World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
20098
World Ranking
9993
National Ranking
5260

James H. Neely publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Neely sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 68 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James H. Neely D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Neely sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

James H. Neely is affiliated with the University at Albany, State University of New York, located in the United States. Their academic contributions are connected to this institution, reflecting their professional involvement in higher education and research within this university.

Although detailed information about their recent papers is not available, the record shows no documentation of specific published works including titles, years, or publication venues. Similarly, there is no data concerning frequent co-authors or collaboration networks within their research activities.

Information regarding frequent publication venues is absent, so it is unclear where this scientist typically disseminates their research findings. There are also no entries for book publications, leaving uncertainty about contributions to academic books or monographs.

The data does not specify main fields of study or subfields related to their research, nor does it list main topics of their scholarly work. This lack of information restricts identification of specific domains or themes in which they may specialize.

No awards or honors have been recorded for James H. Neely, and there is no indication of any dates or citations related to distinctions received. The scientist is noted as living, with no indication of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition : A selective review of current findings and theories

    Jh. Neely

  • Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.

    James H. Neely

  • The English Lexicon Project.

    David A Balota;Melvin J Yap;Michael J Cortese;Keith A Hutchison

  • Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes.

    James H. Neely

  • Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval.

    Michael C. Anderson;James H. Neely

  • Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching.

    James H. Neely;Dennis E. Keefe;Kent L. Ross

  • Semantic Context Effects on Visual Word Processing: A Hybrid Prospective-Retrospective Processing Theory

    James H. Neely;Dennis E. Keefe

  • Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory.

    Henry L. Roediger;James H. Neely

  • Test-Expectancy and Word-Frequency Effects in Recall and Recognition

    David A. Balota;James H. Neely

  • Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation.

    James H. Neely;Todd A. Kahan

  • The semantic priming project

    Keith A. Hutchison;David A. Balota;James H. Neely;Michael J. Cortese

  • Inhibition from semantically related primes: evidence of a category-specific inhibition.

    Teresa A. Blaxton;James H. Neely

  • When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition.

    Jennifer A. Stolz;James H. Neely

  • Semantic priming modulates the N400, N300, and N400RP

    Michael S. Franklin;Michael S. Franklin;Joseph Dien;Joseph Dien;James H. Neely;Elizabeth Huber

  • Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: the role of prospective prime-generated expectancies.

    Dennis E. Keefe;James H. Neely

  • The Effects of Blocked Versus Random Presentation and Semantic Relatedness of Stimulus Words on Response to a Modified Stroop Task Among Social Phobics

    Christian Holle;James H. Neely;Richard G. Heimberg

  • A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks

    Janet M. Duchek;James H. Neely

  • Dissociative episodic and semantic priming effects in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks

    James H Neely;Aydin Y Durgunoǧlu

  • A direct comparison of recognition failure rates for recallable names in episodic and semanticmemory tests

    James H. Neely;David G. Payne

  • With great expectations, can two "wrongs" prime a "right"?

    Keith A. Hutchison;James H. Neely;Jeffrey D. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Balota
David A. Balota Washington University in St. Louis
Henry L. Roediger
Henry L. Roediger Washington University in St. Louis
Melvin J. Yap
Melvin J. Yap National University of Singapore
Lisa Tabor Connor
Lisa Tabor Connor Washington University in St. Louis
Richard G. Heimberg
Richard G. Heimberg Temple University
Janet M. Duchek
Janet M. Duchek Washington University in St. Louis
Michael C. Anderson
Michael C. Anderson University of Cambridge
Maggie Shiffrar
Maggie Shiffrar Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Allan R. Wagner
Allan R. Wagner Yale University
Douglas L. Nelson
Douglas L. Nelson University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in pursuing a career in psychology, there are various online degree programs that can help you reach your goals. Many students choose to focus on mental health and substance abuse counseling, given the high demand in this field across the United States.

Requirements for becoming a counselor depend on your state and city. For example, if you want to know how to become a substance abuse counselor in Lexington, you’ll find specific steps and educational pathways that may differ from other regions. Similarly, understanding Lincoln substance abuse counselor certification requirements will be essential if you’re aiming to practice in Nebraska.

Different cities may also have their own procedures. If you’re interested in working in California, you can learn more about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Long Beach or discover the process for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Los Angeles.

Exploring these resources can help you choose the best online degree and prepare for a rewarding career in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing James H. Neely

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles