program can be your foundation, while supplementing it with required practical experience and state-specific licensure.

Best Scientists Citing Kerstin Tham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles