World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
59
Citations
13722
World Ranking
1566
National Ranking
751

Paul Haidet publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Haidet sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Paul Haidet D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Haidet sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Haidet is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with a focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental Health, General Health Professions, Education, and Health Information Management.

The main topics covered in their work include Innovations in Medical Education, Empathy and Medical Education, Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills, Film in Education and Therapy, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Diabetes Management and Research, and Education and Critical Thinking Development.

Frequent co-authors of Paul Haidet include Tracy Moniz, Carolyn M. Melro, Nancy Adams, Benjamin Vipler, and Javeed Sukhera.

They have published notably in the following venues:

  • Academic Medicine
  • Patient Education and Counseling
  • Perspectives on Medical Education
  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Paul Haidet include:

  • "How Are the Arts and Humanities Used in Medical Education? Results of a Scoping Review" (2021, Academic Medicine)
  • "The prism model: advancing a theory of practice for arts and humanities in medical education" (2021, Perspectives on Medical Education)
  • "The Prism Model for Integrating the Arts and Humanities Into Medical Education" (2021, Academic Medicine)
  • "Integrating Oral Health into Health Professions School Curricula" (2022, Medical Education Online)
  • "Clinical decision support to improve management of diabetes and dysglycemia in the hospital: a path to optimizing practice and outcomes" (2021, BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care)

Best Publications

  • Understanding Concordance in Patient-Physician Relationships: Personal and Ethnic Dimensions of Shared Identity

    Richard L. Street;Kimberly J. O'Malley;Lisa A. Cooper;Paul Haidet

  • Physicians’ communication and perceptions of patients: Is it how they look, how they talk, or is it just the doctor?

    Richard L. Street;Howard Gordon;Paul Haidet

  • Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of health services: bias, preferences, or poor communication?

    Carol M. Ashton;Paul Haidet;Paul Haidet;Debora A. Paterniti;Debora A. Paterniti;Tracie C. Collins;Tracie C. Collins

  • The Role of the Student-Teacher Relationship in the Formation of Physicians: The Hidden Curriculum as Process

    Paul Haidet;Howard F. Stein

  • Physician overestimation of patient literacy: a potential source of health care disparities.

    P. Adam Kelly;Paul Haidet

  • Team-based learning at ten medical schools: two years later.

    Britta M Thompson;Virginia F Schneider;Paul Haidet;Paul Haidet;Ruth E Levine

  • Teaching the Human Dimensions of Care in Clinical Settings

    William T. Branch;David Kern;Paul Haidet;Peter Weissmann

  • Medical student attitudes toward the doctor-patient relationship

    Paul Haidet;Joyce E Dains;Debora A Paterniti;Laura Hechtel

  • Perspective: Guidelines for reporting team-based learning activities in the medical and health sciences education literature.

    Paul Haidet;Ruth E. Levine;Dean X. Parmelee;Sheila Crow

  • A controlled trial of active versus passive learning strategies in a large group setting.

    Paul Haidet;Robert O. Morgan;Kimberly O'Malley;Betty Jeanne Moran

  • How Well Do Doctors Know their Patients? Factors Affecting Physician Understanding of Patients’ Health Beliefs

    Richard L. Street;Richard L. Street;Paul Haidet

  • Role modeling humanistic behavior: learning bedside manner from the experts.

    Peter F. Weissmann;Peter F. Weissmann;William T. Branch;Catherine F. Gracey;Paul Haidet

  • Beliefs about control in the physician-patient relationship: effect on communication in medical encounters.

    Richard L. Street;Edward Krupat;Robert A. Bell;Richard L. Kravitz

  • The effect of using team learning in an evidence-based medicine course for medical students.

    Daniel P. Hunt;Paul Haidet;John H. Coverdale;Boyd Richards

  • Building a History Rather Than Taking One: A Perspective on Information Sharing During the Medical Interview

    Paul Haidet;Debora A. Paterniti

  • Transforming a clinical clerkship with team learning

    Ruth E. Levine;Michael O'Boyle;Paul Haidet;David J. Lynn

  • Decoding the learning environment of medical education: a hidden curriculum perspective for faculty development.

    Janet P. Hafler;Allison R. Ownby;Britta M. Thompson;Carl E. Fasser

  • Analysis of the Team-Based Learning Literature: TBL Comes of Age.

    Paul Haidet;Karla Kubitz;Wayne T McCormack

  • An initial experience with "team learning" in medical education.

    Paul Haidet;Kimberly J O'Malley;Boyd Richards

  • Comparative Effectiveness of Goal Setting in Diabetes Mellitus Group Clinics:Randomized Clinical Trial

    Aanand D. Naik;Nynikka Palmer;Nynikka Palmer;Nancy J. Petersen;Nancy J. Petersen;Richard L. Street

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruth E. Levine
Ruth E. Levine The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Richard M. Frankel
Richard M. Frankel Washington University in St. Louis
David H. Berger
David H. Berger Harvard University
David E. Kern
David E. Kern Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Edward Krupat
Edward Krupat Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lisa A. Cooper
Lisa A. Cooper Johns Hopkins University
Scott M. Wright
Scott M. Wright Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Robert A. Bell
Robert A. Bell University of California, Davis
Nancy R. Kressin
Nancy R. Kressin Boston University
Stephen Scott
Stephen Scott Queen's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to diverse and impactful careers. For those interested in advanced clinical psychology, several psyd online programs offer flexibility and rigorous training for aspiring psychologists.

If you are considering a counseling career, there are increasingly popular affordable online mft programs tailored for students wanting to become Marriage and Family Therapists. These programs are designed to balance affordability, accreditation, and timely completion.

For those interested in a broader behavioral science path, an online masters psychology can provide a strong foundation for careers in education, research, and social services. Many programs cater to working adults needing flexible schedules.

Education professionals looking to advance into leadership may consider 2 year ed.d programs online. These fast-track programs are ideal for those eager to make an impact in academia or educational policy in a short timeframe.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Haidet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles