World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
57
Citations
14640
World Ranking
3394
National Ranking
39

Peter Kjeldsen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Kjeldsen sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 221 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter Kjeldsen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Kjeldsen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Kjeldsen is affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and engineering, with a particular emphasis on landfill environmental impact studies and related fields.

The main fields of study associated with Peter Kjeldsen include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Engineering

Within these broader areas, their work spans several subfields:

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Process Chemistry and Technology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Their research covers a range of topics, chiefly:

  • Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Underground infrastructure and sustainability
  • Odor and Emission Control Technologies
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Environmental remediation with nanomaterials

Peter Kjeldsen has published extensively in academic journals, with a notable concentration in certain venues:

  • Waste Management
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Scientific Reports

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Trace gas emissions from municipal solid waste landfills: A review" (2020, Waste Management)
  • "Methane emission dynamics from a Danish landfill: The effect of changes in barometric pressure" (2021, Waste Management)
  • "Trace gas composition in landfill gas at Danish landfills receiving low-organic waste" (2021, Waste Management)
  • "Mitigation of methane emissions from three Danish landfills using different biocover systems" (2022, Waste Management)
  • "Efficiency of gas collection systems at Danish landfills and implications for regulations" (2022, Waste Management)

The scientist collaborates with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Charlotte Scheutz
  • Zhenhan Duan
  • Konstantinos Kissas
  • Julie Maria Falk
  • C. Buck

Best Publications

  • PRESENT AND LONG-TERM COMPOSITION OF MSW LANDFILL LEACHATE: A REVIEW

    Peter Kjeldsen;Morton A. Barlaz;Alix P. Rooker;Anders Baun

  • Biogeochemistry of landfill leachate plumes

    Thomas Højlund Christensen;Peter Kjeldsen;Poul Løgstrup Bjerg;Dorthe Lærke Jensen

  • Attenuation of landfill leachate pollutants in aquifers

    Thomas Højlund Christensen;Peter Kjeldsen;Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen;Gorm Heron

  • Microbial methane oxidation processes and technologies for mitigation of landfill gas emissions.

    Charlotte Scheutz;Peter Kjeldsen;Jean E. Bogner;Alex De Visscher

  • Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).

    Jean Bogner;Riitta Pipatti;Seiji Hashimoto;Cristobal Diaz

  • 2.1 – Basic Biochemical Processes in Landfills

    Thomas H. Christensen;Peter Kjeldsen

  • Environmental factors influencing attenuation of methane and hydrochlorofluorocarbons in landfill cover soils.

    Charlotte Scheutz;Peter Kjeldsen

  • Attenuation of methane and volatile organic compounds in landfill soil covers

    Charlotte Scheutz;Hans Mosbæk;Peter Kjeldsen

  • Lateral gas transport in soil adjacent to an old landfill : factors governing emissions and methane oxidation

    Mette Christophersen;Peter Kjeldsen;Helle Holst;Jeffrey Chanton

  • Methodologies for measuring fugitive methane emissions from landfills - A review.

    Jacob Mønster;Peter Kjeldsen;Charlotte Scheutz

  • Behaviour of cyanides in soil and groundwater: A review

    Peter Kjeldsen

  • Composition of leachate from old landfills in Denmark.

    Peter Kjeldsen;Mette Christophersen

  • Critical evaluation of factors required to terminate the postclosure monitoring period at solid waste landfills.

    Morton A. Barlaz;Alix P. Rooker;Peter Kjeldsen;Mohammed A. Gabr

  • Quantifying methane emission from fugitive sources by combining tracer release and downwind measurements - a sensitivity analysis based on multiple field surveys.

    Jacob G. Mønster;Jerker Samuelsson;Peter Kjeldsen;Chris W. Rella

  • Quantification of methane emissions from 15 Danish landfills using the mobile tracer dispersion method

    Jacob G. Mønster;Jerker Samuelsson;Peter Kjeldsen;Charlotte Scheutz

  • Comparative Oxidation and Net Emissions of Methane and Selected Non-Methane Organic Compounds in Landfill Cover Soils

    Charlotte Schuetz;Jean Bogner;Jeffrey Chanton;Donald Blake

  • Quantification of multiple methane emission sources at landfills using a double tracer technique.

    Charlotte Scheutz;J. Samuelsson;Anders Michael Fredenslund;Peter Kjeldsen

  • Atmospheric emissions and attenuation of non-methane organic compounds in cover soils at a French landfill

    Charlotte Scheutz;Jean Bogner;Jeffrey P. Chanton;D. Blake

  • Trace gas emissions from municipal solid waste landfills: A review

    Zhenhan Duan;Charlotte Scheutz;Peter Kjeldsen

  • Characterization of an old municipal landfill (Grindsted, Denmark) as a groundwater pollution source: landfill hydrology and leachate migration

    Peter Kjeldsen;Aase Grundtvig;Pia Winther;Jens Strodl Andersen

  • Groundwater pollution source characterization of an old landfill

    Peter Kjeldsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Charlotte Scheutz
Charlotte Scheutz Technical University of Denmark
Thomas Højlund Christensen
Thomas Højlund Christensen Technical University of Denmark
Poul Løgstrup Bjerg
Poul Løgstrup Bjerg Technical University of Denmark
Philip John Binning
Philip John Binning Technical University of Denmark
Thomas Ostenfeld Larsen
Thomas Ostenfeld Larsen Technical University of Denmark
Anders Baun
Anders Baun Technical University of Denmark
Patrick Höhener
Patrick Höhener Aix-Marseille University
Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen
Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen Technical University of Denmark
Jeffrey P. Chanton
Jeffrey P. Chanton Florida State University
Donald R. Blake
Donald R. Blake University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various online degrees and career pathways. For students interested in multidisciplinary approaches, an cheapest online dsw programs offer opportunities to blend social work with environmental advocacy and policy development. This combination can be powerful in addressing community health and sustainability issues.

If you prefer a broader educational foundation, an affordable online general studies degree provides flexibility to tailor courses around environmental topics, making it a versatile choice for career changers or those seeking a customizable curriculum.

For those seeking less intensive study loads while still earning a valuable credential, exploring the easy bachelor degrees may be appealing. Such programs can help students quickly gain relevant knowledge to enter environmental roles without overwhelming course demands.

Lastly, specialized programs like the best online geology degree are ideal for students focused on earth sciences and fieldwork. These degrees provide deep expertise applicable in environmental consulting, research, and conservation efforts.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Kjeldsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles