World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
18384
World Ranking
4895
National Ranking
2695

Boaz Keysar publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boaz Keysar sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Boaz Keysar D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boaz Keysar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Boaz Keysar is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States and conducts research primarily in psychology and social sciences. Their work spans several subfields including social psychology, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, general decision sciences, and developmental and educational psychology.

The main topics investigated by Keysar encompass cultural differences and values, social and intergroup psychology, decision-making and behavioral economics, language, metaphor, and cognition, as well as language, discourse, and communication strategies. Additional topics include challenges faced by international students and expatriates and memory processes and influences.

Keysar has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Journal of Conflict Resolution
  • Risk Analysis
  • Vaccines
  • PLoS ONE

Notable recent papers include:

  • The extreme illusion of understanding, 2022, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Lingua Franca as a Hidden Barrier to Conflict Resolution, 2022, Journal of Conflict Resolution
  • Foreign language reduces false memories by increasing memory monitoring, 2023, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Language modality influences risk perception: Innovations read well but sound even better, 2022, Risk Analysis
  • Young children enlarge the pie: Antecedents of negotiation skills, 2022, Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Frequent collaborators include Leigh H. Grant, Janet Geipel, Ifat Maoz, Becky Ka Ying Lau, and Yanting Wu.

Boaz Keysar's contributions to the field have also been recognized through awards such as the Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1997.

Best Publications

  • Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment

    Nicholas Epley;Boaz Keysar;Leaf Van Boven;Thomas Gilovich

  • Understanding Metaphorical Comparisons: Beyond Similarity.

    Sam Glucksberg;Boaz Keysar

  • Limits on theory of mind use in adults

    Boaz Keysar;Shuhong Lin;Dale J Barr

  • Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension

    Boaz Keysar;Dale J. Barr;Jennifer A. Balin;Jason S. Brauner

  • Why don't we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility

    Shiri Lev-Ari;Boaz Keysar

  • The Foreign-Language Effect Thinking in a Foreign Tongue Reduces Decision Biases

    Boaz Keysar;Sayuri Lynn Hayakawa;Sun Gyu An

  • When do speakers take into account common ground

    William S. Horton;Boaz Keysar

  • Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction

    Nicholas Epley;Carey K Morewedge;Boaz Keysar

  • The Effect of Culture on Perspective Taking

    Shali Wu;Boaz Keysar

  • Your morals depend on language.

    Albert Costa;Alice Foucart;Sayuri Lynn Hayakawa;Melina Aparici

  • Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention

    Shuhong Lin;Boaz Keysar;Nicholas Epley

  • Offering a Hand to Pragmatic Understanding: The Role of Speech and Gesture in Comprehension and Memory

    Spencer D. Kelly;Dale J. Barr;R.Breckinridge Church;Katheryn Lynch

  • The illusory transparency of intention: linguistic perspective taking in text.

    Boaz Keysar

  • Communication and miscommunication: The role of egocentric processes

    Boaz Keysar

  • Conventional Language: How Metaphorical Is It?

    Boaz Keysar;Yeshayahu Shen;Sam Glucksberg;William S Horton

  • Speakers' Overestimation of Their Effectiveness

    Boaz Keysar;Anne S. Henly

  • Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: Can one keep a secret by spilling the beans?

    Boaz Keysar;Bridget Bly

  • On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse.

    Boaz Keysar

  • Metaphor and Thought: How metaphors work

    Sam Glucksberg;Boaz Keysar

  • Anchoring Comprehension in Linguistic Precedents

    Dale J. Barr;Boaz Keysar

  • Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment

    Nicholas Epley;Boaz Keysar;Thomas Gilovich;Leaf Van Boven

Frequent Co-Authors

Albert Costa
Albert Costa Pompeu Fabra University
Nicholas Epley
Nicholas Epley University of Chicago
Sam Glucksberg
Sam Glucksberg Princeton University
Katherine D. Kinzler
Katherine D. Kinzler University of Chicago
Thomas Gilovich
Thomas Gilovich Cornell University
Shaul Shalvi
Shaul Shalvi University of Amsterdam
Leaf Van Boven
Leaf Van Boven University of Colorado Boulder
Mante S. Nieuwland
Mante S. Nieuwland Max Planck Society
Daniel T. Gilbert
Daniel T. Gilbert Harvard University
Amanda L. Woodward
Amanda L. Woodward University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology program in the United States involves balancing your budget, career goals, and preferred learning format. Many students are now considering online degrees, which offer flexibility and accessibility, especially for those with work or family commitments.

Affordability is a major factor. Prospective students searching for the cheapest psychology degrees in University Park can find universities that combine reputable coursework with lower tuition costs. Similarly, affordable programs are also widely available in other regions, such as the cheapest psychology programs in Utah and the cheapest psychology degrees in Vermont. These options allow students to earn respected credentials without excessive debt.

When exploring study options, popularity and program variety are also important considerations. For example, the most popular psychology degree programs in Charlotte highlight programs that attract a diverse student body and often provide networking and internship opportunities.

Overall, prospective psychology students should compare affordability, flexibility, and program popularity to choose the pathway that best aligns with their professional ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Boaz Keysar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles