World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8720 8143 514 503 72 10006

Norman Segalowitz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Norman Segalowitz between 1968 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Norman Segalowitz published across 56 years, from 1968 to 2023, averaging 1.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2004. 1 of the 79 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2004. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1968 2023

79 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Norman Segalowitz: publications per year, 1968 to 2023
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 0
1982 2
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 0
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 6
2005 6
2006 3
2007 3
2008 2
2009 3
2010 4
2011 6
2012 1
2013 1
2014 2
2015 4
2016 4
2017 1
2018 1
2019 1
2020 2
2021 1
2022 0
2023 1
Total 79
Download as CSV

Norman Segalowitz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norman Segalowitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 72 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 72
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Norman Segalowitz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norman Segalowitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Norman Segalowitz is affiliated with Queensland University of Technology in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Arts and Humanities, with key subfields including General Health Professions, Language and Linguistics, Clinical Psychology, and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology.

Their work addresses several main topics, notably Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare, Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies, linguistics and terminology studies, Family Caregiving in Mental Illness, Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units, and Mental Health and Patient Involvement.

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Segalowitz are:

  • "Do Nurses Use Discourse Markers Differently when Using Their Second Language as Opposed to Their First while Interviewing Patients?" published in 2020 in the Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes
  • "The audience impact of an ethnodrama based on the lived experiences of family caregivers of loved ones with a mental illness," published in 2023 in Drama Therapy Review

Frequent collaborators associated with Segalowitz include Yeji Han, Laura Khalil, Eva Kehayia, Carolyn E. Turner, and Elizabeth Gatbonton.

Publications appear predominantly in venues such as the Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes and Drama Therapy Review, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of their research combining health professions, language studies, and mental health contexts.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency

    Norman Segalowitz

  • CONTEXT, CONTACT, AND COGNITION IN ORAL FLUENCY ACQUISITION: Learning Spanish in At Home and Study Abroad Contexts

    Norman Segalowitz;Barbara F. Freed

  • CONTEXT OF LEARNING AND SECOND LANGUAGE FLUENCY IN FRENCH: Comparing Regular Classroom, Study Abroad, and Intensive Domestic Immersion Programs

    Barbara F. Freed;Norman Segalowitz;Dan P. Dewey

  • Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition

    Norman S. Segalowitz;Sidney J. Segalowitz

  • The Language Contact Profile.

    Barbara F. Freed;Dan P. Dewey;Norman Segalowitz;Randall Halter

  • Automatic and controlled processes in the first- and second-language reading of fluent bilinguals.

    Micheline Favreau;Norman S. Segalowitz

  • Rethinking Communicative Language Teaching: A Focus on Access to Fluency

    Elizabeth Gatbonton;Norman Segalowitz

  • Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults

    Irena O'Brien;Norman Segalowitz;Barbara Freed;Joe Collentine

  • Creative Automatization: Principles for Promoting Fluency Within a Communicative Framework

    Elizabeth Gatbonton;Norman Segalowitz

  • Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance

    Norman Segalowitz

  • Automaticity and Second Languages

    Unknown

  • Overcoming language barriers in healthcare: A protocol for investigating safe and effective communication when patients or clinicians use a second language

    Renata F. I. Meuter;Cindy Gallois;Norman S. Segalowitz;Norman S. Segalowitz;Andrew G. Ryder;Andrew G. Ryder

  • Assessing the development of automaticity in second language word recognition.

    Sidney J. Segalowitz;Norman S. Segalowitz;Anthony G. Wood

  • Phonological memory and lexical, narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners

    Irena O'Brien;Norman Segalowitz;J. O.E. Collentine;Barbara Freed

  • A Comparison of Spanish Second Language Acquisition in Two Different Learning Contexts: Study Abroad and the Domestic Classroom.

    Norman Segalowitz;Barbara Freed;Joe Collentine;Barbara Lafford

  • Individual differences in second language acquisition.

    Norman Segalowitz

  • Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants

    Norman Segalowitz

  • Attention control and ability level in a complex cognitive skill: attention shifting and second-language proficiency.

    Norman Segalowitz;Sarah Frenkiel-Fishman

  • Second Language Reading in Fluent Bilinguals.

    Micheline Favreau;Norman S. Segalowitz

  • Semantic priming in a first and second language: evidence from reaction time variability and event-related brain potentials

    Natalie A. Phillips;Natalie A. Phillips;Norman Segalowitz;Irena O'Brien;Naomi Yamasaki

  • AUTOMATICITY AND LEXICAL SKILLS IN SECOND LANGUAGE FLUENCY: IMPLICATIONS FOR COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING

    Norman Segalowitz;Elizabeth Gatbonton

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew G. Ryder
Andrew G. Ryder Concordia University
Pavel Trofimovich
Pavel Trofimovich Concordia University
Sidney J. Segalowitz
Sidney J. Segalowitz Brock University
Natalie A. Phillips
Natalie A. Phillips Concordia University
Krista Byers-Heinlein
Krista Byers-Heinlein Concordia University
Diane Poulin-Dubois
Diane Poulin-Dubois Concordia University
Cindy Gallois
Cindy Gallois University of Queensland
Patsy M. Lightbown
Patsy M. Lightbown Concordia University
Talia Isaacs
Talia Isaacs University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a wide range of career opportunities beyond traditional roles. Graduates can pursue paths in counseling, industrial-organizational psychology, education, research, and health services. With the growth of accredited remote programs, students have access to flexible study options tailored for both recent high school graduates and working professionals.

When considering the right program, it’s valuable to compare regional offerings. For example, the best psychology degree programs ranking in Newark highlights schools with strong curricula and faculty support in New Jersey. Those interested in a Northeastern education can review the best psychology degree rankings in New Hampshire for programs that emphasize hands-on research and clinical experience.

On the West Coast, the best psychology degree rankings in Orange offer insights into top programs in California, while Southern students might benefit from the best psychology degree programs ranking in Orlando to find excellent options in Florida. Comparing these rankings can help students choose a pathway that aligns with their professional goals and preferred study environments.

Best Scientists Citing Norman Segalowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles