World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jaakko Astola

Jaakko Astola

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
66
Citations
20719
World Ranking
2293
National Ranking
15

Jaakko Astola publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaakko Astola sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 782 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jaakko Astola D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaakko Astola sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jaakko Astola is affiliated with Tampere University in Finland. Their research focuses primarily on computer science, mathematics, and engineering, contributing to multiple specialized fields within these domains.

The scientist's work spans various subfields of study, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Mathematical Physics

Astola's research topics cover a range of mathematical and engineering themes, such as:

  • Coding theory and cryptography
  • Graph theory and CDMA systems
  • Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
  • Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Cellular Automata and Applications
  • Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications

The scientist has coauthored many works with several researchers, including:

  • Radomir S. Stanković
  • Milena Stanković
  • Claudio Moraga
  • Vladimir Lukin
  • Богдан Коваленко

Astola's publications have appeared in various recognized venues, including:

  • IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
  • Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae Sectio computatorica

Notable recent papers include:

  • Construction of Ternary Bent Functions by FFT-Like Permutation Algorithms, 2021, IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
  • Haar spectra of Generalized Boolean bent functions, 2025, Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae Sectio computatorica

In addition to journal articles, Astola has contributed to academic books. Among these is Bent Functions and Permutation Methods, published in 2024 by Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

Best Publications

  • Vector median filters

    J. Astola;P. Haavisto;Y. Neuvo

  • Image database TID2013

    Nikolay Ponomarenko;Lina Jin;Oleg Ieremeiev;Vladimir Lukin

  • Fundamentals of nonlinear digital filtering

    Jaakko Astola;Pauli Kuosmanen

  • Analysis of the meter of acoustic musical signals

    A.P. Klapuri;A.J. Eronen;J.T. Astola

  • ON BETWEEN-COEFFICIENT CONTRAST MASKING OF DCT BASIS FUNCTIONS

    N Ponomarenko;F Silvestri;K Egiazarian;Marco Carli

  • Color image database TID2013: Peculiarities and preliminary results

    Nikolay Ponomarenko;Oleg Ieremeiev;Vladimir Lukin;Karen Egiazarian

  • From Local Kernel to Nonlocal Multiple-Model Image Denoising

    Vladimir Katkovnik;Alessandro Foi;Karen Egiazarian;Jaakko Astola

  • Analysis of the properties of median and weighted median filters using threshold logic and stack filter representation

    O. Yli-Harja;J. Astola;Y. Neuvo

  • Optimal weighted median filtering under structural constraints

    Ruikang Yang;Lin Yin;M. Gabbouj;J. Astola

  • A NEW FULL-REFERENCE QUALITY METRICS BASED ON HVS

    K Egiazarian;J Astola;N Ponomarenko;Lukin

  • Systematic bioinformatic analysis of expression levels of 17,330 human genes across 9,783 samples from 175 types of healthy and pathological tissues.

    Sami Kilpinen;Sami Kilpinen;Reija Autio;Kalle Ojala;Kalle Ojala;Kristiina Iljin

  • Optimal weighted median filters under structural constraints

    R. Yang;L. Yin;M. Gabbouj;J. Astola

  • Classification of small UAVs and birds by micro-Doppler signatures

    Pavlo Molchanov;Ronny I.A. Harmanny;Jaco J.M. de Wit;Karen Egiazarian

  • Color image database for evaluation of image quality metrics

    N. Ponomarenko;V. Lukin;K. Egiazarian;J. Astola

  • Generalized Hampel Filters

    Ronald K. Pearson;Yrjö Neuvo;Jaakko Astola;Moncef Gabbouj

  • Local Approximation Techniques in Signal and Image Processing

    Vladimir Katkovnik;Karen Egiazarian;Jaakko Astola

  • Classification of small UAVs and birds by micro-Doppler signatures

    P. Molchanov;K. Egiazarian;J. Astola;R. I. A. Harmanny

  • An Introduction to Nonlinear Image Processing

    Edward R. Dougherty;Jaakko T. Astola

  • Compressive sensing computational ghost imaging.

    Vladimir Katkovnik;Jaakko Astola

  • Adaptive Window Size Image De-noising Based on Intersection of Confidence Intervals (ICI) Rule

    Vladimir Katkovnik;Karen Egiazarian;Jaakko Astola

  • The role of certain Post classes in Boolean network models of genetic networks

    Ilya Shmulevich;Harri Lähdesmäki;Harri Lähdesmäki;Edward R. Dougherty;Jaakko Astola

  • Binary polynomial transforms and nonlinear digital filters

    S. S Agaian;Jaakko Astola;K. Egiazarian

Frequent Co-Authors

Karen O. Egiazarian
Karen O. Egiazarian Tampere University
Vladimir V. Lukin
Vladimir V. Lukin National Aerospace University – Kharkiv Aviation Institute
Vladimir Katkovnik
Vladimir Katkovnik Tampere University
Yrjö Neuvo
Yrjö Neuvo Aalto University
Edward R. Dougherty
Edward R. Dougherty Texas A&M University
Moncef Gabbouj
Moncef Gabbouj Tampere University
Sos S. Agaian
Sos S. Agaian City University of New York
Sampsa Hautaniemi
Sampsa Hautaniemi University of Helsinki
Mark G. Karpovsky
Mark G. Karpovsky Boston University
Pavlo Molchanov
Pavlo Molchanov Nvidia (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a broad range of related online degrees and specialized career pathways. Students looking to accelerate their learning may want to consider a fast track computer science degree, enabling them to enter the workforce more quickly with a robust technical background.

For those interested in engineering fields, an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering program offers an interdisciplinary approach. This pathway blends environmental studies with engineering fundamentals, preparing students for impactful roles in sustainability and infrastructure.

Mechanical engineering is another popular avenue blending well with computer science skills. Learners often ask about a mechanical engineering degree online cost to find affordable and flexible programs, which lead to careers in design, automation, and advanced manufacturing.

Additionally, a bachelor of science in physics online empowers students with analytical and problem-solving skills applicable across science and tech industries.

By considering these online options, you can choose a career path that aligns with your interests while taking advantage of flexible, accredited programs offered across the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Jaakko Astola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles